Overall Satisfaction with Hyper-V
Hyper-V is used in our environment for test and development environments as well as VDI infrastructure and WDS image maintenance. Hyper-V is used as a lower-cost alternative to VMWare that can be installed and used on our existing Windows infrastructure. The infrastructure is used primarily by our development team.
- Lower cost
- Virtualization of Windows servers
- VDI infrastructure of Windows desktop
- Flexible
- Networking
- Managability
- Add-on tools
- lower TCO
- High availability
- relative ease of use.
- Flexible, able to handle multiple workloads.
- It has compatibility with Windows.
- Cost of licensing the product in comparison to other alternatives.
- Setup is sometimes confusing and VMware knowledge does not always translate well.
Hyper-V performs very well in environment running windows operating systems and performs well under various workloads. The replication and recovery features of hyper-v work well but lack some of usability of tools such as Zerto, VMware replication and site Recovery Manager to perform tasks such as disaster recover testing. The user interface of hyper-v combined with Microsoft failover clustering can be very confusing and difficult to validate. this can cause unintended outages due to misconfigure items such as cluster-aware storage.
Do you think Hyper-V delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Hyper-V's feature set?
Yes
Did Hyper-V live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Hyper-V go as expected?
No
Would you buy Hyper-V again?
Yes
Hyper-V Feature Ratings
Using Hyper-V
10 - My current environment is used for testing of windows patching and other Windows specific items. Hyper-v is also used for creation and maintenance of WDS images for desktop deployment. My past employer used Hyper-v for production and near production environments with offsite replication and a 2 node cluster.
2 - People who manage Hyper-v will need a wide array of knowledge in multipl IT areas such as storage, networking, virtualization, operating systems, Windows clustering, security principles and other Widows specific technology. so, the best person would be someone with a broad array of knowledge in multiple disciplines with a firm understanding of virtualization.
- pre-production testing
- need for "cheap" virtualization
- easy deployment
- management of WDS images
- offsite replication without 3rd party tools
- reduced TCO
- replacement of vmware in production to save cost
Evaluating Hyper-V and Competitors
No - We evaluate several alternatives to hyper-v including MS virtual desktop, open source virtualization tools and VMWare
- Price
- Product Usability
- Prior Experience with the Product
Hyper-v was used in a test environment by my second employer and was selected primarily due to the cost of VMWare. We were able to use virtualization to spin up test environments or near production environments without the need to purchase very expensive VMWare liceses as used in production while maintaining most of the features and usability.
The main issue that I had was with learning how to enable features and to configure the environment with high availability enabled. I found that, where VMware is very intuitive via VCenter and clustering, the Hyper-v interface did not always perform in the way that it should. this ultimately resulted in an outage in that environment.
Hyper-V Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal - Due to the learning curve of Hyper-v in a high availabilty environment, I discovered the importance of change management when performing tasks such as server migrations and failovers as opposed to how it is done in a VMWare environment. This was learned the hard way due to an outage caused by a failed server migration within the same cluster.
- configuring clusters
- outage due to misconfiguration
- convincing management
Hyper-V Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Knowledgeable team | Slow Resolution Problems left unsolved Not kept informed Escalation required Difficult to get immediate help Need to explain problems multiple times Support doesn't seem to care Slow Initial Response |
Our Support was through Microsoft Volume licensing and was running on Microsoft Windows Server Datacenter. This gave us premium support for the Windows feature set including Hyper-v.
Using Hyper-V
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | Not well integrated Lots to learn |
- Management interface
- VM Storage management
- Networking
- High Availability
- Disk resizing
- networking with multiple VLANs