The platform has many ways to customize it.
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Video Streaming
It is safe to say that the capability of this platform in content delivery and full management backend has been accepted. Even though there was the first involvement of many in its implementation, it has ensured efficient work flow of the business since the training drain period was inversely compensated by some gains obtained.
Pros
- Live caption and translation services of AI.
- A workplace content delivery network with global reach.
- These are functions such as single authorization and full encryption.
Cons
- Limited external integration options.
- When it comes to the mobile app experience, it is still being improved.
- Some aspects of interface customization
- Increased global audience.
- It cut the OSD of virtual event production costs.
- Improved viewer engagement metrics.
The ability to scale the platform, as well as its ability to interface with other IBM systems, was the reason they decided to use it. Integral to the concept of an advanced analytics suite was the comparative advantage it had over other competitors and analysis tools crucial for considering the viewership parameters in detail.
Do you think IBM Video Streaming delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with IBM Video Streaming's feature set?
Yes
Did IBM Video Streaming live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of IBM Video Streaming go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy IBM Video Streaming again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation