Overall Satisfaction with Magnolia
Magnolia is used by the whole organization to manage content for various websites, however my department is a key team for support. It is used for unstructured content, structured content, and digital assets. Custom solutions and content apps are developed in house. The main websites for VSP are all housed within Magnolia, which adds up to many pages.
- Magnolia is very stable.
- Magnolia is easy to learn.
- Structured content apps save time.
- The digital asset manager needs to do much more; it is just basic.
- The new version of Magnolia has an interface which is harder to use than the previous version.
- Too many solutions must be customized instead of coming out of the box.
- Huge variety of sites are maintained
- New content is published quickly
- Business employees can learn the system successfully
- Sites are stable and stay up
As stated previously, a variety of business roles can learn Magnolia and successfully publish content.
I have found Magnolia to be fast and responsive, based on the integrations and APIs we use.
I like the content apps, if they are set up well with a good plan. Content can be published quickly and troubleshooted when needed. The category app is easy to use.
Do you think Magnolia delivers good value for the price?
Are you happy with Magnolia's feature set?
Did Magnolia live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Magnolia go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Magnolia again?
It is well suited to simple sites that have a similar look and feel, and with a small number of templates. As the sites grow more complex, custom code is needed, which may fail when the system is upgraded. Connections to third-party solutions may be difficult to use, but if set up well can really expand the solution.