Overall Satisfaction with Magnolia
I am currently working on a project where we make use of magnolia for the creation of an airline website in which magnolia manages all the content of this. This content is consumed in two ways. On the one hand via headless from other front platforms, and on the other from the pages generated within the content manager.
- Multisite management
- Page translation module
- API Rest
- Message and workflow management
- Improve performance on heavily loaded contentApps
- Generation of contentApps with different nodetypes
- Planning through content release scheduling
- If the data to be displayed on the page is retrieved from a content app with a lot of data load, the page load is affected
- The multisite management of the web is much simpler by making use of the live copy module, it reduces the management of the content in the different sites.
what I like the most about magnolia is the customization capacity it has in every way. For example, at the template level, there are many different components that I have implemented with a multitude of customizable fields, for example rendering the component on different platforms. The possibility of creating custom traits that, for example, detect if the user is logged in or not if they have certain permission ... On the other hand, one of the things I like the most about magnolia is the live copy module, which allows you to manage different sites in a very easy way.
Do you think Magnolia delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Magnolia's feature set?
Yes
Did Magnolia live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Magnolia go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Magnolia again?
Yes