That which does not kill me, makes me stronger
Overall Satisfaction with PowerDMS
PowerDMS is being utilized to manage 3 accreditation processes, both in a national and state accreditation. It is being utilized throughout the department. It address problems that include accreditation management, training management and document control. Has greatly served in the reduction of paper usage, particularly with the accreditation process. Significant savings in personnel costs with its web based process.
Pros
- Full integration of policy/procedures, training and document management.
- Employees are able to utilize PowerDMS for policy distribution and review.
- Automatic electronic documentation of employee training.
Cons
- Interface seems a bit static.
- Unable to adjust training due date once it has been acquired by an employee.
- Ability to copy documents to various accreditation processes as opposed to being limited to previous cycles within the same accreditation process.
- Comprehensive managing of multiple accreditation processes.
- Integrated training management.
- For a law enforcement agencies it is particularly beneficial being able to distribute policy updates and training material to officers in the field through mobile computers. Personnel remain on the street to received the information as apposed to being on station.
Have not used other platforms. Selected based upon other user recommendations.
Using PowerDMS
60 - Law enforcement, Law enforcement administration
3 - User and administrator access
- Accreditation
- Training
- Document Management
- Distribute and maintain non accreditation documents
- Provide training to personnel in the field via mobile computer technology
- Increased test taking for training.
Evaluating PowerDMS and Competitors
- Product Features
- Product Usability
Features and Usability have been critical by reducing time and effort and therefor expense in managing multiple accreditation processes. It has has created a common mechanism with which to manage those various processes.
Would not have changed it.
PowerDMS Implementation
- Vendor implemented
Change management was minimal - Impact was so minimal that there are no specific lessons to reflect upon.
- Employee complaints about another platform to sign in to
PowerDMS Training
- Self-taught
The learning curve didn't seem to be problematic.
Configuring PowerDMS
Training module could have an easier interface. Options are not well presented when designing test and other training methods
Some - we have done small customizations to the interface - Simple, but seems limited, if my understanding of the user interface is accurate.
Improve on the training module. Training tracking is great, but designing courses is confusing.
PowerDMS Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
When setting up users, passwords and written directives when the product was first purchased
Using PowerDMS
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Feel confident using | None |
- Uploading and attaching documents
- Search function is effective
- I find creating multiple training items such as test, video, etc cumbersome when attempting to include those items into one training topic
Yes - I don't use the mobile interface
PowerDMS Reliability
Integrating PowerDMS
- PDF file uploads
PDF file uploads
- Not familiar with options available. Movie integration seems cumbersome
Not familiar with options available. Movie integration seems cumbersome
- File import/export
I don't have enough integration experience to offer qualified advice
Relationship with PowerDMS
I don't have specifics for this question
I have been very satisfied in dealing with the vendor
Upgrading PowerDMS
Yes - No problems or unexpected impacts.
- Improved functionality,
- Continued benefit of listening to end user recommendations and implementing changes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation