Happy to use it
Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete
We use TestComplete to write automated tests and support our quality assurance process. We test the applications/system (web, desktop) that we use on a daily basis in order to generate test data, validate data compliance, non-regression, and integration between several systems. It can be easily integrated with other systems. We integrated it into Quality Center (QC) to monitor the tests that are performed by TestComplete/TestExecute because QC is our quality management software.
Pros
- Recognition of element on web page or in view app.
- Integration with other systems.
Cons
- Possibility to test applications through Citrix Receiver.
- Every time we automate a process, it saves us a lot of time in the tests.
- This allows analysts to focus on the complex cases of our tests.
- It allows us to quickly detect errors and have an overview thanks to the screenshots integrated into the tests.
TestComplete is more complete than Cypress.io because Cypress.io is only used to complete end-to-end testing for web apps. These two tools are user friendly and easy to use. For the needs of our company, we have chosen TestComplete for the variety of testing applications.
Do you think TestComplete delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with TestComplete's feature set?
Yes
Did TestComplete live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of TestComplete go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy TestComplete again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation