AccuRanker vs. Bing Webmaster Tools

Well suited:

• for an agency or SEO company
• for marketing dep. of ecommerce
• if you are a freelancer that doing inhouse SEO for yourself or your customers.

Not for you:

• if youre new to SEO (too many jargon, new words and shortcuts)
• if you just need to monitor your SEO company (use Google Search Console instead, it is simpler)

Incentivized

I always make sure that we are actively using Bing and Google. There is a tradeoff in your time when you use more tools, but there's also benefit in multiple perspectives. And don't forget that Bing is a very viable search engine that receives 500 million search queries each month. You may find that your business benefits from a relatively small amount of attention paid to Bing because search ranking there is easier (not easy, easier).

Incentivized

• competition tracking
• keyword tracking with tagging and historical rankings positions
• SoV (share of voice) metrics that helps to understand traffic opportunities
• Grump ;) (their Tiger that shows you current Google algo behavior)
• keyword discovery - they can show you where you have some opportunities to get more traffic with your current content
• more data and reports when you integrate GSC and GA

Incentivized

• Clarity. Bing Webmaster Tools is well-designed and easy to navigate, even for beginners.
• Keyword rankings. Gives more visibility than Google Search Console into how your website ranks for specific keywords.
• In-program SEO editing. Allows you to submit URLs, disavow links, block URLs, control BingBot's crawl, and more.

Incentivized

• action dashboard - with commands what to do today, what should I focus on first place, to create targets and a way how to reach them
• email reports - should be embeded into message, not added as pdf attachement. Just like Google Search Console is doing it.
• add Google Places as a separate report/tool

Incentivized

• The user-interface isn't as friendly or appealing as Google's - very bland overall.
• The way they present their Page Traffic report is a big turn-off. It's basically just a grid of numbers and arrows which is hard to interpret at a high level.

Incentivized

Very usable overall, quick to find information and conduct analysis for example of how a price of content is performing on Bing search. User interface is a bit clunky at times but easy enough once you get used to it.

Incentivized

• allows to group keywords (by tags) and reports tags as a bunch of kws
• competition reporting (with keywords positions and rank tracking in time)
• SoV - share of voice - metric, that allows you to see true potential of your keywords
• search intent - identifies informational/navigational/commercial/transactional keywords (even in Polish!)
• integration with Google Analytics and Google Search Console gives more and more data that you may analyze

Incentivized

I think that Bing does a good job of being a competitive product in a space that has very basic and insanely complex products. While Bing isn't pretty, it gets the job done and also gets you the right tools in a simple and straight forward backend UI. The ability to place Bing ads, track SEO and see how your site is performing, all from one backend interface is awesome!

Incentivized

• + it was easier to see what competition is doing - you may see their "backstage"
• + easy way to monitor group of keywords (tagging) so no need to focus on particular keyword
• - takes some time to analyze whole domain
• - no whitelabel reports (it would save a lot of time)

Incentivized

• Not really an ROI product but the ability to do more tasks than google is something that can be used as added value for clients
• Having another search engine to do reporting on helps increase hours and client spend
• some issues flagged in bing but not seen in google can be fixed once shown in BWT

Incentivized