Overall Satisfaction with Bing Webmaster Tools
We always use Bing Webmaster Tools in conjunction with Google Search Console, Semrush, and other appropriate solutions. Each has its own vagaries and will flag different issues and offer slightly different solutions. Google is obviously the player that all search marketers have to satisfy. But it's taken years for Google to catch up to the thoroughly excellent Bing Webmaster Tools. Bing's version of these search engine view's understanding of a website has always been slightly better than Google's.
There are a couple of standout Bing options, including new integration with Microsoft's Clarity that allows you to see screen recordings of visits.
After closely looking at both, I think they're now well-matched. That means that Google should always be your first choice. You're optimizing for Google, not Bing, after all. But if your work processes support a second or third option, Bing would be a nice choice for second.
There are a couple of standout Bing options, including new integration with Microsoft's Clarity that allows you to see screen recordings of visits.
After closely looking at both, I think they're now well-matched. That means that Google should always be your first choice. You're optimizing for Google, not Bing, after all. But if your work processes support a second or third option, Bing would be a nice choice for second.
- Manual scans are returned fast--often within an hour.
- You can import all of your Google Search Console properties with a few clicks.
- Bing's interface is flatter than Google's and easy to use.
- Benchmarking similar sites is a nice touch.
- Context-based help visible on the page would be awesome.
- Keyword research is a fantastic tool that needs more context.
- The submission API that lets you "automate URL submission" and submit new content quickly is poorly explained and creates doubt among people who might wonder why they need to submit content.
- The biggest positive is the certainty that comes from using a search engine's data. There are based on actual data, not samples and projections that are then scaled up.
- The SEO Reports are exceptionally easy to use.
- The visual site explorer is something that Google Search Console does not have (although Google Analytics does)
- The user interface is excellent.
Bing, which is free to use, is a good adjunct to our use of all these tools. If I had to stop using all but two, Bing and Google would be the ones that I would keep. Others have their place in our cycle based on what Google and Bing are reporting, but these are our early warning systems. Even if they don't offer the best way to a solution, they are the final word in what appears via their search index.
Do you think Bing Webmaster Tools delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Bing Webmaster Tools's feature set?
Yes
Did Bing Webmaster Tools live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Bing Webmaster Tools go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Bing Webmaster Tools again?
Yes