Adobe Journey Optimizer vs. Infor Omni-Channel Campaign Management

AJO is best suited for advanced Martech teams who are already bought into the Adobe ecosystem through the use of RTCDP, AA, AAM, etc. Organizations that are starting their Martech journey are good candidates, as well as those who are reevaluating all of their marketing channel vendors near the same time. Success in AJO is highly dependent on the number of marketing channels added. Close coordination with database teams is essential for success. Many of the offline data requirements benefit from modeling of the data. Having dedicated resources developing AJO (RTCDP)-specific views will reduce the amount of QA required to bring the solutions to market

Incentivized

This tool is great in the retail industry with a huge customer and guest presence where a huge influx of data is always being analyzed and being reported via different sources. This tool makes it easy to organize that and it helps with side by side comparison of the information. Great for business with multiple locations where all of the information is being fed to some central system. I don't believe it is one for small businesses or individual owners.

Incentivized

• pre built use case playbooks provide a basis for various trips
• provides customized messaging
• custom actions let different systems and databases be easily integrated

Incentivized

• Forecasting revenue trends for better business management.
• Collecting information in specific formats from the field for better investment decisions.
• Integration with alert tools such as Jira or email client.

Incentivized

• It doesn´t keep the last search you sis in the journeys and you have to enter the search parameter every time
• there is a window of time during the day that the audiences give out errors and you can´t see the estimates
• I should be able to select STO in campaigns, not only in journeys
• I should be able to select the email parameters when using campaigns

Incentivized

• It can do a better job if integration is in place with outside organization vendors or 3rd party tools, which is sometimes challenging.
• Help, about, and tutorial sections of the tool can be improved with more specific examples and how to do videos.
• Support can be better with more resources.

Incentivized

At times, Adobe Journey Optimizer offers too many options, making things less user-friendly than I would personally prefer. As mentioned earlier, there is a tendency to encounter decision paralysis with the increase in available options. While having options is excellent, in typical Adobe fashion, too many can be overwhelming for users

Incentivized

They both have their pros and cons, I feel it depends on the users that the products are targetting, SFMC is has more specialized customizations, Adobe does offer similar but require a higher technical knowledge which is not something that is provided bt the other product

Incentivized

Infor Omni-Channel Campaign Management stands out because of its capabilities for effective and great reporting, always a challenge for a fast-paced working environment where we need to analyze data in a very timely manner coming from different sources. We used another tool previously and it was not working as expected so we decided to move to this Infor tool and we are glad we made that decision of switching.

Incentivized

• Multichannel onboarding journey improving the engagement of freshmen in the business, resulting in a decrease in the dropout rate.
• Separate business of anticipation of receivables from suppliers that used to be manual and now I have connected this entire operation via the S3 connector, less manual work and significant gains in conversions and payments

Incentivized

• Great ROI with time efficiency and less resources.
• Reporting accuracy and detailed level comparison makes it very positive impact.
• Individual personalization makes it easier for the users to do the tasks in turn results in positive ROI.

Incentivized