IntelliGrants, from Agate Software vs. FIMS vs. WizeHive Zengine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IntelliGrants
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Since 1997, the IntelliGrants Grants Management Software system has been implemented for use by over 120 clients in 32 states. With the IGX platform of IntelliGrants, Agate Software aims to push this market into the future with a more responsive, easier to navigate grants management system.N/A
FIMS
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Formerly from Blackbaud and based on the former MicroEdge FIMS product, FIMS is a software solution used to manage requests, approvals, and declinations for grantmaking and scholarships.N/A
WizeHive Zengine
Score 9.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wizehive offers Zengine, a cloud-based submission management platform for grants, awards, scholarships and other kinds of awards ands applications. Zengine can be used to track customers, job candidates, projects or more and replaces paper processes, outgrown spreadsheets, or generic software products.N/A
Pricing
IntelliGrants, from Agate SoftwareFIMSWizeHive Zengine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IntelliGrantsFIMSWizeHive Zengine
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsZengine by WizeHive is a flexible platform that can be set up to directly address the needs and requirements of your organization. As such, pricing is determined after a thorough discussion about your process and goals. Pricing does typically fall into three areas, each determined by the complexity of program, features required, and the number of programs being managed in the platform.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IntelliGrants, from Agate SoftwareFIMSWizeHive Zengine
Considered Multiple Products
IntelliGrants

No answer on this topic

FIMS
Chose FIMS
It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
Chose FIMS
MicroEdge was chosen for the foundation before I arrived. It had caused many problems and headaches since it was first implemented. Our Executive Director hated the software and spent five years convincing the Board of Directors to allow her to change it. Upon my departure, the …
WizeHive Zengine
Chose WizeHive Zengine
We selected WizeHive [Zengine] due to the flexibility and the customer management. We can always talk to someone.
Chose WizeHive Zengine
I wasn't a part of the selection decision
Chose WizeHive Zengine
Frankly, WizeHive Zengine was the best platform in the market when our non-profits were ready to move away from paper applications and archaic scholarship management. It continues to serve our needs, and we have not found a platform that offers something more attractive.
Chose WizeHive Zengine
Although Planstone was suggested to us as a more robust system than WizeHive, it was actually more difficult to use and did not meet our needs. We regret leaving WizeHive for Planstone.
Chose WizeHive Zengine
Compared to these, Zengine is on par with each of them. All of them offer pretty much the same functionality, although a couple of the others have a more user-friendly interface. Zengine is on par with pricing as well, similar to all of these. The difference comes in when you …
Chose WizeHive Zengine
I wasn't working with the USTA Florida team when they were using GIFTS, so I'm unable to compare. When I came into the organization they were already on their search to find a system to replace Blackbaud and had closed their grant applications for over a year since they didn't …
Chose WizeHive Zengine
SurveyMonkey and SurveyGizmo are great to use for other programs and events that require collecting fairly basic responses and feedback, however, these don't provide the level of information and data that is needed for our grants processes. WizeHive provides a number of tools …
Best Alternatives
IntelliGrants, from Agate SoftwareFIMSWizeHive Zengine
Small Businesses
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Submittable
Submittable
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Workday Financial Management
Workday Financial Management
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IntelliGrants, from Agate SoftwareFIMSWizeHive Zengine
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IntelliGrants, from Agate SoftwareFIMSWizeHive Zengine
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I believe a company starting out with a whole new database may take advantage of MicroEdge GIFTS. However, GIFTS would not work well for an organization which is transferring their old data onto the platform. GIFTS does not update well as time passes and data would most likely be lost and/or corrupted. I have not worked with the newest GIFTS online, so I do not know if that process would be smooth or not, but from what my coworkers told me upon hire, it seems GIFTS was very difficult to customize online. When attempting to use GIFTS online, our organization was told that we'd have to pay an invoice of several thousand dollars to change three words in a paragraph on the online system. Lastly, and most importantly, we found MicroEdge's customer service to be nearly impossible to reach, rude, and never helpful when help was sought out. Organizations which would need help with the program should not expect to be serviced in a timely or helpful manner.
Read full review
I highly recommend this software, as it has allowed us to be much more transparent with the delivery of benefits and their applications, also the hours of work in this regard are less, allowing staff to devote to other tasks. A very useful and necessary software.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • GIFTS Classics does a very good job of processing transactions. You can track workflow and enter/change important information along the lifecycle.
  • My favorite feature is the ability to select almost any field within the database and organize how it will be viewed, either within the system or when exported to Excel. You can relabel the column headers, sort, switch the order, stack fields, and capture all the information that will help in both processing and decision making.
  • I find the ability to create a wide range of templates that can then be generated and stored through the document manager tool to provide great efficiency and reduce opportunity for error.
Read full review
  • Grant application management can be daunting, but Zengine makes it a lot easier.
  • Combining the grant application, review process, and final reporting process in one portal is a huge convenience!
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • GIFTS system had many inherent bugs
  • Difficult to search for information in GIFTS
  • Customer support was difficult to reach
  • When reached, customer service was rude and unhelpful
  • GIFTS system could not put addresses in alphabetical order by country
  • Upon updates, GIFTS system would crash and data would become corrupted
  • GIFTS often would freeze and crash when exporting information to Excel
  • GIFTS would not allow for the deletion of certain program codes even when user had full administrative privileges
Read full review
  • Integration with other apps/software
  • More flexibility for custom application and form design
  • Enhanced options for using the data in the platform (ie: across forms)
  • Developed dashboard for administrators of the platform
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
We are so happy with the service that we just signed the contract for another year.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
The platform is very basic. On the other and, our staff does not take advantage of its full capabilities because such features did not work well for us/fit our needs
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I typically receive a response to an inquiry within an hour or two, if not sooner. Most tech support people are knowledgeable about our problems, and if not, they will escalate to the proper person.
Read full review
We didn’t really use their support. I wish they would have told us more about the fact they were changing to get rid of the flash player as that was the main reason we left.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Their design team gave us the option to save some money by creating the forms ourselves for both the submission and review portals. This also allowed us to get to a point where we felt very comfortable in any future changes that would need to be made to forms since we were so immersed in creating them.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
Read full review
SurveyMonkey and SurveyGizmo are great to use for other programs and events that require collecting fairly basic responses and feedback, however, these don't provide the level of information and data that is needed for our grants processes. WizeHive provides a number of tools and other benefits that are just beyond these products' capabilities
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Good reporting (by program area, geographic area, payments, and backgrounds) for close to 250 grants per year
  • Due to familiarity of program (MicroEdge), not too difficult to convert to new program of Blackbaud Grantmaking
Read full review
  • Helps keep all applications in one place
  • Can drain admin staff resources with troubleshooting
  • Allows us to see who starts, but doesn't complete application so we can follow up
Read full review
ScreenShots

WizeHive Zengine Screenshots

Screenshot of Admin DashboardScreenshot of Admin Data RviewScreenshot of Submission Portal