Agiloft offers contract lifecycle management (CLM) software, connecting contractual commitments to real business outcomes using its Data-first Agreement Platform (DAP). With contract data as the foundation, customers can collaboratively reach agreement and leverage contract visibility. Employing artificial intelligence as a legal force multiplier, and integration capabilities as a data liberator, organizations can use Agiloft’s certified implementers to deliver connected,…
N/A
Aurea Process
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
Oracle SOA Suite
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The rapid adoption of cloud-based applications by the enterprise, combined with organizations’ desire to integrate applications with mobile technologies, is dramatically increasing application integration complexity. Oracle SOA Suite 12c, the latest version of the company's unified application integration and SOA solution, offers a simplified cloud, mobile, on-premises and Internet of Things (IoT) integration capabilities within a single platform.
N/A
Pricing
Agiloft
Aurea Process
Oracle SOA Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License
$200,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agiloft
Aurea Process
Oracle SOA Suite
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agiloft
Aurea Process
Oracle SOA Suite
Features
Agiloft
Aurea Process
Oracle SOA Suite
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
9.5
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Contract creation
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract templates
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided logic
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
8.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Contract sharing
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract editing
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
7.7
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Contract database
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tracking contract status
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance check
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
7.4
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Contract Storage
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
E-Signatures
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.3
1 Ratings
38% below category average
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
5.8
1 Ratings
36% below category average
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Process designer
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
SOA support
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
-
Ratings
Aurea Process
4.0
1 Ratings
70% below category average
Oracle SOA Suite
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft is great for storing contracts and being able to run reports on those contracts. Where is lacks is when there are amendments to the contracts which change information that you will run a report on. Since the data doesn't stack, if I wanted to run a report on any agreement with unpaid time off and there was unpaid time off added in the first amendment but removed in the second amendment, the first amendment would still hit the report even though the unpaid time off was removed in a later amendment
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
Oracle service bus is great to quickly proxy any legacy services exposed as soap service. It's well suited for aggregating multiple services on a single endpoint. We can point to multiple endpoints on the business service and use a round-robin approach to access the endpoints. It's not well suited for data transformation and quick preview of mappings and transformations. It's not great on path to cloud transformation.
The Oracle Service Bus makes the management of web services extremely easy. Through its point and click interface, the web service endpoints can be easily modified.
The administration console provides useful dashboards to diagnose any service issues.
Message reporting tied to a database seems counter productive. Better options to eliminate that would not only minimize the maintenance hassle but also gives more ease to manage the product.
Polling feature isn't very efficient where the end point JMS queues may still have JMS connections despite not enabling the corresponding poller proxy services.
Unable to deploy multiple web services in one go from the OSB Web console.
We have had not many issues with Oracle Service Bus and it's very stable for our requirements. It's highly available and helps us implement Tier1 applications on it.
As with our brains, we only use 10% of its capability. It can be as complex as you want it to be or as simple. The training requirements to use it have been minimal depending on the application. This is really a reflection as to how the workflow was configured
It's an excellent enterprise service bus and has very stable features. We have been using it since 2008. We did hit into some issues. But, recreating the service helped fix many issues. Also, deployment to various environments was easy. Also, the plugin on Eclipse helps to build proxy and business services quick and easy.
Implementation was relatively easy and I have not had any issues with the support. UI change created some challenges for the end-users, but overall, it was a smooth experience. I hope the company will continue investing in the product and not consider it as something to not care about too much. I believe Agiloft does not make any other software, so I think the focus on it should not wane.
We had some issues with MQ connectivity through OSB and our experience was poor with the support team. They do respond. But, it felt like we are ignored and we had bad support. We had to escalate and things used to get dragged for weeks before we get more quality questions on how to pursue investigation.
Prior to implementing Agiloft, we used ProLaw. ProLaw acts as an electronic library for all contracts across the company. We were able to get this to work for us but it was limited in what functionality it provided. Agiloft is far superior when it comes to tracking and contract generation. Both systems store the agreements; however, Agiloft does a lot of the work for us. It creates the agreements with the click of a button, manages user permissions, sends automated reminders without requiring setup. These are all things ProLaw either didn't have or had but required manual entry. I was not the one who selected Agiloft as our new system, but after using it I can see why it was chosen.
As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.