Anaconda is an enterprise Python platform that provides access to open-source Python and R packages used in AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions are used by corporate, research, and academic institutions for competitive advantage and research.
$0
per month
Salesforce CRM Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce CRM Analytics (formerly Tableau CRM) is a cloud-based business intelligence solutions and analytics software. It provides users with automated data discovery, CRM-connected analytics, top-down views of data, augmented analytics, predictive insights, and customizable data visualization tools.
$125
per month
Pricing
Anaconda
Salesforce CRM Analytics
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Starter Tier
$15
per month per user
Business
$50
per month per user
Custom
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Anaconda
Salesforce CRM Analytics
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Users within organizations with 200+ employees/contractors (including Affiliates) require a paid Business license. Academic and non-profit research institutions may qualify for exemptions.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Anaconda
Salesforce CRM Analytics
Features
Anaconda
Salesforce CRM Analytics
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.3
25 Ratings
11% above category average
Salesforce CRM Analytics
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
9.822 Ratings
00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
8.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
9.721 Ratings
00 Ratings
MDM Integration
9.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
8.5
25 Ratings
1% above category average
Salesforce CRM Analytics
-
Ratings
Visualization
9.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
8.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.0
26 Ratings
10% above category average
Salesforce CRM Analytics
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
8.823 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
8.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Encryption
9.719 Ratings
00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
9.620 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.2
24 Ratings
9% above category average
Salesforce CRM Analytics
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
9.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
8.921 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
10.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
9.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.5
21 Ratings
11% above category average
Salesforce CRM Analytics
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls
9.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
-
Ratings
Salesforce CRM Analytics
7.8
48 Ratings
5% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
7.541 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
8.548 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.546 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
-
Ratings
Salesforce CRM Analytics
7.8
49 Ratings
3% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.548 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.548 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
7.537 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
7.546 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
-
Ratings
Salesforce CRM Analytics
8.1
47 Ratings
2% below category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
9.037 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
7.044 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.543 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.540 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
7.534 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
For us it really comes down to that book management and next best contact for our advisors. When we're thinking about a book of business that may range, depending on the advisor, from 400 clients to a thousand clients, how do they really optimize their time? Who do they call next? Who do they work with to make sure not only they're keeping those clients engaged, they're not leaving the firm going to other advisors who they haven't talked to in a while who might need their attention. That's really where that CRM analytics is really proven pretty powerful for us.
Anaconda is a one-stop destination for important data science and programming tools such as Jupyter, Spider, R etc.
Anaconda command prompt gave flexibility to use and install multiple libraries in Python easily.
Jupyter Notebook, a famous Anaconda product is still one of the best and easy to use product for students like me out there who want to practice coding without spending too much money.
I used R Studio for building Machine Learning models, Many times when I tried to run the entire code together the software would crash. It would lead to loss of data and changes I made.
Implementation takes time and resources. It is a heavy lift to implement and at first, it can take a little bit of time to understand what you are looking at. But once it's implemented it's easy to get started.
Without any BI expertise or resources available to your organization, the implementation of this is difficult. If you aren't used to BI tools and don't have an expert in house, the terminology can be difficult to understand at first.
Their support is not on hand to help you if you encounter any issues, at least not on all the plans or the basic plans. Real-time support service is an add-on, so you'll need to be patient if you require help or pay extra money.
More functionality for the tool is needed to compete with other heavyweights in the arena like Tableau, Qlik, and Microstrategy. Still lacks the robustness, functionality, and flexibility other competing products possess.
It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
For someone who don't have coding background, this could be a useful tool and fairly easy to learn and use given the good support. However, if you know other open source tools, it would be much easier to use the other tools and the knowledge is more transferable in the future.
Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
I was not able to be in interaction much with Salesforce support team since every feature works the way it should be working. So far I have not experienced any bug or major glitches that would delay the result of my work and performance. There is also a hotline in our company for Salesforce issue but so far I have not used it.
An implementation partner would certainly result in greater output in a more efficient amount of time. However, I have found implementation partners to be extremely expensive for the output received (at least working for a non-profit company they are frequently unaffordable). Internal implementation does help with usable output though since internal knowledge would better know the data architecture and business processes
I have experience using RStudio oustide of Anaconda. RStudio can be installed via anaconda, but I like to use RStudio separate from Anaconda when I am worin in R. I tend to use Anaconda for python and RStudio for working in R. Although installing libraries and packages can sometimes be tricky with both RStudio and Anaconda, I like installing R packages via RStudio. However, for anything python-related, Anaconda is my go to!
Tableau is the absolute top of the class when it comes to business intelligence, but it doesn't make sense for every business case. In our case, we needed a simple data visualization platform for our CRM platform and sales pipeline. Salesforce Analytics, while nowhere near as robust, did the job we needed it to do perfectly in a significantly more cost-effective manner.
It has helped our organization to work collectively faster by using Anaconda's collaborative capabilities and adding other collaboration tools over.
By having an easy access and immediate use of libraries, developing times has decreased more than 20 %
There's an enormous data scientist shortage. Since Anaconda is very easy to use, we have to be able to convert several professionals into the data scientist. This is especially true for an economist, and this my case. I convert myself to Data Scientist thanks to my econometrics knowledge applied with Anaconda.
I would say it's been positive just because as a company, anyone that has access to it can go in there and pull any company information and we're very up to date then on all of our client base. So I would say it's been a very positive impact.