TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Apigee Edge

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AApigee Edge is an API management platform now owned and offered by Google, since Google acquired Apigee in 2016.N/A

    PingOne from Ping Identity

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AThe PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…

    $20,000

    per year

    Pricing
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Essential
    $20,000
    per year
    Plus
    $40,000
    per year
    Premium
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Ping Identity
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    API Management
    Comparison of API Management features of Apigee Edge and PingOne from Ping Identity
    Feature
    Apigee Edge
    9.4
    7 Ratings
    11% above category average
    PingOne from Ping Identity
    -
    Ratings
    API access control9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Rate limits and usage policies9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    API usage data9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    API user onboarding9.97 Ratings00 Ratings
    API versioning9.97 Ratings00 Ratings
    Usage billing and payments9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    API monitoring and logging9.97 Ratings00 Ratings
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Apigee Edge and PingOne from Ping Identity
    Feature
    Apigee Edge
    -
    Ratings
    PingOne from Ping Identity
    9.1
    10 Ratings
    10% above category average
    ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings9.38 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings9.710 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings9.310 Ratings
    Password Management00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    ID Risk Management00 Ratings8.56 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    Small Businesses
    Amazon API Gateway
    Score7.2 out of 10
    JumpCloud
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure API Management
    Score9.1 out of 10
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OCI API Management
    Score7.9 out of 10
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    9.0
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Apigee EdgePingOne from Ping Identity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Few scenarios 1. For viewing API analytics, I think it is best in the market 2. For earning money via API monetization 3. Securing API 4. Onboarding legacy APIs to provide modern REST endpoints
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Better exception handling with the Raise exception policies help to monitor the flow by setting up the flow conditions.
    • Easy development of a Proxy and APIs with much less tutoring and helps make getting started for new users easy.
    • Very good documentation and blog with details of most common failures and error handling.
    • A very very easy to use console.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
    • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
    • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Only one user can be active in a proxy at a time
    • No version control
    • Prohibited from using JSON.stringify on Apigee objects (tokens)
    • Debugging is difficult
    • Unable to rename or delete policies without bumping revision
    • Why would anyone give a js policy one name, display name something else, and script a different name?
    • 'Trace' limited to only 20 transactions
    • UI allows users to add target servers, but users must utilize the api to turn on SSL.
    • I'm sure there's more, they just aren't coming to mind right now.
    • Apigee forgets (expires?) your password at random intervals without notice. Every few weeks, or days, sometimes even three times in one day, I'll attempt to login to Apigee and my password will be 'wrong'. I've reset my password and Apigee still claims it's wrong. I've had to reset my password three times before it finally let me log back in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    • PingID has some limitations when used as the MFA for some LDAP implementations. You need to use it as a RADIUS password credential validator to solve for some of those limitations, which in turn causes challenges with our ephemeral cloud deployment model of PingFederate.
    • The basic logon services within PingFederate are adequate and well-documented, but simple features like disabling user input after entering credentials would help with some of the additional customization required to support real world failure modes.
    • PingCentral authorization models and configuration remain unpolished compared to other products, and now the features seem to be shifting toward onboarding PingAccess and PingDirectory over improving baseline administrative functionality/operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    I am not the one deciding whether to use apigee or not really. But personally, I would recommend the use of it as developing APIs on it is easy. And as a mediator between backend servers, we could easily modify request and responses in it without touching any backend code while having a centralize gateway to access our backend APIs too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Google
    Support has helped us to resolved all the queries and community support was also good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    Ping's solutions are a powerful tool, but with that comes the need for skills to operate them. It's not easy for inexperienced engineers to run. From the end-user perspective, it is fully customizable and can be as seamless as you need.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    Quite hard to get support, at least on the coding side, when we encounter blockers. But general concerns, they would schedule a call to you for them to get a whole picture of your concern. Albeit in my experience, bad really as they haven't replied about the progress, but otherwise seems to have been fixed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    Really good customer support, we always receive what we need. Sometimes instead of [a] solution (which have to be developed) we are receiving [a] work around, which is helping ad hoc. Then after time [needed for support to] develop fix we are receiving full fix or we [are] just waiting for new version of the product where our "bugs" are fixed.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Apigee is the best in the market in terms of API Analytics Apigee is having wonderful Documentation with short videos Security is a major concern and Apigee provides an easily configurable policy to secure API Quota and rate-limit is again very easy to configure on every API basis It provides various policies to transform the response from one form to another form e.g. JSON to XML or XML to JSON
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    PingOne from Ping Identity is the clear winner here. I can say this because the cost of their service is very worth it, and their service offers more than their competitors. In addition to that, this software is still improving daily, which only means that there is still more to come, and their Developers are giving their fair share of service to keep their software the best.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • As a public entity it is hard to say how much ROI we can have. We have yet to create a billing and ROI plan. We are thinking of other ways to create ROI, possibly through data/service barter.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ping Identity
    • The TCO for our deployment of Ping will be over a million dollars/year less to operate compared to the systems it replaces.
    • Moving the organization to federated protocols allows greater flexibility in our cloud migration strategy and zero trust designs.
    • Operating with federated protocols internally facilitates M&A and divestiture activities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots