Appium vs. Splunk On-Call

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appium
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Splunk On-Call
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
Formerly known as VictorOps, Splunk On-Call is an incident response system for developers, devops and operations teams that helps reduce outage time.N/A
Pricing
AppiumSplunk On-Call
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppiumSplunk On-Call
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppiumSplunk On-Call
Best Alternatives
AppiumSplunk On-Call
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Freshservice
Freshservice
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Freshservice
Freshservice
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppiumSplunk On-Call
Likelihood to Recommend
9.8
(10 ratings)
6.0
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppiumSplunk On-Call
Likelihood to Recommend
JS Foundation
1. It's open source which supports range of languages, operating systems and languages. Well suited for Android and IOS mobile automation. Supports all kinds of apps, which makes it flexible and robust mobile testing tool 2. It is less appropriate where we need intercept network call to verify the API calls. Extensive coding experience is required to work Appium
Read full review
Cisco
I recommend Splunk on-call is more suited where there are high incident queues; multiple teams need to be involved in handling a P1 severity issue. Multiple levels of escalation are needed environment where automated action is required. I recommend the solution for large-scale & medium-scale business units. For small-scale business units, I see the functional value is less.
Read full review
Pros
JS Foundation
  • It uses WebDriver API so it makes it easy to use for former web test automation engineers.
  • It can be managed via the command line via an extensive set of parameters.
  • It handles implicit waits at the server side that is especially valuable in distributed infrastructure.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Easily assign work/tickets between multiple users
  • Supports a wide variety of software integrations
  • Easy to manage scheduling tool
  • As part of the Splunk toolset, provides detailed levels of data analysis at our engineers fingertips
Read full review
Cons
JS Foundation
  • Element browser sometimes is unreliable and has sporadic fails.
  • Appium running is a bit slow, compared to tests written with Appium and with Espresso or XCTest.
Read full review
Cisco
  • The user interface can be furthe improved
  • Licensing needs to be simplified and packaged as a bundle with other Splunk product like Enterprise Security
  • Customer outreach can be further enhanced
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
JS Foundation
I am rating 10/10 because Appium can use with multiple programming languages with multiple Test engines. Also, it works for both Android and iOS.
Read full review
Cisco
It was a good solution with a good comprimise prize/features for our use cases
Read full review
Usability
JS Foundation
I would like to give 9/10 rating to Appium because of it can easily integrate with popular frameworks and CI/CD tools, as well as it is reliable, flexible and easy to use. The setup can bit complex in initial step, but once on configured it's very easy to use and enables stable and scalable mobile automation for real and cloud devices.
Read full review
Cisco
Not a lot of love given to VO since the acquisition by Splunk from my POV
Read full review
Support Rating
JS Foundation
No answers on this topic
Cisco
VictorOps support has proven excellent for us. Because it is such a widely used tool, there is a lot of documentation on usage, and a large community of users to lean on. Also, many engineers have had experience working with VictorOps already, and the tool is so easy to setup / manage that much support isn't really necessary.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
JS Foundation
No answers on this topic
Cisco
It was a good solution with a good comprimise prize/features for our use cases
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
JS Foundation
If you're an Apple developer, you use Xcode. It's practically a forced necessity. For system testing though, it doesn't have to be. You can have your development team focus on unit and integration tests in their platform and another team automate acceptance tests with a language they are more familiar with.
Read full review
Cisco
Splunk On-Call integrates better with our Splunk Cybersecurity and Reporting products due to the same family tree of the same eco system. We were previously using built-in on-call from individual applications and while adequate, they were difficult to manage and support SLA varied greatly across different applications. In addition we also used xMatters which did not integrate well with SAP products nor Citrix products so we were still using more than a single on-call product which was solved by implementing Splunk On-Call
Read full review
Return on Investment
JS Foundation
  • Appium is open source, so it's free. That's budget friendly right there.
  • The ability to write mobile automation tests has saved considerable time for our manual test team, but that is true with most automation tests.
  • We use Sauce Labs with our other automation, but Appium works great with Sauce Labs, as well, if I needed to run on emulators and simulators.
Read full review
Cisco
  • It runs our on call rotation so it makes it easy for us.
  • It integrates with Slack so it makes it easy for us to manage through Slack.
Read full review
ScreenShots