Arc XP vs. Contentstack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arc XP
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Arc XP’s cloud-native tools help organizations create and distribute content, monetize websites and drive ecommerce, and deliver multichannel experiences. With a modular architecture built on AWS, Arc XP’s integrated ecosystem includes an agile content management system (CMS), a suite of digital subscription tools, a built-in DAM and video platform, and a hosted and managed low-code front-end experience platform. Built for flexibility, Arc XP’s agile CMS can be integrated into an existing…N/A
Contentstack
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.N/A
Pricing
Arc XPContentstack
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arc XPContentstack
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arc XPContentstack
Features
Arc XPContentstack
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.0
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Contentstack
7.4
11 Ratings
10% below category average
Role-based user permissions9.01 Ratings7.411 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.5
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Contentstack
7.5
10 Ratings
3% below category average
API10.01 Ratings8.19 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language9.01 Ratings6.98 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.2
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Contentstack
8.1
12 Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor10.01 Ratings8.12 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Admin section8.01 Ratings7.712 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design10.01 Ratings6.69 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.01 Ratings6.910 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
10.0
1 Ratings
39% above category average
Contentstack
6.4
12 Ratings
15% below category average
Content taxonomy10.01 Ratings7.210 Ratings
SEO support10.01 Ratings6.410 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings5.89 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings6.58 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings6.16 Ratings
Digital Experience Platform
Comparison of Digital Experience Platform features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.1
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
Cloud enablement10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content aggregation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content classification7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
DXP Third-Party Integrations10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-website management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Digital asset management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Editorial workflows and task management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arc XPContentstack
Small Businesses
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.9 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arc XPContentstack
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(12 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arc XPContentstack
Likelihood to Recommend
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
Arc XP is the state-of-the-art cloud based CMS for news publishing. It's well suited for large to medium organizations that want a robust, secure and scalable platform. Depending on the use case, it may still require a development team to maintain and make changes to the sites the CMS powers.
Read full review
Contentstack
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Read full review
Pros
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
  • Enables content creation and curation
  • Content distribution. Web and APIs
  • Easy to use development framework with good documentation and support
Read full review
Contentstack
  • Enables us to build and architect content through the use of their easy to use software and user interface.
  • Customer service has been by far the most reliable and responsive in any vendor i've dealt with.
  • Listens to feedback and builds features and technical improvements that helps customers usability and experience.
Read full review
Cons
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
  • The CMS lacks a responsive design web interface or a good native app alternative.
  • It's heavily dependent on the AWS infrastructure and a disruption of the AWS service can cause serious problems
Read full review
Contentstack
  • In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
  • In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
  • Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
Read full review
Support Rating
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
No answers on this topic
Contentstack
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
No answers on this topic
Contentstack
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Read full review
Return on Investment
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
  • After the implementation of the CMS, the development team started focusing more on developing new features for the site than maintaining the CMS and the infrastructure. 100% of the work is now focused on creating value to the customer.
Read full review
Contentstack
  • Saved significant amounts of money that would previously been spent on 3rd party agencies to build websites
  • Empowered Comms teams to create and edit the design and content of their own websites on demand rather than relying on the Dev team
  • Allowed the Development team to concentrate on building functionality rather than websites, so we can focus on improvement rather than BAU work.
Read full review
ScreenShots