Archer offers a platform for holistic integrated risk management solutions that empower enterprise organizations to more effectively manage risk, ensure compliance, and address emerging challenges.
N/A
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
Score7.8 out of 10
N/A
Bitsight provides comprehensive, AI-accelerated visibility into your vendors, assets, and digital footprint of every third party (and beyond) in your network, whether you work with them directly or indirectly.
N/A
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score8.5 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
9.5
13 Ratings
24% above category average
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items
8.712 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk management
10.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems
8.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
GRC policy management
9.913 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Incident management
10.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
10 Ratings
7% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.58 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
7.4
24 Ratings
5% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.623 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.123 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.17 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.716 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.4
15 Ratings
17% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.910 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.913 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.712 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.911 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.1
9 Ratings
19% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
5.08 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.16 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
49 Ratings
4% above category average
Long-term financial planning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.235 Ratings
Financial budgeting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.143 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.240 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.634 Ratings
Management reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.046 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.8
46 Ratings
12% above category average
Financial data consolidation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.940 Ratings
Journal entries and reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.337 Ratings
Multi-currency management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.334 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.337 Ratings
Minority Ownership
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.730 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.944 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.236 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.0
50 Ratings
10% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.042 Ratings
Management Reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.947 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.150 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.035 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.920 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Feature
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
-
Ratings
Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
31 Ratings
8% above category average
Personalized dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.426 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
KPIs
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.624 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.322 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.014 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform and Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
RSA Archer is fantastic at cataloguing, personalizing assessments, raw reporting, and capacity to add custom fields. It is a little clunky around adding contextual information to notifications, peeking into data before attempting to load pages, quick navigation or determining linked (or sub-linked) relationships. These are all concerns that can either be worked around with an appropriate data scheme or with careful administration of the sub-routines.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you are considering BitSight Security Ratings as a portion or bulk of a larger vendor management project you will be well served in letting the risk scores be an indication of how closely you need to examine a vendor. However, you should not base your assessment solely on the risk score provided. The risk score is based on publicly available data and can be inaccurate.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
Integration capabilities to multiple enterprise systems
Control standards and Procedures to address multiple regulatory/authoritative sources, standards and frameworks enabling test once satisfy many requiremnts
Rapid application development and User friendly tool with configuration capability to customize easily without user requiring programming or coding skills
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Since data is based on public registration IP and domain data can be stale depending on ISP/Domain registration update delays.
Correcting a false detection is a month-long endeavor and requires the company with the impacted score to clean up BitSight's data.
Customer service for incorrect data is convoluted and requires a deep understanding of domain registration to correct the data. The responsibility for correcting data is placed solely on the customer's shoulders.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
Good tool to get the information communicated, approval workflow, and easy to add new findings/questionnaires. Seems to be compatible with different browsers and little downtime. Only request for improvement is to add an export feature with fewer clicks. Maybe batch export.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Great look and feel, intuitive in most modules, and has great features to gather the right info and process it at high speed. Good and usefull dashboards for our own, and has also proved to be very good when you are on the vendor side of the solution and need to send info to your customers
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our RSA Archer team is dedicated to finding solutions for our organization. They haven't mentioned any issues with receiving support with deployment or bug fixes, and generally the platform is very dependable. They are always very excited about delivering a version upgrade and presenting any new features that provide more dashboards or chart types.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It has been roughly 5 years since I have seen Securevue, so a lot can change, but to me it felt like several products were purchased and an attempt was made to piece them all together into a single solution (and I believe that may have been true). It also required agents on endpoints which did not fit the model I believed customers were looking for. MetricStream appeared to be difficult to install as it took their own engineers some time to get it installed in my lab environment. I did not think their web interface was as intuitive as RSA Archer. Customization to the platform was possible to some degree, but required a lot more work and technical skills than required by Archer. I did like the landing page for MetricStream which called out the important action items for the current user, but Archer v6.X now has this feature.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We evalauted Security Scorecard as another option at some point, the tools have many similar features when we analyze them, basically we had a great deal with our regular security partners and finally decided for Bitsight, but to be honest we did not have a deep proof of concept on other platforms, Bitsight was just what we were looking for.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.