HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Aruba Networks offers wireless WAN.N/A
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Meraki MR Series is a wireless LAN solution.N/A
Pricing
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WANCisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WANCisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WANCisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Considered Both Products
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WAN

No answer on this topic

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Chose Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points are very easy to install, configure, and manage. Centralized management offers excellent features, and especially if you have multiple locations where the access points are installed, they're very easy to manage, saving you a lot of time. …
Best Alternatives
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WANCisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi Cloud
WatchGuard Secure Wi-Fi Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Meraki MG
Cisco Meraki MG
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points (discontinued)
Cisco Aironet 1800 Series Access Points (discontinued)
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WANCisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(7 ratings)
9.1
(142 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(26 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(82 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE Aruba Networks Wireless WANCisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is an excellent solution for small to medium-sized implementation, especially on-premise. The ability to centrally manage all policy-based access requirements for both registered users as well as guests using the portal is effortless. This is backed up by good documentation which is available and excellent vendor support (HP).
Read full review
Cisco
It's ideal if the company frequently uses mobile devices that need to work on Wi-Fi. It's also ideal if a company has multiple locations. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points can then be easily deployed and managed via a central Meraki Dashboard. It also offers a powerful content filtering feature within the Cisco Meraki environment. This can be particularly useful for guest networks and in locations where certain content cannot be downloaded, such as a school.It's less suitable if a company has a limited IT budget and the network needs to be continuously expanded. In those cases, the associated license costs can quickly add up. In factories or other robustly built environments, RF tuning isn't feasible. As a result, the signal quality can sometimes be somewhat reduced.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • modern and high-tech Wireless access points
  • Faster and more secure data
  • One unified gui providing information for the whole wireless network.
Read full review
Cisco
  • It's cloud based, so as long as we have an internet connection, we can access it. Whenever we push a change, it's one stop like a single pane of glass to manage all our equipment. And so that's what I liked about it.
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Licensing is slightly complicated and not bundled, separate costs for cloud controller is a no-no.
  • UI needs an uplift.
  • Coverage is good but can be better.
Read full review
Cisco
  • It can expand its radio range in terms of distance reach
  • It can improve it's design as it looks like a plain flat brick
  • I would like to see more integration with security
  • Better solution in segmenting and authentication like clearpass
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
It is a solution that works very well. It is almost like setup and forget, since the solution works. When issues occur, documentation is available with detailed steps on how to solve this problems you are facing, of course Technical Support is always ready to help. We have had instances where an Access Point fails and within 2 days we have the replacement
Read full review
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
The unified network cloud webpage offers many visibilities for the entire network. From routers, SDWAN and SDWAN edges to check and monitor each interface for failover. Aruba usually provide credit for learning, and this will help give the admin more visibility to use and manage the entire network from the single point of cloud based web Gui
Read full review
Cisco
To get basic functionality doesn't take long. Set up a new Meraki Dashboard activate the licenses and get internet connection for the APs and you are more or less done. The Dashboard will find your items and you're good to go.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
We have been deploying Meraki since last 8 years and even the first one deployed seems to be working fine till now!
Read full review
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
In the least concern we have, the support team has always been available and responds very quickly.
Read full review
Cisco
We have not had any issues with the Meraki WiFi Access Point hardware but we did encounter a problem with a Meraki LAN switch that failed to power up. Upon a email into the Meraki Support, they promptly called back and we went over some quick tests to determine a power supply problem. A replacement LAN switch was sent to me the next day.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
There were documents that detailed how the WiFi Access Point was to be installed and mounted. The only issue was to cable the device, we use a third party for this type of work and typically has to be performed after normal business hours. Other than that, the installation was easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
We used Xirrus wifi before we moved to Aruba. Xirrus is a great niche brand that has been sold to other companies a few times in the life we used the products. This negatively impacted the product availability in our country, local support, and amount of implementation partners. Due to Aruba their broad product range, availability in the market, and knowledge with implementation partners we feel that we can build upon their products not only for a product cycle but for the decade to come.
Read full review
Cisco
We were more on a Cisco Wireless Controller set up, which takes a lot longer to control and that's why we've actually gone through a cloud-based product, which is very easy compared with the old traditional way that we used to have. It's more ease of software. They've got very similar features, but it's easy to set up and maintain into the future.
Read full review
Scalability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
As far as I know, it's 10. I mean, because like I said, I manage stuff in the south. I have coworkers that manage it in the north. And so the scalability of it to be able to be go in and see the configurations of the ones in the north as well as they can see in the south. So across the board, it works really well for how widespread out it is.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • We have better coverage for our visitors and during trainings
  • We have enough bandwidth to accommodate everyone
  • No more dead spots in the building that effects our users.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Uptime has improved significantly. The dashboard automatically keeps devices up to date by scheduling upgrades at remote times (say 2am on a Sunday)
  • Swapping to Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points has reduced the management overhead. No more long controller software hardware upgrades and obviously no more need for beefy central controllers.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points Screenshots

Screenshot of MR57 Cisco Meraki Access Point