Asana is a web and mobile project management app. With tasks, projects, conversations, and dashboards, Asana lets an entire team know who's doing what by when, enabling workload balancing. Users can also add integrations for GANTT charts, time tracking and more.
$13.49
per month per user
Delibr
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Delibr is an outlining tool for feauture refinement created for Product Managers. With Delibr the user can easily visualize conversations about features, create and keep track of tasks, create Jira issues, make notes and turn them into presentations.
$50
per 10 users, 5$ for additional users
Micro Focus Caliber (discontinued)
Score 1.3 out of 10
N/A
Caliber by Micro Focus (formerly Borland Caliber), is an application requirement management offering. It has been discontinued, but similar capabilities are supplied by Micro Focus by Dimensions RM.
N/A
Pricing
Asana
Delibr
Micro Focus Caliber (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Starter
$13.49
per month per user
Advanced
$30.49
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Personal
Free
Premium Plan
50$
per 10 users, 5$ for additional users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Asana
Delibr
Micro Focus Caliber (discontinued)
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
A discount is offered for annual billing.
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Asana
Delibr
Micro Focus Caliber (discontinued)
Features
Asana
Delibr
Micro Focus Caliber (discontinued)
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Asana
8.4
179 Ratings
9% above category average
Delibr
-
Ratings
Micro Focus Caliber (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Task Management
9.2179 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.1152 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
9.261 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.4162 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
9.2132 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
9.4178 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
8.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
8.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
8.5150 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
8.6142 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.8149 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
6.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
7.177 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
The usability of Asana is broad since it's available in a variety of platforms that are widely used nowadays. I think that it would be great for people who are constantly on the move and switching devices, since it has allowed me to work from my phone, too. I also think that Asana has proven itself to handle a large quantity of work
Delibr is great for tracking customer feedback and sharing specific sections of a document with stakeholders. It has useful formatting tools and decision tracking that can be embedded right into the document so you can revisit when/why something was decided. Collaboration tools are easy to use and intuitive. I've found it helpful for requirements, planning, feedback sessions, and support/technical documentation for internal users.
I personally would prefer other products on the market right now such as Microsoft Team Foundation Server and Test Manager. I think having a product like Caliber that can only do requirements without integrating with a another system makes things a little more time consuming.
Through it, we were able to communicate and cooperate with the rest of the team to complete the work in the required manner and at the appropriate time.
Borland Caliber tracks functional and non-functional requirements pretty easily. You can easily add a requirement and attach a spreadsheet or a picture if needed.
Moving the hierarchy of requirements is fairly easy by just dragging and dropping.
Assigning users to approve requirements is simple by the fields included when adding a requirement and then submitting for review.
I think Borland Caliber visually needs to be updated. It looks very out of date compared to other products on the market. The text box has a notepad feel to it and it's hard to make it visually catching.
Borland Caliber needs to be easier to integrate with other testing and development products on the market.
Having fields more related to URS and FRS would be helpful to auto-link to a document. So enter in a URS or FRS document ID at the beginning of a project in Caliber and then auto-assigning requirement IDs to link to pieces of code or test cases and having the user be able to decide a naming convention.
Borland Caliber needs a specific table for linking to a document ID and then each requirement could auto-generate a sub ID for each requirement to make the process of filling in User Requirements and Functional Requirements more efficient. Then the user should be able to modify the sub ID if the naming convention needed to be different.
It is very user-friendly. Takes a new employee an hour to start figuring out how the system works. That's an important factor. You don't want to encounter the issue where employees need a week to understand how the system works. For example, JIRA, I tried using it for a week and I still don't understand the complicated layout. Asana has a simple interface. Once you see it, you get it type of program.
I haven't had to use their support so I can't rate it. The fact that I haven't needed them reflects the ease of use of the product. I would recommend that any new users schedule a complete demo of the product to ensure that they are using it to it's fullest (there's a lot of useful features).
Asana is a top-tier project management software that helps us organize and track projects from start to finish. It allows us to apply tasks/to-dos to multiple projects without duplication, divide complex projects into smaller tasks, and track project progress. It also helps us organize work on Kanban boards or linear lists. It stands out from the crowd in a big way compared to the competition.
I think Borland Caliber is better than Atlassian Confluence and has way more options for ease of use and reporting. Team Foundation Server is my personal choice as it comes as a package for developers to link to requirements easily and link to test cases. Borland Caliber is visually the least attractive of the three systems I have used. If you need just a requirement manager for tracking and reporting then Borland Caliber is a great choice.