AtomicWriter vs. Contentstack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AtomicWriter
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
AtomicWriter helps users create original content optimized to maximize visibility for content marketing campaigns.N/A
Contentstack
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.N/A
Pricing
AtomicWriterContentstack
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AtomicWriterContentstack
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AtomicWriterContentstack
Considered Both Products
AtomicWriter

No answer on this topic

Contentstack
Chose Contentstack
Contentstack is very user-friendly and modern.
Chose Contentstack
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that …
Chose Contentstack
When we wanted to move to headless we took a look and tested some of the offerings available for headless CMS. Many do have similar features and services and so for us it came down to how Contentstack built a business relationship and service around their clients. We were given …
Chose Contentstack
Featurewise, there's not a lot that separates these CMSs, and it's hard to assess in a SW selection phase exactly how the products stack up against each other. Ultimately, the choice of Contentstack came down to the dialogue with the sales rep.
Chose Contentstack
Before deciding on Contentstack, we researched some tools, we chose it because of the ease of creating and changing content, the API options for querying content, the ease of modeling new content APIs, high capacity of the CDN to deliver content, ease of integration with other …
Features
AtomicWriterContentstack
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
10.0
Ratings
24% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
Ideation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval workflows10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content collaboration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content calendar10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
9.4
Ratings
18% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
Content hub10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content distribution9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content automation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitive analytics8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
-
Ratings
Contentstack
7.4
Ratings
10% below category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
-
Ratings
Contentstack
7.5
Ratings
4% below category average
API00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
-
Ratings
Contentstack
8.1
Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
-
Ratings
Contentstack
6.4
Ratings
16% below category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AtomicWriterContentstack
Small Businesses
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
CoSchedule Marketing Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AtomicWriterContentstack
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AtomicWriterContentstack
Likelihood to Recommend
AtomicWriter is especially suitable for blog writing and for this type of work. It also gives different formats and restructures it with a great view. I think that's it.
Read full review
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Read full review
Pros
  • Makes my writing awesome.
  • Restructures it.
  • Gives me different writing formats.
Read full review
  • The user interface is intuitive and cleanly designed.
  • The functionality is flexible which allows us to build our own application behind the CMS that meets business needs without being restricted by limitations in the CMS.
  • The service we get from our Account Manager and Technical contacts is excellent.
Read full review
Cons
  • Nothing too bad.
  • Needs more features.
  • Should be less expensive.
Read full review
  • In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
  • In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
  • Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Nothing at all
  • -
  • -
Read full review
  • We are able to prepare for large campaigns within a few days which can bel rolled our within a few clicks. This was previously never possible before we moved to Contentstack.
  • We now have the tools and ability to architect in a way to take advantage of SEO and drive traffic. Our blog now serves more traffic that the rest of our website. This SEO effort wasn't possible before Contentstack.
  • One of our KPI's for moving to headless was a faster website and we now deliver pages under our original target while serving more asset and content rich pages to visitors
Read full review
ScreenShots