Attivo BOTsink vs. Symantec Endpoint Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Attivo BOTsink
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
As a network-based threat detection solution, Attivo BOTsink stands guard inside the business network, using high-interaction deception and decoy technology to lure attackers into engaging and revealing themselves. Through misdirection of the attack, the vendor states organizations gain the advantage of time to detect, analyze, and stop an attacker.N/A
Symantec Endpoint Security
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Symantec Endpoint Protection is the company's flagship antivirus / endpoint security product.N/A
Pricing
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Attivo BOTsink
-
Ratings
Symantec Endpoint Security
8.6
36 Ratings
2% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.530 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.233 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings8.534 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings8.125 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings7.534 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.931 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings9.234 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.6 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
Score 8.6 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(2 ratings)
8.5
(63 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(11 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Attivo BOTsinkSymantec Endpoint Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Attivo Networks
It is best suited when deployed at perimeter and integrated with SIEM and SOAR solution. It will be able to replicate assets and display realistic configurations making difficult for hackers. We were able to avoid or block 40% of attacks targetted to our critical servers and could easily identify threat actors.
Read full review
Broadcom
Symantec Endpoint Security is a well-rounded product that provides a significant amount of functionality and covers many of our endpoint needs without needing to resort to multiple vendors that might clash in unpredictable ways when ultimately deployed to the endpoints in our estate. The default policies are adequate and tuning these requires some time as with all similar EDR products but the product is flexible enough to allow very granular whitelisting/blacklisting which is great. Low resource requirements are also fantastic and we've not had many complaints from developers who were getting slowed down when compiling complex code with other previous solutions.
Read full review
Pros
Attivo Networks
  • Identifies devices
  • Provides threat details in real time
  • Provides network topology with potential threat paths
Read full review
Broadcom
  • The virus and spyware protection has worked well for us, catching several things and quarantining the items or cleaning them.
  • The virus definitions very rarely fail to update for the users, so I feel confident that my client machines are kept up to date.
  • I like the report I get daily telling me about threats found and action taken without having to login to the console to look it up myself.
Read full review
Cons
Attivo Networks
  • More fine tuning of threat detection capabilities needed
  • Users should be able to modify AIML configuration
  • Improving the display dashboard
Read full review
Broadcom
  • The system should have a better ability to auto repair, if an item is malfunctioning it should auto reinstall.
  • The cloud platform and the server do not talk well to each other and it would be great to get the same data on both platforms, this may be due to version though.
  • It seems the whitelisting on the cloud platform could use some work.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Attivo Networks
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
Best of Breed. Symantec Endpoint Protection beats all other end point products I have used, tested and seen in presentation at this point in time.
Read full review
Usability
Attivo Networks
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
I think it works great. It's easy to administer. It's easy to see if it's working and how well. There's no real user interaction necessary.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Attivo Networks
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
We've used it for years and the software is easy to use. The dashboard is easy to read, and you can easily figure out where to go to troubleshoot or deploy software. Symantec is there for emergencies like backup restoration or file retrieval. It's pretty low maintenance. Symantec is there when your IT infrastructure needs it
Read full review
Support Rating
Attivo Networks
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
Support is completely awful! You can never get anyone to help if you can even find a number to call. The support web portal is a joke and their response time if you're even able to submit a ticket is ridiculously slow.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Attivo Networks
No answers on this topic
Broadcom
Use a third party deployment tool and not the deployment option within the SEP Manager itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Attivo Networks
Attivo BoTsink was selected based on cost price and wide coverage of detection capabilities. Our decision was primarily based on reducing efforts to identify and mitigation of attacks. The ease of deployment was additional factor in decision making. As compared to Zscaler Deception and SentinelOne Singularity I found Attivo BoTsink detects more threats
Read full review
Broadcom
Symantec Endpoint Security offers very similar features to the above products, they all do the same thing in terms of protecting your endpoints against cybersecurity threats. Installation wise the products all install from a central management system and report back to this for central reporting. Ultimately we choose Symantec as the reseller was able to offer additional incentives which made their pricing very competitive.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Attivo Networks
  • Advanced reporting has saved from hiring additional personnel to monitor security threats
  • Real time identification of threats saves response time from actual breach
  • Third-party needed to be leveraged to help configure Attivo BOTsink
Read full review
Broadcom
  • The ROI from deploying this has led to fewer security issues which reduces costs.
  • Keeping track of security issues and how the were remedied is easier.
  • Deskside support can work with end users easily if something is triggered and this allows us to not have to overstaff.
Read full review
ScreenShots