Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aurea Process
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Aurea Process (formerly CX Process) from Aurea Software in Austin is a business process management offering, based on Savvion BPM.
$200,000
per year
Alfresco
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The Alfresco platform, from Hyland, delivers comprehensive cloud-native content services. It is used to intelligently activate processes and content to accelerate the flow of business.N/A
VectorViewer PDF Editor
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
VectorViewer's PDF Editor works in conjunction with the Fillable Forms solution and empowers the users with a tool that allows to create a new PDF Form or edit an existing PDF Form. The online editor has drag and drop functionality using which new form fields can be added and existing ones can be updated. VectorViewer's smart PDF Engine enables users to convert any standard…N/A
Pricing
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Editions & Modules
License
$200,000
per year
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Considered Multiple Products
Aurea Process

No answer on this topic

Alfresco
Chose Alfresco
Nextcloud is good for it's intended use case but because Nextcloud has an AGPL license, that limited what we could do with our Proprietary solution, where's Alfresco LGPL is more flexible for us.

Chose Alfresco
The integration is very easy and can be done with minimal time. The features like sending email, inbuilt integration with CAMEl, MULE, BOX, etc. In addition to this, the adoption of activiti-7 (the microservice version) wins the race against other tools. As the infrastructure …
Chose Alfresco
The biggest positive about Alfresco Content Services is its open-source nature. There are many possibilities of utilizing it in existing ecosystems using integrations.
Chose Alfresco
More robust workflow automation.
Chose Alfresco
All software has some pros and some cons. Alfresco has some good pluses, and suits our environment very well. It fit perfectly in the place that we are working on. That is why we decided to go with this software. Overall, the kind of content management that needs to be done in …
Chose Alfresco
- Alfresco provides more capabilities by leveraging open source components. The core architecture itself is JCR compliant which gives easy options for future migrations.
- The PDF rendition in Alfresco comes with LibreOffice at no additional cost.
- Alfresco support integrations …
Chose Alfresco
none
Chose Alfresco
As already explained earlier, the cost of licensing and support comes down very much by using Alfresco compared to Stellent and Sharepoint. Plus the overall performance and feature set is much broader for Alfresco. Since it is a newly developed content management system, it …
Chose Alfresco
Alfresco provides by default a very user-friendly user interface, And it's highly configurable. Moreover, the license model is really interesting compared to both solutions.
Chose Alfresco
Ultimately a cost decision - Alfresco community is free and has a decent community and various forums, books, etc available. The enterprise version is far less expensive than other options (although costs can add up depending on the the hardware it's running on). It is built …
Chose Alfresco
Java based open source wide community and popular ECM which is used by fortune 500 companies.
VectorViewer PDF Editor

No answer on this topic

Features
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
5.3
Ratings
37% below category average
Alfresco
-
Ratings
VectorViewer PDF Editor
-
Ratings
Dashboards6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports4.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
5.8
Ratings
36% below category average
Alfresco
-
Ratings
VectorViewer PDF Editor
-
Ratings
Process designer6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution5.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
4.0
Ratings
70% below category average
Alfresco
-
Ratings
VectorViewer PDF Editor
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools4.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
4.0
Ratings
68% below category average
Alfresco
-
Ratings
VectorViewer PDF Editor
-
Ratings
Content management4.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Aurea Process
-
Ratings
Alfresco
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
VectorViewer PDF Editor
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Tungsten Power PDF
Tungsten Power PDF
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
pdfFiller
pdfFiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aurea ProcessAlfrescoVectorViewer PDF Editor
Likelihood to Recommend
The tool has potential. Its capabilities and visual aspects could be considered rather basic but this might improve, particularly if the business intelligence/analytics aspect is leveraged. Once running well, it could allow (perhaps smaller) companies to successfully improve their customers' experiences through digitalizing customer journey - and we all know that customer loyalty goes a long way. However, whether or not the tool is comprehensive enough to deliver this for larger companies with more complex, multi- and omni-channel interactions is yet to be seen...
Read full review
If you have regulatory or business needs that require saving email into Alfresco and you are using Outlook for Mac, you may need to perform significant customization to make it work. Additionally, if you will have users that will be members to a large numbers of sites over time, you need to thoroughly explore what functionality will be degraded or lost and how to mitigate the impact. Other than these two scenarios, I cannot think of any scenarios where Alfresco would not be well suited to an organization's needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Face-lifted platforms: CX Messenger (formerly Sonic), CX Monitor (formerly Actional), CX Process (formerly Savvion)
  • User-friendly UI
  • Relatively painless implementation
Read full review
  • Integration with other applications, namely Drupal and Moodle, was simple and works beautifully.
  • The UI is intuitive, clean, and friendly. Users have required little training for basic functionality.
  • We have been pleased with the overall system performance of Alfresco Enterprise Content Management.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Standard edition is significantly lighter touch than the (pricier) Enterprise version
  • There are similar solutions on the market that are competitively prices and offer positive user experience
  • Data migration can be tricky at times
Read full review
  • Alfresco Process Services and Alfresco Application Development Framework integration makes for best functionality/application of ECM.
  • Use case alignment - Marketing content and documentation of specific business requirements and user stories being available as reference material/documentation.
  • Integration with multiple silos for content.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
As per the current market and the line of products that are available for content and document management system, Alfresco is a very good option compared to other systems in terms of features and cost. Plus the community support is great. Also since the product is open source, it can be extended or understood in a better way.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
The UI is very intuitive, most of our users figure out how to use the platform by themselves, so there's not much training needed.
You can upload files by using the web drag and drop, WebDAV, FTP, and more.
Most of the platform already works as-is so you can just deploy it using Docker and it's mostly ready to go.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I am not big fan of Alfresco Content Services' support; it works on its own speed and sometimes it becomes challenging to achieve business needs. However, I appreciate regular delivery of security patches and updates
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Process was relatively smooth and overall, downtime minimal. MSI was very responsive to our needs and made the transition easier than it otherwise might have been.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The integration is very easy and can be done with minimal time. The features like sending email, inbuilt integration with CAMEl, MULE, BOX, etc. In addition to this, the adoption of activiti-7 (the microservice version) wins the race against other tools. As the infrastructure and application modules can be deployed independently.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • As our customers vary in size and maturity, the ROI ranges accordingly.
  • For younger, smaller businesses this is a useful tool. Digitalization of he customer journey has certainly helped save time and efforts in many cases.
  • For more mature market players the tool is not always comprehensive enough. Dashboard and report personalization take time and efforts, and sometimes it feels that a dedicated BI tool would be a more suitable solution.
Read full review
  • It definitely has a positive ROI in the overall business, as content management has become easier and more centralized.
  • Video and image content management has become a major plus, as they play an important role in dynamic digital marketing. Once the code is written to accommodate image and videos, we can change this content any time depending on the season of the year, what products we are looking to market, and to what type of clients.
  • It helps with easy control of the system with the business teams rather than having control with the technology teams. Hence it makes it easy to customize and make changes at any time. This also reduces the overlap that technology has with business and helps treat both of them as separate entities.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Aurea Process Screenshots

Screenshot of CX Platform enables leading companies to modernize, automate, and monitor their back office by bridging legacy SOA solutions to modern micro-service and container-based architectures.

Alfresco Screenshots

Screenshot of Alfresco Control CenterScreenshot of Alfresco