Auryc vs. LogRocket

The session recording tool in Auryc is one of its most
useful features, as it allows you to filter by particular time frames and
traits to find people who participated in a design experiment and see how they
interact with new content.

It's worth noting that Auryc's funnel analysis makes it easy
and clear for stakeholders to see where conversion rates are falling.

We can also quickly design pop-up exit questionnaires and
collect your own data.

Incentivized

It's incredible for anyone who works at a saas and does customer support. It's the first job I've ever used Logrocket at and it adds such a great layer of service

Incentivized

• Heat mapping.
• User Flows.
• Video Recording.

Incentivized

• enhances the customer support journey
• allows non-techy personnel like myself to dive into customer issues

Incentivized

• Nothing that I dislike in specific.
• However, it would be nice to have better and exhaustive support guides/user manuals to help create custom reports and use the tool more effecively.
• The dashboard could be slightly better as too much data can be overwhelming at times.

Incentivized

• It's a shame recordings are capped to the previous month, but I believe this might be due to the plan we're on?
• Cropping sessions could be simplified I think - particularly the cropping tool's design

Incentivized

Auryc has a lot more features than Hotjar. The screen recordings have been great which Hotjar didn't have. Hotjar didn't track the site speed spikes or the NPS score.

Incentivized

• We have options for backtracking events if we don't configure tracking for a particular event.
• It's great for recording sessions and seeing how users interact with the website.
• Through funnel views, stakeholders can see churn and optimization goals.

Incentivized