Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. CMiC Construction Platform vs. iTWO benchmark

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
CMiC Construction Platform
Score 6.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.N/A
iTWO benchmark
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Construction benchmarking software is a web-based solution that has been designed to support organisations looking to enhance their pre-construction estimating capabilities; and gain important insights into how estimates compare to similar past projects. iTWO benchmark draws upon the clients’ data, creating a database of high-quality historical construction project information for detailed benchmark analyses and quick and accurate conceptual estimating. With all available data coordinated on a…N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Considered Multiple Products
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Storing and managing the project data in one location is not different that Autodesk Vault which is also a data management software. However, Autodesk Vault is slow in accessing and dealing with big Revit projects and files. Even if they are similar, we decided to use only …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
I have never used anything against BIM Collaborate, as it's our primary collaboration domain.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
This software streamlines BIM project workflows better than other software. It Saves time, reduces risk, and mitigates errors in construction projects. It will Help to improve quality & safety. The feature of clash detection is the best one and most useful. This software will …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
They are all very similar. It seems that Bim360 is easier to manage from the front end, which results in a better experience for all of the end users.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Integration with glue and field is the primary reason why Docs is better than PlanGrid. I would like for them to remove those silos however and have it under one platform. Unfortunately, it seems like Autodesk swallows up all the small companies so you are more likely to have …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Bim360 is an immature, oversold, and under-delivered product that is simply the only option available for collaboration when you are locked into the Autodesk Revit ecosystem. SharePoint Online, Dropbox Business, and other cloud file management and sharing solutions show you …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 serves us better for live collaboration than any other product. Because it is under the Autodesk umbrella it is compatible with Revit and AutoCAD MEP and Civil 3D. Unlike the other software where the data sharing is a static process. We went with BIM360 ultimately for …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
We chose Bim360 because it has a dashboard interface and friendly UI to organize data and documents.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Bim360 is a CDE in the overall BIM softwares from Autodesk. If you are using Revit, Navisworks or Building design suite from Autodesk, it's highly recommended that Bim360 be the CDE of choice to get your project into BIM technology.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 compared to prolog is comparing apples and oranges. We used these programs to do things the other could not. We used Prolog to handle bids, budget and change orders. While BIM360 we thought was not set up to easily do those options so we used BIM for drawings, …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
I think BIM360 has much better quality control tools that are much more streamlined than what is available on Procore. However the RFI, Submittal, Drawings tools in Procore are much easier to use and the drawings are much easier to access and view in the field using Procore. …
CMiC Construction Platform
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform and GCPAY works well together. Their integration provides an efficient working system for our company. Before these two platforms our workflow was a lot less efficient. It is all around better for us and our clients.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Prolog -over 20 years. CMiC Construction Platform is based on this platform.
E-Builder- CMiC Construction Platform does not have an Owner Platform
AutoDesk - Field Management. This was just starting so CMiC Construction Platform is well ahead.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is more powerful than Vista with more features...works well with GCPay. Procore did not have accounting which was a huge drawback and we had to ERP data back and forth which can be a pain especially when there were issues. The downside of being on …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
At the time we switched it was the only product that was feature rich and cloud based, our old product was heavily reliant on on premise servers.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
I believe Acumatica is a much more stable system with far better support, security, and reliability. Customization options are better in Acumatica as well. In my opinion, there is no competition. I believe CMiC Construction Platform will lose its client base to Acumatica in …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Currently, I use CMiC Construction Platform for all accounts payable, receivable, and overhead invoicing. Our project management operations use CMiC Construction Platform for processing all contracts, change orders, and billings via CMiC. Access to all the information in one …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform provides a better user interface and is easy on setting up.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Better looking platform. Easy to use as well. CMiC Construction Platform is what was selected by the general contractor for us to use for RFIs and submittals.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Similar programs however CMiC Construction Platform is slightly less complicated but tends to have more internal glitches.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Procore does Project Management better, however, we selected CMiC because of the single unified database for Project Management and Accounting.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC is a very powerful tool with the ability to integrate into other software platforms and transfer information between programs. With the click of a button, we can transfer data from CMiC to our MSR software and only have a few manual entry points to complete a monthly …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Project Management is a similar, but more advanced program than Vista. I prefer Vista because in my opinion it is more user-friendly and it is a desktop/cloud-based software, as opposed to CMiC which was a web browser. There is also better customer service with Vista and …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
I have not worked with [a] similar powerful platform with such [a] combination of tools. It has proved to our company by boosting our company growth within a short period of time. We have completed most of our projects and tasks on time effectively with the expected positive …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
Naturally, we have not used other platforms to their fullest. As such, we have limited comparison. Procore has a ratheR robust collaborative experience and document management. However, it lacks financial integration like CMiC. We choose CMiC as it seems like a complete …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC is more user friendly from a management perspective, robust in terms of the completeness of all processes - sales, management, and finance, collaborative with outside vendors and business partners, and provides better overall analytics of the data that drives our business, …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform is much more cost-effective than Procore and there is a reason for that.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
When we were first evaluating project management, file sharing, and collaboration applications we looked into and reviewed Oracle Primavera Contract Management, Oracle AutoVue 2D Professional, Oracle AutoVue 3D Professional Advanced, Oracle Primavera Unifier, Sage 300 …
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMiC Construction Platform can easily manage multiple construction projects through Cloud services. CMiC Construction [Platform] offers an excellent financial management capability that helps manage payrolls, financial transaction records and generate helpful reports.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
We have not used any other software. We were using Starbuilder before this.
Chose CMiC Construction Platform
CMIC is better suited for construction business
iTWO benchmark

No answer on this topic

Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
14% below category average
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
15% above category average
iTWO benchmark
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.2
Ratings
23% below category average
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
iTWO benchmark
-
Ratings
Dashboards4.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.10 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability7.10 Ratings8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.9
Ratings
7% below category average
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
8% above category average
iTWO benchmark
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing9.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing10.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.20 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation5.40 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports4.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing10.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools4.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings4.50 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app3.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.30 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists4.50 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications5.40 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
4.4
Ratings
53% below category average
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
iTWO benchmark
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools4.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing3.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator2.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation3.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
13% above category average
iTWO benchmark
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
CMiC Construction Platform
8.0
Ratings
16% above category average
iTWO benchmark
-
Ratings
Pay calculation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
4.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProCMiC Construction PlatformiTWO benchmark
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
Read full review
CMiC is a robust platform best suited for large companies with resources for implementation and management of the program. One analogy is CMiC is like a droid phone where the user must decide how to use all the features of the program (as opposed to an iPhone where most configuration decisions are made for the user). Smaller companies with limited resources can struggle with CMiC both with the expense and configuration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
  • The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
  • I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
  • I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
  • I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
  • Entering a code of the vendor instead of the company name while recording an invoice takes time and seems counter intuitive
  • Editing an invoice created through Image Management on the AP side is limited to description and address field. When changing the rest (invoice# or a date or an amount) - the whole trace of who entered/submitted/approved disappears. The way it works now is: deleting an invoice from the batch, locating it through Registry/invoice search, unsubmitting it, making changes, submitting, adding back to batch - time consuming
  • In Multiple distribution pop up window, when entering a new invoice, I'd make the field "Company" to be autofilled once "Job" is entered. It takes time to memorize what job number belongs to what company.
  • There is only web version available and it is limited compare to a desktop client. For instance I can only make one change at a time and save it. Multiple changes don't get saved in one click
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I can't even begin to imagine the thought of going through another software conversion so I do not think I would even consider switching at this point. It does everything we need it to do so I don't have any reason to recommend not renewing at this point in time
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
Read full review
I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
Reports are pretty shown to run but general pages typically load pretty quick.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
I felt the training was good and the trainers knew the software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.
Read full review
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
No answers on this topic
CMiC has several key features that can either work together or independently depending on your companies needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Well, I would say it's helpful for me to exchange different models with different specifications.
  • Number of people can work and also characterized models based on its modelling.
  • Even if a number of people are working, none of the models get disturbed, which is one of the most important points of BIM.
Read full review
  • We've knocked days, if not weeks, off of our timeline to getting invoices paid using Image manager and workflow approvals.
  • Because we have real time cost and budget information all in one place, we've knocked a day or two off of each project for their monthly forecasts, and we're much more consistent and accurate than we were before CMiC.
  • Because we pull a large chunk of project information into our BI reports, we've never had better visibility into projects and their potential issues. We're able to compare current project progress with past similar projects to determine if we are going to have an issue before it actually happens.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

CMiC Construction Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of CMiC FIELDScreenshot of CMiC AnalyticsScreenshot of CMiC Drawing ManagementScreenshot of CMiC FIELD