Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. Raken

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
Raken
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Raken provides mobile-first technology to streamline field workflows and build better projects for the construction industry.N/A
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Considered Both Products
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Storing and managing the project data in one location is not different that Autodesk Vault which is also a data management software. However, Autodesk Vault is slow in accessing and dealing with big Revit projects and files. Even if they are similar, we decided to use only …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
I have never used anything against BIM Collaborate, as it's our primary collaboration domain.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
This software streamlines BIM project workflows better than other software. It Saves time, reduces risk, and mitigates errors in construction projects. It will Help to improve quality & safety. The feature of clash detection is the best one and most useful. This software will …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
They are all very similar. It seems that Bim360 is easier to manage from the front end, which results in a better experience for all of the end users.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Integration with glue and field is the primary reason why Docs is better than PlanGrid. I would like for them to remove those silos however and have it under one platform. Unfortunately, it seems like Autodesk swallows up all the small companies so you are more likely to have …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Bim360 is an immature, oversold, and under-delivered product that is simply the only option available for collaboration when you are locked into the Autodesk Revit ecosystem. SharePoint Online, Dropbox Business, and other cloud file management and sharing solutions show you …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 serves us better for live collaboration than any other product. Because it is under the Autodesk umbrella it is compatible with Revit and AutoCAD MEP and Civil 3D. Unlike the other software where the data sharing is a static process. We went with BIM360 ultimately for …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
We chose Bim360 because it has a dashboard interface and friendly UI to organize data and documents.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Bim360 is a CDE in the overall BIM softwares from Autodesk. If you are using Revit, Navisworks or Building design suite from Autodesk, it's highly recommended that Bim360 be the CDE of choice to get your project into BIM technology.
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
BIM360 compared to prolog is comparing apples and oranges. We used these programs to do things the other could not. We used Prolog to handle bids, budget and change orders. While BIM360 we thought was not set up to easily do those options so we used BIM for drawings, …
Chose Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
I think BIM360 has much better quality control tools that are much more streamlined than what is available on Procore. However the RFI, Submittal, Drawings tools in Procore are much easier to use and the drawings are much easier to access and view in the field using Procore. …
Raken
Chose Raken
Raken services are available using a loud-based, free trial with effective training through documentation. The overall project management capabilities are excellent and effective for our users. Raken settings are also a simple process with a clean interface and functional …
Chose Raken
We use both software. Procore, we just recently switched over to. It is a compelling program, but just at a higher price point. Raken is a more affordable option, although they may not have exactly all the features that Procore has. But it does what it needs to pretty well.
Chose Raken
Vista is TTI's accounting software program. It is extremely well suited for the construction projects.

Team, which is similar to Raken, is more advance however the program is also more expensive.
Chose Raken
I'm used to seeing field operations employees use paper reporting for daily reports. I've seen some construction software companies incorporate daily reports but I haven't seen it yet where it is efficient and makes sense to use, most of the time it seems like an afterthought …
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.0
Ratings
14% below category average
Raken
8.2
Ratings
17% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets6.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.2
Ratings
23% below category average
Raken
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Dashboards4.40 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Custom reports7.10 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Data exportability7.10 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
6.9
Ratings
7% below category average
Raken
8.4
Ratings
12% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing9.90 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing10.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.20 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Photo documentation5.40 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Jobsite reports4.50 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Document sharing10.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
RFI tools4.40 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.80 Ratings8.20 Ratings
As-built drawings4.50 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Mobile app3.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.30 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Checklists4.50 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Specifications5.40 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Change orders8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
4.4
Ratings
53% below category average
Raken
8.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Takeoff tools4.50 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Job costing3.60 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Cost databases8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Cost calculator2.60 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Bid creation3.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
Raken
8.1
Ratings
14% above category average
Employee demographic data00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Employment history00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Job profiles and administration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Organizational charting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Organization and location management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
Raken
8.2
Ratings
18% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 1.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProRaken
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very efficient to set up projects using configurable templates for files, issues, and roles. Data management is easy to be understood by many users. As we have multiple users that are located in different areas in the world, it allows managing multi-discipline teams in only one environment. Clash analysis on shared models saves us time too.
Read full review
Raken is a great way to keep track of the day to day work being done on the job site. It's especially good at keeping all members of the project on the same page and all updated with the most current information on the job. Photos help assist office personnel and Project Managers of the progress on the job site.
Read full review
Pros
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
  • Great iPhone application - The application makes reporting and adding photos very easy.
  • It's easy to navigate different days and reports. Or to find keywords or subcontractors and when they performed work.
Read full review
Cons
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
  • The time card can't be downloaded.
  • Would like time card template. Unaware if there is a time card template within the system.
Read full review
Usability
It's not very difficult to use for majority of all our users. We really like storing and managing all our project data in one location so users have only one option to access the requested information. Managing our architectural engineering projects with two workflows in one system is really a good asset
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
Raken has an excellent support team. Raken are pretty prompt with getting back to you. Raken also has a convenient chat feature on their website. All their support members are friendly and are good at helping you understand and resolve your issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Personally I prefer Procore for reviewing submittals and other documentation for LEED purposes only because that platform holds more of the information we are looking for like drawings as well, all in one place. Newforma has been used from time to time, but Autodesk is preffered to that because of its straightforward nature. Overall, we use the platform that our projects are already using, but they do make a small difference in the time and effectiveness of which we are able to do our job as consultants.
Read full review
Raken services are available using a loud-based, free trial with effective training through documentation. The overall project management capabilities are excellent and effective for our users. Raken settings are also a simple process with a clean interface and functional features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Well, I would say it's helpful for me to exchange different models with different specifications.
  • Number of people can work and also characterized models based on its modelling.
  • Even if a number of people are working, none of the models get disturbed, which is one of the most important points of BIM.
Read full review
  • Less need to travel to each job site.
  • Automated emailed reports to clients reduces the number of meetings/conversations about what is happening on the project.
Read full review
ScreenShots