TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Backup

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AAWS Backup is a fully managed backup service from AWS, designed to make it easy to centralize and automate the back up of data across AWS services in the cloud as well as on premises using the AWS Storage Gateway. Using AWS Backup, users can centrally configure backup policies and monitor backup activity for AWS resources, such as Amazon EBS volumes, Amazon RDS databases, Amazon DynamoDB tables, Amazon EFS file systems, and AWS Storage Gateway volumes.

    $0.01

    per GB per month

    Carbonite by OpenText

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/ACarbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Editions & Modules
    Backup Storage - Cold Storage
    $0.01
    per GB per month
    Restore - Warm Storage
    $0.02
    per GB per month
    Restore - Cold Storage
    $0.03
    per GB per month
    Backup Storage - Warm Storage
    $0.095
    per GB per month
    Restore - Item-Level Restore
    $0.50
    per request
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Considered Both Products
    Amazon AWS
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    9 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    9 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    9 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    Features
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of AWS Backup and Carbonite by OpenText
    Feature
    AWS Backup
    8.9
    6 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Carbonite by OpenText
    8.8
    24 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Management dashboard8.26 Ratings8.812 Ratings
    Retention options6.76 Ratings6.014 Ratings
    Encryption8.36 Ratings9.914 Ratings
    Universal recovery00 Ratings10.09 Ratings
    Instant recovery00 Ratings3.311 Ratings
    Recovery verification00 Ratings9.89 Ratings
    Business application protection00 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings10.016 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification00 Ratings9.821 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud00 Ratings9.423 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings9.013 Ratings
    Snapshots00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
    Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.812 Ratings
    Platform support00 Ratings8.813 Ratings
    Enterprise Backup
    Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of AWS Backup and Carbonite by OpenText
    Feature
    AWS Backup
    7.6
    3 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Carbonite by OpenText
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Operational reporting and analytics7.73 Ratings6.93 Ratings
    Malware protection7.73 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Ransomware Recovery7.53 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Continuous data protection00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
    Replication00 Ratings8.32 Ratings
    Multi-location capabilities00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
    SaaS Backup
    Comparison of SaaS Backup features of AWS Backup and Carbonite by OpenText
    Feature
    AWS Backup
    7.6
    3 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Carbonite by OpenText
    -
    Ratings
    SaaS Product Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Data Restoration Options7.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Auditing and Search7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Storage in the Cloud or On-Premises7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Small Businesses
    Backupify
    Score5.6 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Spanning Backup
    Score7.4 out of 10
    MSP360 Backup
    Score7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Veeam Data Cloud for Azure
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (12 ratings)
    8.9
    (49 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (5 ratings)
    8.8
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.4
    (4 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS BackupCarbonite by OpenText
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    There is a cost involved with data retrieval. AWS Backup is truly that, a backup. If you need to access this data on a regular basis, there are better options out there. For long term, just in case incremental backups, AWS [Backup] checks all the boxes. Just set it up, start your backups, and rest assured your data is safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    More than enough for small companies with several on-prem servers. In 2021, it wouldn't be wise to pit all important data to a single backup service. Carbonite Server is solid, but it's not 100% reliable so I'd definitely recommend having multiple backup services either on the cloud in conjunction with other backup services so the user has multiple safety nets in case of disaster and failed granular restorations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Centralized management - single pane of glass to manage backups for multiple AWS services.
    • Encryption - integrates with KMS to encrypt backup data at rest and in transit.
    • Cross Account management - manage backups across multiple AWS accounts with AWS organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Simple administrative web interface - It's easy to provision users, look at data usage stats, disable users, and update policies to control what folders users are allowed to backup, and what options they can access
    • Easy client installation - Installing and updating clients was very simple. The client would notify the user when a new update was approved by the site admins, and they typically went very smoothly.
    • Good performance - Backups went fairly fast, and were generally invisible to the user, other than the icon updating on files to indicate whether the current version of a file was backed up or not.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Restoring the compute nodes of the cluster should be done always
    • Having the default Roles all the necessary permission, you have to add some depending on your configurations
    • Being able to see the Jobs status in a centralize account more graphically
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • While overall file restoration is easy to do, obtaining earlier versions is not as user friendly as it could be. You need to enter a date and click search to bring up the latest versions as of the date entered. That’s fine, but what is missing is the ability to see all versions of an individual file. If I am looking for a past file version I want to be able to view the file history as a subset of that file (in other words I should be able to click a + sign and expand to see past versions of the file). Otherwise I am just guessing which dates the file was changed in the past. Sometimes that’s OK, but Mozy needs to build in this enhanced, but necessary feature.
    • A couple of years ago, for non enterprise users, Mozy made radical storage and pricing changes forcing myself and many users off their system, as the price for the same storage was going up significantly. So be careful when using Mozy as past experience has shown they are willing to make major changes regardless of the negative impact on their users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Overall because I can sell it white labeled and use my white labeled software like CloudBerry and the native backup apps on my synology NAS servers to store things in real time and do duplication and disaster recovery directly to it was game changing for my client in the advertising world they are never down now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Out of all the vendor we deal with they are one of the best when it comes to customers service. Reliable,you can reach them by telephone easily, Great overall can not say anything to the contrary. Usibility is excellent. I recommend them highly whether you need a simple backup ofr more complex for servers etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    Support for AWS Backup is by Amazon itself so it is solid as always. If you have a business or higher level support plan you'll have no trouble getting engineers or other staff on the job to help you with whatever comes up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    I usually find what I need to know by looking in the Carbonite knowledge base online. We haven't had any major problems, usually we just need clarification on a point or more details about a feature so we look it up. We haven't had to call in for help in quite awhile.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    OpenText
    We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    I've tried a lot of different products. Backblaze, at least from a birds-eye view is significantly cheaper than AWS/the rest. Backblaze is a little more simpler, but it's well worth it. Linode also provides backup options, however I'm only familiar with their backup on their VPS's (however you make that plural), which never gave me a problem.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required us to setup a tunnel or use the internet to move data back to our main office.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Offsite means a failure at our cloud provider means we can redeploy quickly to another data center or another provider quickly.
    • The cost can't be best.
    • Pay only for what you use. No need to pay for extra data that you don't need.
    • No minimums
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • We have a safety net that we didn't have before.
    • Key players are now backed up through an automated system that was easy to silently install.
    • The resources used impacted our exchange server negatively and slowed email until it was disabled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots