AWS Cloud9 vs PyCharm

• It provides an extremely intuitive and easy-to-use interface, so adapting to it does not take much time.
• It contains the most common programming languages.
• It allows the export of files, either directly to the repository or to the team where you want it.
• It is housed in the cloud so you can work with it from anywhere.
• Allows you to share code or work on them with others in real-time.
• Does not require installation.

Read full review

• Customizable interface: layout, color scheme, hot keys, etc may all be individually tailored to a user.
• Platform intelligence: debugging, code analysis, dependency resolution, and auto completion make the PyCharm IDE efficient and a pleasure to use
• Support / tutorials guide the user through learning the different capabilities (this was a big deal for me when I switched to using Python / PyCharm after coding in a text editor and R Studio)

Read full review

• Confusing documentation - AWS's documentation remains quite confusing, and the layout of other services/settings that you have to use with Cloud9 can be a bit of a handful.
• Sometimes slow - As the size of a project increases, the editor gets increasingly slower, and starts slowing down the browser overall.
• Long setup process - The setup for Cloud9 can be hard and tough, especially since the documentation is quite hard to understand.

Read full review

• Some time add ons don't work as expected.
• It takes up lot of memory when 2 or more projects are open at the same time.
• Setting up proxies is not straight forward.
• Most of the features in paid version are now available in VS code for free.

Read full review

• It is a tool that has allowed us to optimize the life cycle of the projects since it is excellent for this because you can share code from one department to another quickly.
• It allows to always be able to access the code from any device, at any time.
• Save time in the installation of an IDE, plugins, compilers, etc.
• It is ideal to use with other AWS tools since they have a great synergy, like CodeBuild, CodeCommit, CodeStar, etc.

Read full review

• Buying the licensed pro version is a bit costly, but overall because of its features and its speed, the time taken by a developer to develop something can be improved. Indirectly getting a good return of Investment.
• Considering the team size and its features, one can go for the licensed version as the ROI is high.
• Customer support is also good for a licensed version, thereby saving the time, which in turn shows ROI as high.

Read full review