TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS CodePipeline

    Score6.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps users automate release pipelines. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of the release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model a user defines.

    $1

    per active pipeline/per month

    BMC Helix ITSM

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ABMC Helix ITSM replaces Remedy. It is a broad suite of ITSM, tools with strong integrations to other BMC tools and in-built ITAM. The product is used mainly by global brands and is offered in on-premise and SaaS configurations.N/A

    CircleCI

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ACircleCI is a software delivery engine from the company of the same name in San Francisco, that helps teams ship software faster, offering their platform for Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD). Ultimately, the solution helps to map every source of change for software teams, so they can accelerate innovation and growth.

    $0

    for up to 6,000 build minutes and up to 5 active users per month

    Pricing
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Editions & Modules
    AWS CodePipeline
    $1
    per active pipeline/per month
    Free Tier
    Free
    BMC Helix ITSM
    Contact Sales
    Server
    Contact Sales
    Performance
    starting at $15
    per month
    Scale
    starting at $2000
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Considered Multiple Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS CodePipeline
    AWS Codepipeline is proprietary to Amazon Web Services and works well when you're working with other AWS products. If you're using a different technology stack, then Codepipeline may not be the best tool and some open source/closed source tools available on the web may suffice.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS CodePipeline
    They all pretty much have the same feature set. AWS CodePipeline has been improving in recent years, and it just makes sense to keep everything within Amazon's ecosystem.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS CodePipeline
    I felt that, out of the alternatives, AWS CodePipeline was the simplest to setup and most reliable. Since my client's infrastructure was already hosted in AWS, I felt it was a no-brainer. If a client needed a similar solution with on-prem or non-AWS infrastructure, I would …
    Incentivized
    BMC Helix
    No answer on this topic
    CircleCI
    Chose CircleCI
    CircleCI is still being developed and worked on continually while TravisCI is not.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Would buy again
    80 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    76 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    83 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    54 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    60 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    Features
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Incident and problem management
    Comparison of Incident and problem management features of AWS CodePipeline and BMC Helix ITSM and CircleCI
    Feature
    AWS CodePipeline
    -
    Ratings
    BMC Helix ITSM
    8.5
    114 Ratings
    4% above category average
    CircleCI
    -
    Ratings
    Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings9.1112 Ratings00 Ratings
    Expert directory00 Ratings8.881 Ratings00 Ratings
    Service restoration00 Ratings8.693 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-service tools00 Ratings8.3102 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings7.682 Ratings00 Ratings
    ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings8.599 Ratings00 Ratings
    ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings8.7102 Ratings00 Ratings
    ITSM asset management
    Comparison of ITSM asset management features of AWS CodePipeline and BMC Helix ITSM and CircleCI
    Feature
    AWS CodePipeline
    -
    Ratings
    BMC Helix ITSM
    8.1
    101 Ratings
    0% below category average
    CircleCI
    -
    Ratings
    Configuration mangement00 Ratings8.297 Ratings00 Ratings
    Asset management dashboard00 Ratings8.293 Ratings00 Ratings
    Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings8.074 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change management
    Comparison of Change management features of AWS CodePipeline and BMC Helix ITSM and CircleCI
    Feature
    AWS CodePipeline
    -
    Ratings
    BMC Helix ITSM
    8.8
    103 Ratings
    4% above category average
    CircleCI
    -
    Ratings
    Change requests repository00 Ratings8.9103 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change calendar00 Ratings8.697 Ratings00 Ratings
    Service-level management00 Ratings9.098 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Small Businesses
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
    Score9.2 out of 10
    AWS CodePipeline
    Score6.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    CircleCI
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Ivanti ITSM
    Score6.3 out of 10
    AWS CodePipeline
    Score6.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    8.8
    (121 ratings)
    9.0
    (27 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (72 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    6.8
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    3.0
    (10 ratings)
    6.9
    (6 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS CodePipelineBMC Helix ITSMCircleCI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    I think AWS CodePipeline is a great tool for anyone wanted automated deployments in a multi-server/container AWS environment. AWS also offers services like Elastic Beanstalk that provide a more managed hosting & deployment experience. CodePipeline is a good middle ground with solid, built-in automation with enough customizability to not lock people into one deployment or architecture philosophy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    BMC Helix ITSM fits our environment particularly well, where standardized, auditable processes are already in place: Incident and Problem Management can be structured cleanly, with clear ownership, escalations, and fully traceable documentation—crucial in a highly regulated banking context. Through the customer platform/portal, users can log incidents and requests consistently, track their status transparently, and use a single central communication channel across service boundaries. This supports a service-oriented setup spanning multiple business services and locations. It becomes less suitable—or at least more effort-intensive—when core foundation data is not yet stable: an immature CMDB, insufficient ITAM data quality, and an unstructured knowledge base limit the value of automation and self-service. In addition, heterogeneous integrations and strict authorization models can increase implementation and ongoing maintenance efforts, especially when SLAs are not harmonized across different customer environments.
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    Based on our experience, CircleCI is well-suited for automating mobile app release cycles. For example, to release an iOS app, you would need to build, sign, and upload it to TestFlight, which requires a dedicated Mac in the office. But with CircleCI, you can have macOS executors, so you don't have to manage a physical build machine. Another benefit is that CircleCI's certified AWS Orbs abstract away complex authentication and deployment logic, allowing us to build, push, and deploy Docker containers to Amazon ECS with minimal configuration and high reliability. CircleCI is less suited for smaller projects where the development and deployment are not that extensive, for example, a static site. Once you have built a static site, you probably won't make any further changes, so there's no point in paying for it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • It is reliable and works without errors
    • It integrates well with our repository and all other AWS functions as well as our end database
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • AI drive incident correlation leading to identifying problems and major incidents quickly.
    • Digital Workplace gives end-users a modern and personalized UI to submit requests, monitor service health, and receive self-help.
    • As an enterprise ITSM, it is critical that Request, Incident, Problem, Asset, and Change Management are integrated and flow together. BMC Helix is built on this principle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    • Automated builds! This is really why you get CircleCI, to automate the build process. This makes building your application far more reliable and repeatable. It can also run tests and verify your application is working as expected.
    • Simple. Unlike Jenkins, Teamcity, or other platforms, CircleCI doesn't need a lot of setup. It's completely hosted, so there's no infrastructure to set up. The config file does take a bit to understand, but if you follow their example and start with something small and add to it, you can get it up and going quicker than it first looks.
    • Scales easily. Again, since it's all cloud-based, you don't have to manage or scale infrastructure. Simply subscribe to the number of containers you want, and scaling up just means buying more containers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • Ease of use - things like CircleCI or other tools are a bit easier to learn.
    • Ability to build from more sources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • Service Level management configs can be lengthy, and when changes are needed to specific SLA, it does take a long time to configure. Templates work but only for certain things, lots of manual work is still required.
    • The Online product documentation can be confusing or in same cases not correct.
    • BMC products are sometimes expensive. When partners try to resell licenses or increase their own allotment, it becomes very expensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    • While configuration is easy, the config files can get very very long.
    • Price compared to some alternatives that are cheaper / free. Especially so if you are running multiple containers in parallel.
    • Have experienced numerous outages (3-5) in the last few months where CircleCI has been down.
    • Web documentation and tutorials haven't been as good as some of the competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    It provides the tool we need and is able to be customised to meet new requirements. Cost to change in training and integrations would be considerable.
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    Overall, I give AWS Codepipeline a 9 because it gets the job done and I can't complain much about the web interface as much of the action is taking place behind the scenes on the terminal locally or via Amazon's infrastructure anyway. It would be nicer to have a better flowing and visualizable web interface, however.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    Overall the product enhances the capability of incident management, problem management and change management. The AI based framework helps generated better visibility and reports. The effectiveness of enhanced service desk suuport improves end user experience as the incidents are handled well in time and aged incidents are highlighted at the right time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    The reliability & speed, it just works. The ability to spin up macOS runners and Docker containers on demand without managing hardware is a huge win. The Orbs system makes integrating with AWS and Slack incredibly easy, saving us weeks of custom scripting and providing real-time updates in our Slack channel. This makes it easy for us to track and ensures that everyone involved knows the status. Of course, it has drawbacks related to configuration complexity and, in some cases, cost transparency, but overall, it is an industry-standard, robust tool that solves our core infrastructure problems well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    for now we are satisfied. first two months 😉
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Amazon AWS
    Our pipeline takes about 30 minutes to run through. Although this time depends on the applications you are using on either end, I feel that it is a reasonable time to make upgrades and updates to our system as it is not an every day push.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    could be faster. db is slower from introducing postgresql
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    It's pretty snappy, even with using workflows with multiple steps and different docker images. I've seen builds take a long time if it's really involved, but from what I can tell, it's still at least on par if not faster than other build tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    We didn't need a lot of support with AWS CodePipeline as it was pretty straightforward to configure and use, but where we ran into problems, the AWS community was able to help. AWS support agents were also helpful in resolving some of the minor issues we encountered, which we could not find a solution elsewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    Their tech support is top notch. They respond and get back to us, even on lower level incidents and issues, very quickly. It is rare that we deal with a support technician who does not know what they are doing.
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    Unless you have a reasonably large account, you're going to be mainly stuck reading their documentation. Which has improved somewhat over the years but is still extremely limited compared to a platform like Digital Ocean who invested in the documentation and a community to ensure it's kept up to date. If you can't find your answer there, you can be stuck.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    the trainers dont have so much practical experiences. its mostly follow up and reading existing documentation withou own input. of course experiences people are on shore or have no free time. sad truth
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    Satisfied because I didn't have to do it!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    CodeCommit and CodeDeploy can be used with CodePipeline so it’s not really fair to stack them against each other as they can be quite the compliment. The same goes for Beanstalk, which is often used as a deployment target in relation to CodePipeline.

    CodePipeline fulfills the CI/CD duty, where the other services do not focus on that specific function. They are supplements, not replacements. CodePipeline will detect the updated code and handle deploying it to the actual instance via Beanstalk.

    Jenkins is open source and not a native AWS service, that is its primary differentiator. Jenkins can also be used as a supplement to CodePipeline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    I believe Remedy's performance and market share exceeds its competitors. But it is worth mentioning that Microsoft's SCCM has excellent integration with Microsoft enterprise solutions and has is less expensive and not efficient. The IBM solution has better analytics but lacks the wide features and capabilities of Remedy. HP & CA are the real competitors for Remedy but lacks the stability, maturity, and effectiveness in Remedy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    Jenkins is usually self-hosted, Travis CI's infrastructure is largely unreliable (lots of tests time out for no discernable reason), and Semaphore encourages you to configure your CI/CD from a web UI. We like CircleCI because its hosted, our tests run largely as expected on their infrastructure, and we can configure it from a config file that we track in GitHub.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    unclear. lot of for less
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    BMC Helix
    Again, always room for improvement, but a very stable product none-the-less.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • CodePipeline has reduced ongoing devops costs for my clients, especially around deployment & testing.
    • CodePipeline has sped up development workflow by making the deployment process automated off git pushes. Deployment takes very little coordination as the system will just trigger based on what is the latest commit in a branch.
    • CodePipeline offered a lot of out-of-the-box functionality that was much simpler to setup than a dedicated CI server. It allowed the deployment process to built and put into production with much less and effort and cost compared to rolling the functionality manually.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    BMC Helix
    • Positive: an introduction to ITIL and viewing Asset, User Management from the perspective of ITIL, and how BMC has implemented those processes
    • Negative: The development team needs to communicate better with the sales and support side, and they need offer an open API
    • Negative: Currently the Asset Management side has little security and validation of Asset input: anyone can make API (mostly), at any item, which is a problem that I am apart of solving.
    • The UX needs updating, badly. Its quality is poor: it functions, but it is cumbersome, click-heavy and requires several hours to understand how to function with it. Also, it needs to ditch IE11 support, altogether.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CircleCI
    • We pay over $5K/ month and we have high expectations for service. Sometimes I feel that we don't get the value, but only sometimes.
    • We have had to build our own application to keep state and broker releases and deployments. We call our app deployer. I feel that CircleCI could do more to understand our needs and possibly build additional features that would enable us to invest less in build and deployment infrastructure and justify paying more for Circle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    BMC Helix ITSM Screenshots

    Screenshot of BMC Helix Multi-Cloud Broker. This is where users can deliver a secure service experience across multi-cloud environments.Screenshot of Knowledge Management, available with intelligent recommendations to help bring the right information to end-users and agents to quickly and accurately resolve issues.Screenshot of the incident and problem management interface, used to create and resolve incidents faster with intelligent, context-aware, and proactive incident matching.