Azure CDN vs. Cloudflare vs. F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure CDN
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers a content delivery network, Azure CDN.N/A
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare’s connectivity cloud is a unified platform of cloud-native services designed to help enterprises regain control over their IT environments. Powered by an intelligent, programmable global cloud network, it is built to offer security, performance, visibility, and reliability.
$20
per month
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF leverages F5's Advanced WAF technology, delivering WAF-as-a-Service and combining signature- and behavior-based protection for web applications. It acts as an intermediate proxy to inspect application requests and responses to block and mitigate a broad spectrum of risks stemming from the OW ASP Top 10, persistent and coordinated threat campaigns, bots, and layer 7 DoS.N/A
Pricing
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pro
$20
per month
Business
$200
per month
Free
Free
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Considered Multiple Products
Azure CDN
Chose Azure CDN
Well, Azure CDN is a reliable and user-friendly content delivery network. Additionally, it performs multiple tasks that helps us in website management.
Cloudflare
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is easier to use and more user friendly. It is really a great tool for average users. It's convenient and fast to use. I really like it better than other tools out there. It is superior in many ways. Really one of the best CDNs out there by far.
Chose Cloudflare
In my opinion it is the best one to manage and has a lot of resources written for you to be able to grasp any concept that you might need help in. It is a tool that you can handle alone if you have the basic knowledge.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare proved to be the winning choice over its competitors because it was the only solution that's so complete. The other solutions we analyzed were convincing for the caching/CDN aspect but had gaps in other aspects such as security or DDoS protection. Cloudflare also …
Chose Cloudflare
1. It's very cost effective if compared with other cloud CDN.
2.It's Easier to manage multiple domains from a single CloudFlare account.
3.SSL is very cheap.
Chose Cloudflare
CloudFlare shines in a situation where you need a low-cost solution that can be un-integrated with other aspects of your deployment. For websites that have larger DDoS risk, their DDoS solutions are also attractive. Up-market, their enterprise offerings are on par with services …
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) stacks up pretty well against the competition as far as feature set is concerned and offers various tiers that make it available for limited budget projects also while offering GDPR compliance with minimum effort. Cloudflare
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Basically, Cloudflare is a more economical solution at the level of DNS balancing, easy to use with a few simple clicks and that has gained an advantage in the market, however, compared to F5, it falls short of the entire protection panorama that the solution provides since F5 …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
When comparing F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, Akamai, Cloudflare, and Fastly, Fastly generally stands out for its raw speed and focus on developer-friendly features, while Cloudflare is often considered the best balance of speed, security, and ease of use, making it a popular choice …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
We considered Cloudflare in the first place because it came with strong appeal upfront, it's easy to deploy especially for small web apps. We even ran a few pilot tests with it during client rollouts but settled on F5 Distributed Cloud WAF instead. Main reason being its …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF allowed us to protect internal applications without public exposure, edge routing, or cloud dependency. We gained robust protection without exposing internal systems to the internet and F5 gave us the flexibility, security, and control we needed for a …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Our organization chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) because, in our opinion, F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) has Better WAF protection
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Better support for onprem workloads
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Easier to configure
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
It that local Distributor taking care the service and support such as deliver Training, sharing knowledge and introduce the new technology.
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
The comprehensive security feature that offers wide range of security features in a single platform like threat detection, bot prevention, granular security policies etc. it also has an extensive automation framework that seemlessly integrates with other components that are …
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
We chose F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) due to competitive pricing, value for money features as well as good after-sales support.
Features
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
DDoS Protection
Comparison of DDoS Protection features of Product A and Product B
Azure CDN
-
Ratings
Cloudflare
10.0
1 Ratings
0% above category average
F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
-
Ratings
Automatic Scalability00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mitigation SLA00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Security policy management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
WAF capabilities00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Request rate limiting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic filtering00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Bot detection00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Global threat intelligence00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Real-time analytics and reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
IBM Cloud Internet Services
IBM Cloud Internet Services
Score 9.0 out of 10
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Score 7.8 out of 10
Akamai App & API Protector
Akamai App & API Protector
Score 8.5 out of 10
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(8 ratings)
9.1
(184 ratings)
9.1
(123 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
7.4
(9 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(8 ratings)
9.2
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.7
(149 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure CDNCloudflareF5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure CDN has at hand an infinity of applications and tools to implement in your system and have better control of your data in a clean and secure platform on the web, we recommend this program since the percentage of solutions provided by this program is very high and find a way to make each user's job easier.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Cloudflare works well as security measure that gives peace of mind without needing to work too hard to get it functioning well. It provides great tools to customize the security experience as well. This is all the same for the caching tools as well. They have a lot of built in tools that make using the caching easy right out of the box, but they provide the customization options to get things just right for your site.
Read full review
F5
It is doing its job effectively, and its scalability is superb. So, if you have a mixed environment with cloud and on-premise systems to protect this product, provide a solution to the challenge. However, its management is more suited to DevOps teams rather than to the ones responsible for on-premise systems, making the management a bit more complex.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • I found the CDN very easy to setup and configure within the Azure Portal.
  • Being Azure, there are plenty of free tools that allow you to manage the CDN from a UI that is not the portal. This was especially handy when I trained end users how to manage content within their specific realm.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • The best part is the content delivery network. Cloudflare has a large network of data centres around the world that helps cache and delivers content quickly to our customers.
  • Cloudflare offers us with a fast and reliable DNS service and with the world class features such as Cloudflare workers, SSL verification, certificate management and web application firewall. When all of these are combined together, it provides very strict security for our organization.
  • One of the most important feature that we use is the analytics and threat detection. It provides us with the real time insights of all the threats originating from multiple locations and landing on our websites.
Read full review
F5
  • Layer seven attacks are becoming far more common. Traditionally it was always layered three, layer four, where you get an additional firewall, but with the application layer attacks become more frequent, more popular, et cetera. So having the web application firewall protecting us, and then with the recent Log4j, that's the most recent use case when it gave us that instant level of protection whilst we remediated the Log4j that we had that and the F5 Distributed Cloud WAF was protecting us.
  • I have a great relationship with the account manager, my account manager, and I think he drives the best price possible, um, for me, and I'm happy with that price.
  • F5 Distributed Cloud WAF is always innovating and evolving.
  • We run a very competitive proof value where we run numerous competitors against each other, and then we evaluate from that and then make the selection, and F5 Distributed Cloud WAF was the winner.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Tough learning curve--you have to be comfortable with the Azure Cloud logic and UI to use it easily
  • Special or uncommon use cases' pricing can be hard to forecast/follow
  • Can be expensive for simple use cases
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • In some cases, using Cloudflare can actually lead to slower website speeds if the network is congested or if the website's traffic is particularly heavy.
  • Some website owners may find that the level of customization offered by Cloudflare is limited, especially in comparison to other solutions.
  • While Cloudflare is easy to set up and manage, it may be too complex for users who are not familiar with web technologies.
Read full review
F5
  • Lack of warnings, currently the console does not provide a warning when deleting key-value entry.
  • The web GUI could use some tweaking, currently no undo option when removing exclusion rules.
  • Configuration complexity, currently menus and options are hidden, making it hard to configure vs on prem.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
lower cost
Read full review
F5
We gave it an 8 because it protects our web apps well and is reliable. The WAF is flexible and meets most of our needs. It could improve in user interface and make integrations easier, but overall, it’s a solid and effective security tool for us.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
I give it 9/10 rating because it solved my problem by Caching my website content on global servers to load faster.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Everything is extremely concise and all settings apply immediately and take effect globally. There is no reason to explicitly plan/think in terms of individual regions as one would have to traditional cloud offerings (AWS, OCI, Azure). All Cloudflare products integrate seamless as part of a single pipeline that executes from request to response.
Read full review
F5
I believe is a solution that was designed from the start to be simple and easy to use. Coming from Imperva, it simply eased the burden and complexity of managing and securing our apps on different environments (cloud and on-prem). It easy to scale and very quick to deploy (as a cloud waf should be), provide us with DevOps integrations, visibility and automatic insights from multiple events that guarantee peace of mind for us analysts and opp managers.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
In 6+ years of relying on Cloudflare, I think we experienced one or two brief outages that were Cloudflare's fault.
Read full review
F5
Seems no issue
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
Their Argo for the global network is the core feature we love.
Read full review
F5
Unnoticed slowness
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
Great support from the team whenever we're stuck. Very proactive in resolving issues and also making changes as per the requirements of the organization.
Read full review
Cloudflare
Excellent product, Cloudflare is a true pioneer of the modern Internet, providing tools, services, and expertise that vastly improve the performance and security of web services. Any issues are resolved quickly with detailed RCA and follow-ups published publicly. I'm thankful to Cloudflare and use their services both at work and at home.
Read full review
F5
I never contacted support for this product.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
No answers on this topic
F5
Online training saves me lots of time
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
Very well executed implementation where our team was able to handle the implementation with guidance.
Read full review
F5
Just make sure you origin servers have F5 IPs allowed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
More user friendly and it’s so easy to learn, the prices may be close to each other, but the service is excellent.
Read full review
Cloudflare
They have the most generous free offering, and after the free offering limit is reached - you're still getting plenty of value for the buck.
They have very good reputation.
They have an ever expanding list of tools that can support multiple scenarios under one roof.
Read full review
F5
The other one that I've used in the past, they're very similar and I haven't used it recently, so I can't do a side-by-side comparison today. But I can say that F5 does everything we want it to do consistent with what this other product did do and it's got enhanced features and of course we have a long history with F5 as a product set in general.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cloudflare
They are built for scale and have the capacity to handle all the traffic we could ever expect to get.
Read full review
F5
Dont see any issue so far
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Azure CDN reduced origin instance load by removing the need to constantly serve large numbers of static files, meaning applications can be deployed with smaller/fewer instances.
  • Azure CDN reduces apparent load times to customers by serving cached files out of POPs in the local region of those clients, instead of requiring those clients to make multiple, lengthy requests through to the origin servers.
Read full review
Cloudflare
  • Immediate ROI on Registrar and DNS hosting while giving a single plane of glass to managing both with domain registrations at cost, and no cost DNS hosting
  • WAF helped us move at risk servers/applications into a protected state allowing us to perform remediations at a measured pace and get them done right instead of band aide solutions.
  • CDN proxying increase the speed of our website while simultaneously reducing server load.
  • DMARC management and report interpretation allow use to identify weak points in our email systems, remediate and move to stricter policies without significantly increasing staff time spent managing it.
Read full review
F5
  • The biggest gain for us was speed. Before F5 Distributed Cloud WAF, onboarding a new app to our WAF stack meant manual rule tuning, traffic sampling and regression testing. Right now, we spin up a service, tag it with the right policy and its ready (production ready) within hours
Read full review
ScreenShots

F5 Distributed Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall) Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of