Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB

• Injects unstructured data at a very high speed.
• No real need for administrative work, it indexes everything on it's own.

Read full review

• Easy to learn. When I picked up MongoDB for the first time, I had little background in database management or modeling. If you have a background in javascript (and JSON)... then you can figure out how to use MongoDB pretty fast.
• Fast performance.
• It's relatively easy to set up in certain environments because there are lots of ready-made solutions out there.
• There's a lot of support in the existing ecosystem for it —, especially in the node.js realm.
• Query syntax is pretty simple to grasp and utilize.
• Aggregate functions are powerful.
• Scaling options.
• Documentation is quite good and versioned for each release.

Read full review

• Cosmos DB can be very expensive if you're using it for scenarios that are better completed in regular old Azure Table Storage or Blob Storage, specifically if you put some thought into your partitioning schemes. No product is a good substitute for thoughtful system design.
• It would be helpful if I had some more insight into how many resources (DTUs) an individual query uses.
• The auto-indexing is great, but a little mysterious -- not usually an issue but it does require some intentional thought.

Read full review

• I love the idea of Map-Reduce native support in MongoDB. Admittedly I have not used it as much as I would like -- it always seems to trip me up.
• Recent additions to the aggregation queries have helped reduce (no pun intended) my need to better wield the weapon that is Map-Reduce.

Read full review

• Azure Cosmos DB may be expensive on its own, but it was cheaper than increasing the size/power of our VMs running SQL Server instances enough to keep up with the volume and velocity of the unstructured data.
• We got the JSON data out of our SQL Servers and they quit tipping over.

Read full review

• Much faster development time.
• Price is fantastic compared to MSSQL when you consider OS costs and the entire package.
• Only negative to me is the lack of DBA skills for it, due to it being a new player in the field. I feel like that will get better as time moves on however.

Read full review