Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BetterCloud
Score 7.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
BetterCloud aims to eliminate up to 78% of SaaS management work by automating user lifecycle processes and day-to-day operations.N/A
Blissfully
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Blissfully is a complete SaaS management platform. It aims to give companies the visibility and tools needed to manage vendors, simplify IT operations, maintain compliance, and optimize spending.N/A
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center is an enterprise-grade IT Operations Management (ITOM) suite designed for the centralized administration of data center infrastructure, virtualized environments, and hybrid cloud workloads. The platform provides unified management across heterogeneous environments, including support for Windows Server, Linux, and Azure Stack HCI. System Center is Microsoft's ITOM stack for organizations that maintain a significant on-premise footprint, vs the company's Azure-based…
$1,323
Pricing
BetterCloudBlissfullyMicrosoft System Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Standard Edition
$1323
Datacenter Edition
$3607
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BetterCloudBlissfullyMicrosoft System Center
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsUsers are all employees within an organization that use the connected SaaS applications.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BetterCloudBlissfullyMicrosoft System Center
Considered Multiple Products
BetterCloud
Chose BetterCloud
Far and away a better capability when it comes to integrations and automation. My experience with BetterCloud, especially from a support perspective has ALWAYS been great. As the product has progressed from FLASHPANEL to g.bettecloud to app.bettercloud that support experience …
Chose BetterCloud
More functionality. More robust functionality. Better support. More expensive. Overall, better.
Chose BetterCloud
BetterCloud has a much more friendly UI when it comes to building workflows as I've mentioned before. Our team has visited Okta workflows a number of times but it was incredibly difficult to replicate our current BetterCloud workflows into Okta because the Okta UI for workflow …
Chose BetterCloud
When we evaluated the products, Bettercloud came through because of price and customer service. The company listens to you and takes the advise of the customers to help mold and create a better product. Okta was a close second choice, it is a great product as well. We have …
Chose BetterCloud
BetterCloud exists as a unique product that doesn't directly compete with many other products or companies. It does handle user management, policy management, security and compliance, and more but other products don't tie things together the same way that Bettercloud does. It …
Chose BetterCloud
There are very services that actually do what Bettercloud does, and we haven’t evaluated any because they usually fall under a group of enterprise software that I like to stay far away from. There are applications with similar goals, but there’s a lot of unnecessary …
Chose BetterCloud
BetterCloud has proven way more efficient than the native Google Admin application. It has saved us from having to perform custom programming for delegation admin tasks, and has been the best admin suite we have used to date.
Chose BetterCloud
Google is great, however, BetterCloud is able to go into the backend of Google which helps us out tremendously. Permissions with BetterCloud exceeds the application it is being used for which is amazing. BetterCloud's GUI is very easy to navigate, however, I feel it could be …
Chose BetterCloud
Compared to WiseStamp - BetterCloud is much more advanced for the purpose of creating, managing, applying, and updating signatures for users of a Google domain. Signatures can be applied by User, Group, or ORG, and policies can be created to reapply signatures according to a …
Blissfully
Chose Blissfully
We initially investigated other alternatives, but found that Blissfully was well suited for our needs. It had a good amount of pre-built functionality which was built based off of Blissfully's expertise; but also the ability to customize where we needed. Additionally, other …
Microsoft System Center
Chose Microsoft System Center
SCCM is often considered superior to Intune because it is more predictable and transparent in day-to-day operations. Errors in SCCM are clearer and easier to troubleshoot, whereas Intune issues can feel vague and harder to diagnose. SCCM also offers rich, built-in features such …
Chose Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center really integrated with our windows system better than any other 3rd party product which obviously you would expect to a certain extent. Our main reason to procuring System Center (apart form the options)was licensing costs. We already had a Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft System Center
It has more intuitive features and business ready monitoring capabilities
Chose Microsoft System Center
None. We are a Microsoft business, and this is THE tool for imaging, packaging, remote support, and antivirus management. Microsoft's tool is the best for managing its software, systems, and antivirus clients. I will say that Microsoft Intune, the cloud platform, can be used …
Chose Microsoft System Center
The capability of SCOM as far as monitoring Windows systems is concerned is far greater than any monitoring product out there as both are a Microsoft product so integration and discoveries work well and fast.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Veeam Backup & Replication
Chose Microsoft System Center
The versatility of the suite of application provided by the Microsoft experience center was way above the other competitors , it helped gained leverage over the other products in the market . That why we made the decision of choosing Microsoft system center as a infrastructure …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We use Azure, we have lisences, so we have no needs any other cost.
And also, we want to save backup data in Azure.
Veritas ask additional cost reagurally and have to rebuild bakcup environment.
Chose Microsoft System Center
Because Datadog was too small, we decided quickly to use Microsoft System Center. We use a lot of other Microsoft products so that discussion was quickly set internally.
Chose Microsoft System Center
We have used Ghost from Symantec (licensed), FOG and Clonezilla which are freeware products. All three products had their pros and cons. The two freeware products were functional but did lack some polish, and Ghost was a good product for imaging of desktop computers. All did …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We are using Microsoft products for a long time, so the overall confidence played a part in the decision, the feature set and licensing cost was also very high when compared with above products, so we decided to use System Center for our environment, so far it has solved many …
Chose Microsoft System Center
We selected it simply because it is less expensive than the competition, but yet just as good. We saw no reason to go outside the walls of Microsoft for this task. We are satisfied with the product.
Chose Microsoft System Center
This was used to monitor uor non-Windows systems and was cumbersome. Their licensing was per device with how many agents you needed; however, with System Center Operations Manager, their billing was a lot easier for their product.
Chose Microsoft System Center
All comparative features are way expensive and complex to configure in all other competitors. Value to money and ease of deployment for Microsoft based environment
Chose Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center has more options. Microsoft System Center has the ability to image PCs as well as remotely connect to PCs, and software installation and patching where Symantec Ghost Solution Suite didn't handle all of these options as well. We haven't looked at many …
Chose Microsoft System Center
Much better UI for system center. Also, Tivoli was discontinued, so it was an easy decision. Altiris was acquired by Symantec but was unreliable and painful. It's UI was unresponsive and generally outdated. It wouldn't clean up old packages and would hog GB of disk space, …
Chose Microsoft System Center
SCOM is better than OMi for Windows-based servers monitoring.
You need to know how to use Visual Studio to customize the management pack.
Dynatrace is way better for all Application Performance Manager.
Chose Microsoft System Center
It has its similarities between the two from a ticketing standpoint but as a primarily Microsoft shop it is nice to have a product that was created to play along with other tools that we are using such as SCCM. We like Jira for the project management tools and Cherwell for …
Chose Microsoft System Center
It is an excellent product for monitoring features like Exchange, Active Directory, DNS. Monitors are custom designed and can be adjusted to any system. Great monitors can be created even when monitoring open-source systems.
Chose Microsoft System Center
It is used to monitor network device health status, similar to SCOM. Microsoft SCOM is far superior, however.
Chose Microsoft System Center
This is our first solution and we have been using it for many years.
Chose Microsoft System Center
How SCEP stacks up against some of the other AV solutions/products is that it does a pretty good job overall (not the best in the industry) at detecting/removing malware, which is the main focus for a product like this. It is also easy to use on the end-user side, which can't …
Best Alternatives
BetterCloudBlissfullyMicrosoft System Center
Small Businesses
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
Teams Manager
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BetterCloudBlissfullyMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BetterCloudBlissfullyMicrosoft System Center
Likelihood to Recommend
The manual deprovisioning and permissions management Bettercloud provides is really good. The state of workflow automations however is not where it needs to be, particularly if we can't use those workflows to automate user creation using not just our default username/email convention, but one that is very common across most organizations.
Read full review
If companies are looking for ways to manage their on-boarding and off-boarding processes you won't find a better tool than Blissfully. Blissfully also does a nice job of surfacing SAAS software that your staff is using. It is a great tool to use to help keep your SAAS accounts accurate.
Read full review
We used a product before that was designed to prevent users making changes and saving files to the desktop computer. This required a renewal of the license. By using SCCM in our environment we were able to discontinue using that product because SCCM allows us to completely restore a machine back to the original configuration. We have taught our users to save their individual work on either a network drive or a cloud drive. By doing this, if we do a re-image of their machine they have lost no data, and it makes for a faster resolution. In some instances having a computer in our SCCM environment it can become cumbersome when creating new users for very specific purposes. It can be done by creating new organizational units and applying new policies but when in a pinch it can be frustrating. For the most part we have tried to make "new" purpose images and groups to at least accommodate a quick install.
Read full review
Pros
  • Allows us to quickly audit and assign delegates to email account, something that's completely missing in Google as an administrative function
  • Allows us to automate offboarding of a Google account
  • Allows us to perform bulk actions, like assigning email signatures and forwarding to hundreds of accounts at a time
  • Allows us to audit Google Drive files. Orphaned files are very common in Google Workspace, and BetterCloud allows us to find them and take ownership of them.
Read full review
  • Access tracking and revocation.
  • On-boarding and off-boarding workflows.
  • Systems spend tracking, per team.
  • Internal access and purchasing ticketing.
Read full review
  • Allows us to visualize our systems in a single interface and see the status of health as well as relevant performance metrics.
  • A flexible and powerful interface with active alerting covering domain controllers, SQL servers, etc...
  • Allows you to customize your views and workspaces for specific tasks and needs.
  • Reporting is powerful and flexible.
Read full review
Cons
  • Integration with Google in the App version to allow pushing of email signatures, this feature is available in the legacy version.
  • More canned reports, although custom reports are available for you to build yourself.
  • More onsite visits with customers if available, to be onsite and see what challenges are available first hand.
Read full review
  • Integrations with all systems for automated access grants or revoking.
  • Ability to create a user within corporation prior to their start date.
Read full review
  • One of the biggest drawbacks to SCOM is the sheer scope and complexity of the system. This can be a pro and a con. The system is very customizable, what you put into it is what you'll get out of it. That said, the learning curve is fairly steep. An organization needs to be committed to putting time and resources into SCOM to get the most out of it. I've heard stories from colleagues of several different companies that invested in SCOM and then abandoned it due to the excessive time and care required.
  • SCOM is expensive. Not only is the enterprise licensing costly, SCOM requires it's own servers, operational and warehouse databases to be maintained.
  • The OOB SCOM reports are a bit clunky and feel outdated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager is tightly integrated to Microsoft Windows servers os monitoring with great product support.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support for BetterCloud is excellent. They have fantastic email support who are very responsive and knowledgeable, but more importantly they have chat support that are absolutely top-notch. They have not only the knowledge to answer and help, but the capability to solve without escalations or runarounds. These support folks are the real deal.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
There is a fair amount of documentation out there to help you when you have questions or run into issues with this product as well as tutorials on some of the more common tasks. Between the documentation and the overall ease of use we haven't had to deal with direct Microsoft support for this product.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Easy to install with intuitive interactive interface during the installation process a and integration to MS SQL was smooth
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Far and away a better capability when it comes to integrations and automation. My experience with BetterCloud, especially from a support perspective has ALWAYS been great. As the product has progressed from FLASHPANEL to g.bettecloud to app.bettercloud that support experience has stayed top notch.
Read full review
We initially investigated other alternatives, but found that Blissfully was well suited for our needs. It had a good amount of pre-built functionality which was built based off of Blissfully's expertise; but also the ability to customize where we needed. Additionally, other solutions try to do A LOT more, which makes it much more cumbersome to move over to because you're changing multiple systems as opposed to augmenting specific processes.
Read full review
None. We are a Microsoft business, and this is THE tool for imaging, packaging, remote support, and antivirus management. Microsoft's tool is the best for managing its software, systems, and antivirus clients. I will say that Microsoft Intune, the cloud platform, can be used for those with heavy 365 usage, but for us, that does not meet our current company needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Data monitoring: previously unavailable insight into our organization’s file-sharing habits and documents.
  • Granular roles: ability to set least-access permissions. And really, truly granular unlike some other applications.
  • Automation: we’ve already saved dozens of man hours using workflows. Gives us time to focus on things that matter without compromising common tasks.
Read full review
  • Eased our path to SOC 2 compliance.
  • Makes on-boarding more smooth.
  • Allows finance more insight into each teams spend.
Read full review
  • The positive impact it has had on ROI is that it has been a solid AV product in our environment, meaning it has worked well when running on client computers. It doesn't use a lot of system resources on the client-side, so that helps end-users productivity of not being slowed down.
  • It has been good for the end-user, since they really don't need to take additional training or consult user manuals, in how to use the product.
Read full review
ScreenShots

BetterCloud Screenshots

Screenshot of BetterCloud DashboardScreenshot of The Integration CenterScreenshot of Offboarding WorkflowScreenshot of Content Scanning Alert

Blissfully Screenshots

Screenshot of Vendor ManagementScreenshot of Compliance Access Matrix