Bound vs. Request Metrics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bound
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Bound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…N/A
Request Metrics
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Request Metrics is presented as a fast, simple, and affordable way to monitor the real user performance of a website. The vendor states they approach APM differently, rather than trying to understand everything about every part of a system, their solution focuses on understanding the performance as experienced by real users, and showing metrics that any developer can understand. Request Metrics is built for the small busy software teams that can't spend all their time and budget on software…N/A
Pricing
BoundRequest Metrics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoundRequest Metrics
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptional$10 monthly page views
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoundRequest Metrics
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
BoundRequest Metrics
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.7
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Request Metrics
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.8
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Request Metrics
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Request Metrics
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Bound
-
Ratings
Request Metrics
9.0
1 Ratings
17% above category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoundRequest Metrics
Small Businesses
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoundRequest Metrics
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoundRequest Metrics
Likelihood to Recommend
Bound Systems, Inc.
I think the customer service and relationship we have with Get Smart Content is great
Read full review
TrackJS
Request Metrics is great for small web development teams that want to make fast web applications. It was quick for us to get started and we could use the reports right away without having to read through documentation. If you just need to get some performance metrics, Request Metrics is perfect. It would not be so good for a larger team or a complex backend application as it is pretty limited in what it can measure.
Read full review
Pros
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • Connects easily with other APIs such as Demandbase and Google Analytics.
  • Easily create segments.
  • Easily create segmented content.
Read full review
TrackJS
  • Performance charts are really simple and easy for us to understand what is happening
  • It was easy to get started and doesn't need administration or training
  • It's affordable for our team
  • It's fast
Read full review
Cons
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • When you set up a campaign you should be able to set up content while in the campaign.
  • You should be able to set up new segments while in the campaign.
Read full review
TrackJS
  • I wish that it could also do uptime checking of the site
  • There is not enough detail to drill into individual users
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bound Systems, Inc.
It has the inability to export subject line or ISP complaints that require manual pulling by each campaign when needed. Results from variable tests are also reported only as a percentage of chosen KPI (opens, clicks, etc.). There's no ability to see hard numbers from the tests or other metrics to determine the statistical significance or unintended results (maybe opens increased per the test, but we saw clicks or conversions were lower). On the other hand, Bound performs absolutely great.
Read full review
TrackJS
We also consider Speedcurve and Calibre for monitoring. Speedcurve was really nice, but the reports were slow. We had to wait a lot to get information. It was also out of our budget and would require extra justification to use it. Calibre was also nice, but the numbers were based on synthetic rather than real user performance. We felt that this wasn't as helpful for us.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • We have seen more traffic going to revenue generating sites after using Get Smart Content. I'm not sure of the dollar amount since that's a separate department, but traffic increasing is great.
  • Engagement on our internal site has increased after implementing Get Smart Content. We are getting more views, comments and likes on our content than before.
Read full review
TrackJS
  • The launch of our project dashboard was much smoother and more successful because we could fix problems earlier
  • It fit without our existing operations budget
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bound Screenshots

Screenshot of Campaign viewScreenshot of Segment viewScreenshot of Segment list

Request Metrics Screenshots

Screenshot of Website performance dashboard rolls up the performance of your users as well as the busiest and slowest URLs.Screenshot of Page performance report shows you the performance distribution and breakdown of a single normalized URL as well as web vitals.Screenshot of API endpoint performance report shows you the performance distribution and breakdown of an API call.Screenshot of Alert history report shows you when and why an alert was triggered with the history of the URL.