BricsCAD is a computer-aided design (CAD) toolkit, supporting 2D drawing, 3D modeling and visualizations, and is customizable as well as compatible with many 3rd party applications, developed by Belgian company Bricsys, a Hexagon company since late 2018.
$314
per year
Ironclad
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
N/A
SOLIDWORKS
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Dassault Systemes offers SOLIDWORKS, a computer-aided design (CAD) system for education and manufacturing supporting 2D or 3D design, electrical design, simulations, and product development with collaboration tools.
$1,295
per year
Pricing
BricsCAD
Ironclad
SOLIDWORKS
Editions & Modules
BricsCAD Lite
$590
one-time fee
BricsCAD Pro
$1,265
one-time fee
BricsCAD Mechanical
$1,780
one-time fee
BricsCAD BIM
$1,890
one-time fee
BricsCAD Ultimate
$2,100
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Solidworks Annual Subscription
1,295
per year
Solidworks Standard
3,996
per standalone license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BricsCAD
Ironclad
SOLIDWORKS
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BricsCAD
Ironclad
SOLIDWORKS
Features
BricsCAD
Ironclad
SOLIDWORKS
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
BricsCAD
8.4
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Ironclad
-
Ratings
SOLIDWORKS
8.6
3 Ratings
15% above category average
3D Modeling
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
2D Drafting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Rendering and Visualization
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Parametric Design
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.73 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Customization and Extensions
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.13 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Assembly Design
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.83 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
BricsCAD
-
Ratings
Ironclad
6.4
5 Ratings
23% below category average
SOLIDWORKS
-
Ratings
Contract creation
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract templates
00 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
00 Ratings
3.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided logic
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
BricsCAD
-
Ratings
Ironclad
7.6
5 Ratings
7% below category average
SOLIDWORKS
-
Ratings
Contract sharing
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract editing
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval process
00 Ratings
7.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
00 Ratings
7.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
BricsCAD
-
Ratings
Ironclad
5.1
5 Ratings
47% below category average
SOLIDWORKS
-
Ratings
Contract database
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract search
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
00 Ratings
2.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom contract reports
00 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tracking contract status
00 Ratings
4.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance check
00 Ratings
3.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
SMBs who do want to minimse their involvement with expensinve, inconvenient and bloated Autodesk products will find lots to love. The only hinderence is the market share of Autodesk means some 3rd party developers will not support it unfortunately, but it has it's own solutions to many things users of the AutoCAD ecosystem currenrtly rely on.
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
As a mechanical engineer, it is one of the best tools to just start modeling and engineering with. The UI tools are intuitive and engineering analysis such Mold Analysis, FEA, are great! Other 3D CAD modeling tools have a longer learning curve to master. All in all, if you're not planning to design an entire airplane with large assembly files, then Solidworks is your tool!
The collaborative work environment is a cool and useful feature where groups of people can work on the same model at the same time, and SOLIDWORKS ensures that you don't overwrite each other's work.
The ease and amount of customization options are very useful for creating a personalized and intuitive user interface, whether SOLIDWORKS is your native CAD package or not.
It is very easy to quickly edit a model you have already created. The software allows sketch and feature editing without having to take the time to actually enter the sketch/feature environment.
The use of configurations and configurations-specific dimensions in the same sketch is very useful for creating different forms of the same part
there is not full compatibility with dynamic blocks but it isn't so bad -we can create them in AutoCAD and use them to some extent anyway
it doesn't look as "sexy" and the interface looks kinda orimitive in some screens but the functionality is all there and the some
there is the hurdle of users thinking they are getting a lesser product so more marketing pozazz is needed to get the message over it is a very capable product
Save DWG 2D files in inches or metric easily, defaults to metric and has to be manually converted to inches
When using the sketch feature, the ability to disable ALL references. If I don't know the exact shape and I want to draw/adapt my design, it harshly interprets the references which have no value to me. The easiest exact is to think about when you have a Microsoft Word document that has a lot of formatting, photos, tabs, etc. If you accidentally hit the "enter" key, you can explode the formatting and everything goes crazy. SW does this to me, I just want to "doodle" my sketches, edit/delete/etc and not be bound by arbitrary references.
For the sketch feature, ability to use a DraftSight plugin of some sort. I'm super fast in DS, if I could draw using the commands in SW then I would probably never open DS again and convert to SW full time. Currently, I only use SW as a way to convert 3D files so I can build everything in DraftSight.
it's exteremly useable. AutoCAD users will carry over many eisting skills and learn some new ones on the cross over. It's fast adn lightweight meaning ot can be run on just about any PC. The help and support are realy good and problems are usually responded to within a day by experts.
Ironclad is the best tool I have used to date, to manage workflow and tickets. It was very easy to use and navigate from the very first time I used it. My time is very valuable and I don't have time to sit in training sessions, simply to use a new product. I'm happy to say that I was never formally trained on Ironclad as it simply wasn't necessary.
I have been using SOLIDWORKS for around 12 years as of writing this review, so have learned where most things are and how they work. When first starting out it was quite daunting, but the interface is well laid out with like functions near each other which made finding new functions relatively easy.
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
We have an unusual arrangement. We don’t pay for support, but we’re partnered with a VAR for second-tier support.
I work with other users if I have questions but when we’ve had to ask the VAR, they always have answers. It appears that all of the VARs have access to a support platform from DS SOLIDWORKS that helps them answer most questions.
Very cost-effective solution, it even supports pointclouds natively and is something we will investigate further as time goes on and may in fact utilise it to replace AutoCAD with 3rd party add-ins at some point in the future, and we hope it can further reduce costs in the long-run as it continues to develop and mature.
Onshape is a direct competitor. It has great entry level pricing and it is easy to access with no installation required. Being a web based app there is sometime some lag being based in NZ. Management also have concerns over where the data is stored on the cloud. With SW we can control where it is stored
At Gusto, where we operated on no contracts for many years, Ironclad allowed us to create a very simple process for getting approval for, and keeping records of, customized pricing on our new, high-end plan.
Wasn't part of the buying committee, but in my current role it's been heavily utilized externally for customer contracts, but also internally for employee agreements.
I don't have any actual numbers, and don't have a way to compare it to any prior e-signature setup.