TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about GitLab

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

GitLab

Connect with GitLab

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with GitLab so that GitLab and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bugzilla

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    GitLab

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AGitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps, where software teams enable AI at every stage of the software lifecycle to ship faster. The platform enables teams to automate repetitive tasks across planning, building, securing, testing, deploying, and maintaining software.

    $0

    per month per user

    Veracode

    Score8.5 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
    Pricing
    BugzillaGitLabVeracode
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab Free (self-managed)
    $0
    GitLab Free
    $0
    GitLab Premium
    $29
    per month per user
    GitLab Premium (self-managed)
    $29
    per month per user
    GitLab Ultimate
    Contact Sales
    GitLab Ultimate (self-managed)
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BugzillaGitLabVeracode
    Free Trial
    NoYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsGitLab Credits enable flexible, consumption-based access to agentic AI capabilities in the GitLab platform, allowing you to scale AI adoption at your own pace while maintaining cost predictability. Powered by Duo Agent Platform, GitLab’s agentic AI capabilities help software teams to collaborate at AI speed, without compromising quality and enterprise security. If usage exceeds monthly allocations and overage terms are accepted, automated on-demand billing activates without service interruption, so your developers never lose access to AI capabilities they need. Real-time dashboards provide transparency into AI consumption patterns. Software teams can see usage across users, projects, and groups with granular attribution for cost allocation. Automated threshold alerts facilitate proactive planning. Advanced analytics deliver trending, forecasting, and FinOps integration.Developer pricing options available
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BugzillaGitLabVeracode
    Considered Multiple Products
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    GitLab
    No answer on this topic
    Veracode
    Chose Veracode
    We selected Veracode after testing these tools with 3 important solutions and Veracode had a great ratio of findings, with low false positive, and the best price between the tools that were good enough.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Sonar cube was quicker, but not as thorough. Both integrated into our CI/CD pipeline, however the integration for Veracode is more straight forward.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode is much better at uncovering security weaknesses and providing information and consulting. I use Veracode because our company decided for.
    Incentivized
    Chose Veracode
    Veracode is a solution easy to set up and integrate with virtually any pipeline--a single product for three solutions.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Would buy again
    150 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    128 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    135 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    90 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    152 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    132 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92 Answers
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    76 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    120 Answers
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    101 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    BugzillaGitLabVeracode
    Small Businesses
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    GitGuardian
    Score9 out of 10
    Rencore Code (SPCAF)
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Sentry
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Checkmarx
    Score7.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BugzillaGitLabVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.7
    (18 ratings)
    8.6
    (168 ratings)
    8.3
    (144 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.0
    (10 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    6.3
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.8
    (20 ratings)
    5.5
    (29 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    2.7
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.1
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    7.7
    (67 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BugzillaGitLabVeracode
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    Buzilla is easy to use and provides basic functionality to use as a bug tracking tool. If big size attachments are allowed it would have been great. Also with Bugzilla home->Test management area is improved by allowing multiple sections it would be awesome!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    In general it's a good product with a huge number of features. It can do CI/CD checks, deployment, repo hosting, integrations etc. A lot of it can be managed from just the UI but also has an ok API. It does tend to release new features semi-often too which is nice. It can have a steep learning curve for certain features so not a starter-friendly vendor, but great for most businesses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode helped us our team's developers in saving time significantly. For instance, if I take a library and assume it's going to work until it reaches QA or UAT, where we find out there's a vulnerability, that can require extensive effort for code refactoring or redesigning; Veracode helps prevent that before the pull request is merged.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Open source! No license fee involved, no limit to the number of licenses.
    • Easy to install and maintain. Installation is very easy and hardly needs any maintenance efforts, except when migrating from one version to other. Each project can have its own group of users.
    • Includes all the core features/fields that are needed to log a software bug/issue.
    • Multiple attachments are possible, supports various formats.
    • Good for reporting. Filtering mechanism lets you query bugs by various parameters.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    • GitLab excels in managing code versions, allowing easy tracking of changes, branch management, and merging contributions.
    • It helps maintain code stability and reliability, saving time and effort in the development or research workflow.
    • Powerful code review features, enabling collaboration and feedback among team members.
    • Robust project management features, including issue tracking, kanban boards, and milestones.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • It is good at recommending fixing issues with third-party dependencies used in application code with detailed version information and knowing which version fixes what.
    • It has a very nice interface for triaging flaws. One can sort the vulnerabilities found in code from Very Likely to be exploited to least likely to be exploited.
    • There is a collections feature that allows us to group together groups of application profiles belonging to the same suite of applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • Cloud Based. I'd like to see bugzilla be cloud based. The company I currently work with made a final decision to change db's for this specific reason. Due to the frequency of travel in this company, they need access to bugzilla from differing national / international locations.
    • Larger File Attachments. I believe the limit of a bugzilla content upload is 4 megabytes. For many of our video'd issues, this file size is simply impractical without the additional effort exertion on video compressor applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    • CI variables management is sometimes hard to use, for example, with File type variables. The scope of each variable is also hard to guess.
    • Access Token: there are too many types (Personal, Project, global..), and it is hard to identify the scope and where it comes from once created.
    • Runners: auto-scaled runners are for the moment hard to put in place, and monitoring is not easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
    • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
    • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Open Source
    For future projects I will look at something that is hosted in the cloud that I don't have to manage. I would also like something that has a more modern feel to allow my customers to use it as well as my employees.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    I really feel the platform has matured quite faster than others, and it is always at the top of its game compared to the different vendors like GitHub, Azure pipelines, CircleCI, Travis, Jenkins. Since it provides, agents, CI/CD, repository hosting, Secrets management, user management, and Single Sign on; among other features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    This is a pretty straightforward system. You put in the bug details, a ticket is created, the team is notified. The user interface reflects this very simple and straightforward flow. It's certainly much easier than trying to track bugs with using Excel and email.
    Read full review
    GitLab
    - As a combination of features and products, GitLab is a really great tool for developers. - Also, it comes with both light and quick changes in a web browser version, as well as pro work in VS Code mode. However, in certain areas, such as large-scale issues/incidents, management can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    - Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Open Source
    I used it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    I've never had experienced outages from GItlab itself, but regarding the code I have deployed to Gitlab, the history helps a lot to trace the cause of the issue or performing a rollback to go back to a working version
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode has always been up and available to us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Open Source
    I like this rating.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    GItlab reponsiveness is amazing, has never left me IDLE. I've never had issues even with complex projects. I have not experienced any issues when integrating it with agents for example or SSO
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    Since it is open source, it doesn't have customer service. However, the amount of information on forums is vast. If you can wade through it, you'll get what you need
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    At this point, I do not have much experience with Gitlab support as I have never had to engage them. They have documentation that is helpful, not quite as extensive as other documentation, but helpful nonetheless. They also seem to be relatively responsive on social media platforms (twitter) and really thrived when GitHub was acquired by Microsoft
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Open Source
    I know it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Open Source
    Implementation was pretty simple. Particularly because the product cannot be customized so there is not much to do apart from getting it up and running.
    Read full review
    GitLab
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    We migrated away from the whole suite of Rational tools because of their massive complexity around administration and inflexibility regarding workflows. In addition, the suite was insanely expensive, and users hated the usability of the tools. We evaluated, and liked JIRA, but because the organization was looking for cost savings, we ended up going with Bugzilla and it's FOSS model so as to avoid ongoing costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    GitHub is an inferior product from most points of view. We had to use it and the teams finds no positives about it. Everything is a downgrade from our previous GitLab solution. GitLab CI\CD is vastly superior to workflows, for example doing a manual node is just "when : manual" in GitLab while you have to do clickops in GitHub to achieve the same. No overview of code in branches is a minus when we tried to figure out what our colleagues are trying to merge as it looked off.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    GitLab
    No answers on this topic
    Veracode
    No idea
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Open Source
    I used it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    I think is very well designed, and like any VCS it works as intended
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    It meets our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • It has made the SDLC process more efficient. Bugs were logged and tracked in emails or in Excel sheets leading to slow communication and at time version issues with multiple files. Being an online tool, Bugzilla solved those issues, improved communication, instant status updates and improved efficiency.
    • We have used Bugzilla with a lot of federal goverment agencies (DHS, CMS, SAMHSA, CDC, HHS etc). Project Directors adn Principle Investigators were at times given access to Bugzilla which provided a snapshot of open vs closed issues.
    • Some groups would resist using Bugzilla with the email reminders being the main reason. Turning off or reminding them of features where we can 'control' email notification helped a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GitLab
    • GitLab cut down our spent on container, package and infrastructure registry
    • Best thing is we can now have everything in single platform which cost effective too
    • Quality of support is really good and they do have emergency support team as well which is great
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Veracode
    • Positive: Scanning all our applications on Veracode provides us an overview of our cyber security posture for the organization as a whole.
    • Positive: Performing the SAST, SCA and DAST scanning for all the applications at the early stages of the SDLC helps us identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities early, reducing the risk of data breaches and cyber-attacks.
    • Negative: Sometimes Veracode SAST scanner closed and reopens some findings, leading to reliability issues on the scanner itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GitLab Screenshots

    Screenshot of What is Intelligent Orchestration for DevSecOps?Screenshot of an overview of GitLab Duo Agent PlatformScreenshot of a new agent creation screen

    Veracode Screenshots

    Screenshot of a fixScreenshot of the Veracode PlatformScreenshot of SCAScreenshot of SCA Github