A major problem of storing Dynamics 365 documents in SharePoint is the missing synchronization of privileges and permissions. This allows unauthorized SharePoint users to access private documents and sensitive data even if they don’t have CRM privileges to do so. CB Replicator, is an out-of-the-box solution that is designed to remedy this issue by automatically synchronizing Dynamics CRM privileges with SharePoint permissions.
$3,600
per 100 users
Mikogo
Score1.2 out of 10
N/A
Mikogo is a free screen sharing solution with built-in VoIP for online meetings, web presentations, web conferencing and sales demos.
$156
Annually
Pricing
CB Replicator
Mikogo
Editions & Modules
CB Dynamics CRM to SharePoint Permission Replicator for 100 User
$3,600
per 100 users
Basic Annual
$156
Annually
Professional Annual
$228
Annually
Professional Lifetime
$456
Lifetime License per User
Team Annual
$468
Annually
Team Lifetime
$936
Lifetime License [Unlimited Users]
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CB Replicator
Mikogo
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$80 per user
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Enterprise plans are also available for larger organizations, with a custom number of users, meeting participants, and channels. Master Administration and Web API integrations are also available. Contact Mikogo for further information.
More Pricing Information
Features
CB Replicator
Mikogo
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of CB Permissions Replicator and Mikogo
Feature
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Mikogo
3.1
4 Ratings
87% below category average
High quality audio
00 Ratings
4.14 Ratings
High quality video
00 Ratings
4.14 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
00 Ratings
1.14 Ratings
Mobile support
00 Ratings
3.22 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of CB Permissions Replicator and Mikogo
Feature
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Mikogo
6.0
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Desktop sharing
00 Ratings
2.24 Ratings
Whiteboards
00 Ratings
9.82 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of CB Permissions Replicator and Mikogo
Feature
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Mikogo
3.0
4 Ratings
93% below category average
Calendar integration
00 Ratings
1.12 Ratings
Meeting initiation
00 Ratings
1.24 Ratings
Record meetings / events
00 Ratings
2.14 Ratings
Slideshows
00 Ratings
7.63 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of CB Permissions Replicator and Mikogo
Feature
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Mikogo
2.1
4 Ratings
117% below category average
Live chat
00 Ratings
1.24 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
3.13 Ratings
Q&A
00 Ratings
2.13 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of CB Permissions Replicator and Mikogo
It is an ideal program for the portfolio of already consolidated clients, for large financial companies with a high professional profile. In the cases that I do not recommend it, it is for small and medium-sized financial companies, with a portfolio of clients in training, since the cost-benefit ratio is not attractive.
Pros Mikogo is well-suited and cost-effective for the small business Simple & well-designed; easy to figure out. Works best for one-on-one client support. Cons No live customer support Free version has limited features (e.g. no invite meeting allowed) Trial version only 14 days
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The graphics could be developed in a better way, they should be more modern, friendly and show the information in more detail.
Develop a module in the application that allows personalization by the user, giving him the possibility to manage a tool made by him to suit him. Moves the APPS Mobile concept to the design of the program.
Although the tool is well integrated with Microsoft, you can think of a development of integration with social networks or mobile developments, both users, and customers.
Develop a more economical and simple version, aimed at small and medium enterprises, with small client portfolios
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a complementary tool of the main CRM, which provides an adequate management of the documentation, reports, files that are derived from the business activity. It offers adequate levels of security for small businesses, the implementation is easy compared to other tools, it is easy to use, it offers adequate file capacity. In the future it can be strengthened with access to the cloud, development of apps and integration with other platforms.
As it has already been said before, it is a simple implementation program, easy to use, with a short learning curve, with a friendly interface, a good design, a security according to the type of company and with the possibility of personalization. It provides an accessible cost tool to improve business management and document management.
Until now, technical support has not been required to a large extent, but for this question three variables must be taken into account; The level of complexity of the implementation of the tool, the courses, tutorials, training and learning curve of the users, and finally the technical support as such. This tool has implementation attributes and ease of use, reducing the incidence of technical support.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Check the seller's website, read the technical specifications of the product, calculate the investment in personnel, software and hardware, validate that the management modules document is what they are looking for. Project the integration of the program with the systems that the company manages. Read many reviews and note the most important points of the user experiences.
Basically, my main experience is focused on Dynamics, I have worked with similar tools developed in a particular way by the firms for which I have worked. They are monitoring tools developed by the system and planning area. For the internal use of the company. Obviously, this is a leading international program.
Mikogo has simple features and is easy to use. If you don't need lots of bells and whistles and just want to screen share or video conference on a small scale Mikogo works best. Join.me & TeamViewer are a bit confusing for the novice small business person. My experience with LogMeIn has been that it's sluggish. GoToMeeting works great but is pricey for the small firm that mainly does one-to-one support/training. I couldn't get Zoom to work right.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Without speaking directly of figures, on the positive side of the implementation of the program is tied to the time of learning the tool. In practice, it is much easier to learn by professionals, making the implementation time short, as well as, minimizes the margin of error in the initial handling of the program.
As it is a tool for easy learning and with a reduction in the margin of error due to the learning curve, it allows working only with the technical support offered by the provider, without having the need to create an internal department of attention to the user, which lowers costs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info