Centercode Connect is a hosted software platform that provides all of the tools needed to run a beta program: recruiting, NDA management, product distribution, surveys, bug reports, forums, reporting, and more.
N/A
TestFlight
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
TestFlight is a test tool that aims to make it easy to invite users to test apps and app clip experiences and collect valuable feedback before releasing your apps on the App Store. Users can invite up to 10,000 testers using their email address or by sharing a public link.
To me personally, the user interface wasn't as daunting as it was compared to confluence or product board. It made it easier to use without the need to undergo training. Keeping it simple and secure are just a few of its great asset features and together with ease of access …
Google forms is fairly limited in conditional questioning, and the customization of question/form types. It also lacks the robust reporting on results that Centercode provides. While this may work for smaller testing and operations, any long-term Beta testing community …
Centercode is better than Google Forms and Sheets for our use case of a long ongoing beta with participants rotating in and out 10000x times better. However, it might be a little too complex for what we needed. We may have been better off with something in the middle--a little …
Only Centercode could provide all of our desired tools in one platform. In the vetting process, we looked at a variety of customer testing platforms, but all competitors would have to be used in conjunction with another tool to support our ask. Centercode has everything we need …
The other solutions available aren't complete community management. They bold on or require you to implement things on your own. Centercode is the only out of the box solution which offers a comprehensive solution.
TestFlight
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestFlight
I have used other stores and other test software, such as the Google Play console to work with Android applications. However, I have seen that TestFLight is much more agile in the way it organizes users to be able to do the tests and the information is much more concise and …
We chose TestFlight because of its ease of use and comprehensive control over the respective test environments. No other app could be so easily conditioned by our testers and nowhere have we received feedback on our apps so easily and directly. It was also always easy, …
Managing beta tester users and mobile app versions is easier and more intuitive with Google's platform. As it is cross-platform, the same application code will be compatible with iOS, Android, and Web devices. Rich and detailed documentation. Reduction of costs and deadlines, …
When it comes to simplicity and effectiveness, TestFlight makes it much more appealing to run multiple test cycles and get much hight reporting than in cases of the competition. In some cases, the knowledge ramp-up speed is worth focusing on TestFlight as it's super fast and …
I selected it just because I use Apple devices and the more Apps we use in the business are neither native from the AppStores nor well suited on the Apple devices, so I started using it not because of the goal of the software, but because I discovered it from the apps we use …
TestFlight is integrated right with iOS and the toolset seems to just work with the rest of Apple's ecosystem verses when we used Hockey, which felt like it was bolted on.
The better question here is for the company themselves. How important is the quality of your product and your user experience? Instead of managing things via Google Docs, spreadsheets and email, how about have a portal which organizes feedback, provides a platform to complete end-to-end testings and create a community? Centercode is that solution.
TestFlight has been particularly useful for us when we wanted to test different aspects of our apps with large groups. The ease of use made it possible for non-technical students to participate in the tests. This also allowed us to get feedback from those groups of people that we would not have been able to reach or would have had difficulty reaching with other test environments.
The Project Management style of logging tasks allows us to be nitty gritty with our beta testing
The ability to be able to cross check what other or similar items in the group captured adds value by visibly other issue similarity other testers captured
The ability to manage view access on a SSO config allows easy access only to those that are part of the actual beta testers on a "need to know" basis
To me personally, the user interface wasn't as daunting as it was compared to Confluence or product board. It made it easier to use without the need to undergo training. Keeping it simple and secure are just a few of its great asset features and together with ease of access (SSO) better controls of people view/access limitations
I have used other stores and other test software, such as the Google Play console to work with Android applications. However, I have seen that TestFLight is much more agile in the way it organizes users to be able to do the tests and the information is much more concise and directly what needs to be done. In the Google Play console there are too many sections with too much information.