Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Emptoris
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$59
Per User Per Month
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
Emptoris
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Emptoris
$59.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
Emptoris
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia FM Cloud
Emptoris
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
Emptoris
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
7% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
23% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
1 Ratings
16% above category average
Emptoris
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Emptoris
8.3
4 Ratings
3% above category average
Contract creation
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Contract templates
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Guided logic
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Emptoris
7.9
4 Ratings
3% below category average
Contract sharing
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Contract editing
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
00 Ratings
7.53 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Approval process
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
If you have a highly bureaucratic organization that is heavily focused on procurement, Emptoris can provide some value. It seemed to be very good at linking the contract information to procurement for better spend control. If you are trying to implement a standalone contract management solution that allows you to easily create contracts and store them in a central location, this isn't the tool for you. There doesn't appear to be a simplified implementation. In general, when a SaaS solution has a complicated and expensive implementation, I am very skeptical. This does not show that the vendor is trying to move customers forward on a single code base. If that many things need to be done during implementation, you are starting to customize the solution for every customer. This hurts the vendor's ability to scale and make improvements in the future.
Document protection - the Check Out contract feature is a great way to allow external parties to make modifications to contract language without the ability to accept those changes. Those redlines can then be imported back into Emptoris and reviewed or further modified as needed.
Notifications & reminders - you can trigger an email manually from within the system, or you can configure automated notifications andreminders to alert users when a new task is received or has aged a given amount of days, etc.
Interview wizard - there is a lot of value in the interview wizard. Administrators can configure screens with selecting options via check boxes, radio buttons, or typed-in values. Variables and conditions can be used to selectively populate fields within the contract or apply other options, making for a quick and convenient method to generate contracts conforming to corporate standards.
Field customization - administrators can customize a list of options for various fields including contract substatus, address type, and user created business term variables.
Approvals - many different options are available to configure approvals to trigger automatically upon presenting and/or executing the contract including specific individuals, one or more approver groups, or based upon various criteria including terms within the contract, type of contract, or the contract's owning organization.
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
Reporting, Emptoris comes with standard reports which can not always can be fit into our business. This needs to be improved. I hope Emptoris is addressing this issue in their latest releases.
Though the feature of editing language in MS word is excellent, loading MS word takes time.
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
There are a lot of new, exciting products coming out in every field and I believe that there is always something better right over the horizon. If it was my choice, I would review my usage of Emptoris and other software periodically to make sure I'm using the most efficient software possible.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
The above rating for the overall support from Emptoris is for their product / product support, roll out training and refresher training / ongoing training, which is not only good but superior. There is no major or reconizable bad review that can be given to Emptoris at this point in time, from where is stands.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
I am a fan of Ariba to be used for the entire lifecycle of Sourcing. From RFX's to cutting PO's. I feel Emptoris misses the boat on the idea of a "One Stop Shop" for all of your Sourcing/Purchasing needs
We won the 2005 Baseline Magazine Award for best ROI related to a technology implementation with an ROI 5544% (see 2005 Baseline ROI Awards, GlaxoSmithkline).
We always felt we could do "two times the work, with half the people and deliver double the savings".