Cincopa is a video knowledge management platform that converts video and document assets into searchable, structured knowledge environments. The solution utilizes Artificial Intelligence (AI) to index multimedia content, allowing users to query libraries using natural language to locate specific information within media files. Key Capabilities Structured Knowledge Environments: The platform organizes Video Assets and Digital Documents into categorized…
$99
per month
WebinarJam
Score8.9 out of 10
N/A
WebinarJam is designed to allow users to host online events with HD streaming, interactive features like polls and chat, integrations, analytics, and payment processing that are intended to help maximize online growth.
$39
per month
Pricing
Cincopa
WebinarJam
Editions & Modules
Starter
$99.00
per month
Growth
$349.00
per month
Starter
$39
per month for 1 presenter and 100 attendees
Basic
$79
per month for 2 presenters and 500 attendees
Professional
$229
per month for 4 presenters and 2000 attendees
Enterprise
$379
per month for 6 presenters and 5000 attendees
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cincopa
WebinarJam
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cincopa
WebinarJam
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
8.6
17 Ratings
13% above category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
Lead generation
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video personalization
9.914 Ratings
00 Ratings
eCommerce
8.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for advertisements
8.59 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video SEO
8.913 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration to Marketing Automation
8.69 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
8.2
5 Ratings
28% above category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
Integration to Salesforce.com
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration to Marketo
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration to HubSpot
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
9.2
16 Ratings
7% above category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
Video access controls
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
User management
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video link sharing
9.915 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal video
9.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
External video
9.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
9.0
19 Ratings
9% above category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
Player customization
9.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded videos
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
9.9
14 Ratings
23% above category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
Per viewer tracking
10.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Per video tracking
9.914 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
9.712 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
8.7
15 Ratings
1% above category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
On-Demand video
9.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Live streaming
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video upload & format support
8.115 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video library / File management
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video portal
8.110 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
7.7
2 Ratings
3% below category average
WebinarJam
-
Ratings
Audience Q&A / Live chat
8.21 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video comments
7.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
-
Ratings
WebinarJam
4.8
8 Ratings
46% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
2.58 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
7.27 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
-
Ratings
WebinarJam
9.0
7 Ratings
10% above category average
High quality audio
00 Ratings
9.97 Ratings
Mobile support
00 Ratings
8.16 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
-
Ratings
WebinarJam
6.1
8 Ratings
29% below category average
Calendar integration
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Record meetings / events
00 Ratings
3.28 Ratings
Slideshows
00 Ratings
9.97 Ratings
Event registration
00 Ratings
3.28 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
-
Ratings
WebinarJam
7.3
8 Ratings
15% below category average
Audience polling
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Q&A
00 Ratings
4.78 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
Feature
Cincopa
-
Ratings
WebinarJam
10.0
7 Ratings
18% above category average
Participant roles & permissions
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Online Events Marketing
Comparison of Online Events Marketing features of Cincopa and WebinarJam
I would say that Cincopa is a first-stop for any dev project without an internal gallery option. This is especially true if the person in charge of content or building the galleries is not a coder. Cincopa makes designing a good looking gallery and inserting it into nearly any webpage a pretty simple process, so it is a great starting place. There may be other options that would fit a different development project better (internal gallery functions or a full-scale DAM with importable galleries), but for our purposes Cincopa was (and is) a perfect fit.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have used WebinarJam for many reasons. Our main reason is to host large free webinars but we have also used it for smaller live training courses that people paid for, we have held private training classes for companies, and so on. I guess you could get creative and use it for a conference-style virtual event but wouldn't really recommend it for that. You could use it for internal training within an organization and things but I still feel it best suited for webinars and marketing purposes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ADMIN/USER STRENGTHS: Easy to use the dashboard to start a webinar on demand, or schedule one in the future. Each step has a video tutorial made to set you up for success, understanding each set-up step along the way. If I want to practice a session live, I can set up a webinar instantly (called Right Now-takes 6 clicks and 30 seconds to set this up), and stream it through my YouTube Channel, or schedule a full campaign for a later date (takes about 10 minutes) and drive people to attend. I can set up one date, or multiple dates. It's very easy to follow the nine initial steps to (configuration, schedule, registration, notifications, integration, thank you, live, replay and finish) setting up your webinar. Once you have created a campaign, you can always clone them for future use.
ADMIN/USER STRENGTH: You can inject a pre-recorded video seamlessly. Let's say you did an incredible sales pitch on one of your webinars, you can inject this into future webinars to ensure a perfect presentation.
ADMIN/USER STRENGTH: Poll your customers BEFORE the webinar, on the registration page to find out what they are looking for, why they have signed up, to be sure the presenter covers each participant's needs.
ADMIN/USER STRENGTH: Autoresponder reminders can come from Webinar Jam (this is what I have always done to keep it simple) or integrate it with the top systems (AWeber, Active Campaign, Infusionsoft, IContact, MailChimp, ConvertKit, Drip, Kartra, Zapier).
ADMIN/USER STRENGTH: I can set up a replay for those who missed the event, or even a replica replay where I can go into the video, fix up my sales presentation, and add a new video for people to see. I can also see who watches the replay.
ADMIN/USER STRENGTH: In the analytics page I can see the numbers of people who visited the webinar registration page (to get an idea of how popular my topic was/change headings or topics if it's low, keep presenting if there's a high number), registrants, people in the room when I go live, and numbers for those who watched the replays. I can connect my autoresponder to communicate with people who missed the webinar/replay vs those who attended and even can see when people dropped off so I know if they were engaged for the entire webinar.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The number of pictures for the upload should be slightly higher.
The previous calculation of the traffic is difficult.
If many pictures have to be deleted from a gallery, that does not happen so fast, because only 50 pictures are loaded. Then you have to scroll all the way down and wait until the next 50 images are loaded, in order to be able to mark them for deletion. This takes a while with 800 pictures for example.
One of the biggest problems we have is that WebinarJam was sold to us as a lifetime license, and it was supposed to include broadcasting on Facebook. For reasons that were never clear, they stopped providing that functionality, which greatly reduced our use for the product.
WebinarJam started out life as an innovative product, full of promise. Things changed within the organization, key staff and players changed, and it seems that key players just moved on to other projects. Users were required to pay for upgrades in order to get the best use out of the product.
A big problem that was never really solved was the Lag/Delay between realtime and what the users were seeing and hearing.
We really wanted to be able to administer Surveys to people during webinars and be able to store their responses and export them to a database. We were told there was no way to do that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Cincopa is very easy to use, especially to the uninitiated. You don't need a degree in CS or years of experience to set-up a fantastic looking gallery. The interface is self-explanatory for the most part and very easy to use. The drag-and-drop functionality makes it simple and inviting for all users.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The platform is really hard to use and they have a habit of pushing out updates without telling their users first. The last update completely reverted all of our customizations back to the default EverWebinar layout. I only found out about this after a lead kindly send an email to the firm letting us know that [our] registration confirmation page was showing lorem ipsum script. Customization is lacking as well
The support overall is good. In the early days, it wasn't the best but they have definitely stepped it up lately. If you have questions about the platform, issues, setup, etc, and don't mind waiting 24 hours to get a response then it's good. They may have faster response times now but when they updated to 4.0 it took a while as they were getting hammered with emails cause there were issues. It seems like they have worked out some of the kinks so I imagine their support can respond much faster now. There is no phone number to call so there is no way to get immediate help or answers which can be frustrating when you have issues right before or during your webinar
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Cincopa has nice templates that are easy to use. The images can be moved about, more images added, and the size changed.
I particularly like the Pinterest style template, as it fits in well with the number of images that I need to display on my website. The more choices displayed, the more likely customers are to order.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I prefer WebinarJam due to its super-easy setup and great integration options. It works well with other tools like ClickFunnels, Hubspot and Mailchimp. From the tools we tried, this one seems to work the best for our company and clients!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The video that we uploaded to our website will show prospects in the area around our apartment community and hopefully give them a good idea of how close they can be to work/school.
Our video will result in more apartments being rented which will have a positive impact on our ROI.
Our video will give residents and prospects a positive image of our community.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WebinarJam has allowed us to present to multiple audiences at our prospective customers, rather than just a few individuals which made it difficult to get to the next sales step. By engaging a larger audience, we were able to drive more attention to our product and made follow up with the customer much easier.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info