Claris FileMaker vs. Cyfe, by Traject

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claris FileMaker
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
Cyfe
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Cyfe is all-in-one dashboard software for analyzing data from online services like Google Analytics, Salesforce, AdSense, MailChimp, Amazon, Facebook, etc, from Traject.
$29
per month
Pricing
Claris FileMakerCyfe, by Traject
Editions & Modules
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
Starter
$29
per month
Standard
$39
per month
Pro
$65
per month
Premier
$119
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claris FileMakerCyfe
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Claris FileMakerCyfe, by Traject
Features
Claris FileMakerCyfe, by Traject
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
8.0
4 Ratings
5% below category average
Cyfe, by Traject
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces4.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
6.6
28 Ratings
22% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings6.817 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings4.028 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.120 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
7.2
26 Ratings
11% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.715 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.120 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings10.09 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings2.026 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
5.0
23 Ratings
49% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings4.015 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings4.021 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings6.89 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings1.017 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
7.2
19 Ratings
10% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings3.018 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings8.614 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
7.1
22 Ratings
18% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings6.314 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.416 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings9.76 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
9.3
19 Ratings
19% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings9.418 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.713 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Cyfe, by Traject
7.0
7 Ratings
10% below category average
REST API00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings2.05 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings5.94 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings5.83 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Claris FileMakerCyfe, by Traject
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Claris FileMakerCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(51 ratings)
8.0
(29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(7 ratings)
9.4
(9 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(8 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(6 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Claris FileMakerCyfe, by Traject
Likelihood to Recommend
Claris
If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
Read full review
Traject
Cyfe might be for you if you are looking for a cost-effective way to display all of your marketing metrics in one place. If you are looking for a detailed, fine-tuned, niche, or extremely specific metrics, this might not be the best solution. Cyfe is good for a general health check-up of marketing, but not a finely tuned examination.
Read full review
Pros
Claris
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
Traject
  • Has preset metric groups that pull similar stats together in one "bucket" saving you the time of setting up each stat-line one by one
  • Allows you to easily adjust the timeframe for what stats you want to see, so you can find YOY stats or just last month's stats rather quickly
  • Colored visualizations of stats make it easy to notice when campaigns are taking off
Read full review
Cons
Claris
  • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
  • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
  • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
Read full review
Traject
  • I'd love to see additional functionality to customize colors. The light/dark option is very nice, but a little more flexibility in the colors would go a long way, especially if it was possible at the dashboard level rather than just the account level. Along the same lines, being able to customize the charts a little more, for example being able to show an x-axis on single data type graphs, could make them easier to read in some cases.
  • Being able to choose to report on converted clicks or conversions in AdWords would be helpful.
  • Needs the ability to show the date range on the shared URL dashboards. Would be even better if the date range was adjustable on that view, too.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Claris
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
Traject
It has become a part of our internal tools so unless a competitor comes out with similar functionality as a similar price point it is unlikely that we would not renew. One area that would cause us not to renew would be if a competing service came out with more third-party integrations that match our needs. Price at this point is no longer an issue as it would allow us to automate a somewhat manual process that we have now connecting Cyfe widgets to Google Sheets.
Read full review
Usability
Claris
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
Traject
I gave it a rating of 7 because it does a good job at what it does, but there are missing that are missing which I would have benefited from. For instance, if I was able to drill down more on the specific metrics I was able to see, that would have been helpful.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Claris
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Performance
Claris
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Claris
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
Traject
Because I had a very minor question and I was able to speak directly to the founder through LinkedIn and through email. I know that as they grow this may not always be an option but the fact that he made himself available to answer my questions said a lot about his passion for the product.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Claris
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Claris
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
Traject
Cyfe is a 15 minutes implementation, then some time to get your data sources created. This is an easy one person job that will not result in down time or unnecessary wasted man hours.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Claris
FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
Read full review
Traject
The Salesforce dashboard is comparably flexible and intuitive, but designed more to its internal CRM focus. SumAll shares the social media dashboard capabilities, but lacks all others. Its interesting feature is side-by-side graph analysis for cross-channel performance. Cyfe might borrow from SumAll's default weekly email summary of performance from the dashboard, but implementation could be too complex. Nuvi dashboard is exclusively for social media marketing, but lacks Cyfe's flexibility for third party integration and window customization settings.
Read full review
Scalability
Claris
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
Traject
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Claris
  • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
Read full review
Traject
  • Cyfe allows us to provide real time data to our clients
  • Cyfe allows us to provide detailed analytics to our clients showing actual results
  • Cyfe reduced our need to provide monthly "reports" to our marketing clients
  • Cyfe allows us to have better situational awareness and know what is going on throughout our multiple organizations
Read full review
ScreenShots