Cleverbridge is an enterprise eCommerce solution with subscription management capability to drive growth.
N/A
Zoho Billing
Score7.9 out of 10
N/A
Zoho Billing is a comprehensive billing management solution designed to facilitate one-time invoicing, recurring billing, Subscription Management, and multi-model usage-based billing. The platform automates the entire Quote-to-Cash (Q2C) cycle, ranging from plan configuration to payment collection, revenue recognition, and financial reporting. Zoho Billing functions as a revenue management platform engineered to manage every stage of the Q2C process within a unified…
$25
per month per organization (billed annually)
Pricing
Cleverbridge
Zoho Billing
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$25
per month per organization (billed annually)
Premium
$59
per month per organization (billed annually)
Enterprise Edition
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cleverbridge
Zoho Billing
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cleverbridge
Zoho Billing
Online Storefront
Comparison of Online Storefront features of Cleverbridge and Zoho Billing
Feature
Cleverbridge
7.9
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Zoho Billing
-
Ratings
Product catalog & listings
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk product upload
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Branding
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile storefront
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product variations
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website integration
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual customization
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
CMS
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Shopping Cart
Comparison of Online Shopping Cart features of Cleverbridge and Zoho Billing
Feature
Cleverbridge
8.7
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Zoho Billing
-
Ratings
Abandoned cart recovery
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checkout user experience
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Payment System
Comparison of Online Payment System features of Cleverbridge and Zoho Billing
Feature
Cleverbridge
9.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Zoho Billing
-
Ratings
eCommerce security
9.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
eCommerce Marketing
Comparison of eCommerce Marketing features of Cleverbridge and Zoho Billing
Feature
Cleverbridge
8.2
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Zoho Billing
-
Ratings
Promotions & discounts
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Personalized recommendations
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
eCommerce Business Management
Comparison of eCommerce Business Management features of Cleverbridge and Zoho Billing
Cleverbridge is well-suited for big companies that have a client base and want to start online. If you have a wide range of products, and you sell worldwide--where different languages and different settings are needed for each region--then Cleverbridge is good solution. If you just want to start selling with limited stock and with couple of product types only in one region, then it's not good idea to begin with Cleverbridge.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
[Zoho Subscriptions is great] for startup agencies or businesses that charge monthly subscriptions of some kind. For most other [softwares,] you are paying at least $100 per month just to have the software. Zoho [Subscriptions] gives you the chance to take advantage of starting at [zero dollars,] which keeps your cost down until you understand the software before you have to upgrade. I feel like you can easily bootstrap your startup business to keep costs down. As you [are] moving forward, and are bringing in several thousand per month in revenue, it can scale up without costing a lot. [The subscriptions] [...] [start] to cost more, [...] if you have one time payments; you then need additional software from Zoho [Subscriptions] to handle the needs, and it starts adding up to typical [back- end] management software, with multiple log in points which start to drain your time budget. [At] that point, I ended up looking for a more all in one software that manages both contacts, one time and recurring invoices, reminders, etc. By the time our revenue exceeded [$5,000] per month[,] I [needed] to save time and looked for other options. [However,] I have other friends who still use it and they are generating $10k or more per month.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Declined payments, there wasn't a big alarm that went off automatically when a payment was declined. I have set up different notifications when this happens in the future though.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Usability is native, but the system is complex. It has a knowledge base, but who reads that, right? So without explanation, sometimes it's hard to understand how to move and set things. But as soon as you get it, it's not a problem anymore. There are 2 major things, which keeps me from giving a higher score: 1 - Delay in time when making changes; can take up to 2 sec when opening a product, and 10 secs when saving a product update. When you do several updates, it is time consuming; 2 - A lot of settings, which also in the end becomes time consuming.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Zoho Billing covers our subscription and invoicing needs well and fits nicely into our Zoho setup, but its broken GA4 integration is a real limitation for our use case.
DR Waco e screwed up the company when we worked with them - they didn’t like customers - I know that sounds odd but it was true and their software was dreadful
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Zoho [Subscriptions] is a lot easier to set up recurring payments and notifications than [Stripe] or [PayPal] alone. They offer notification reminders that will help manage clients, versus setting up an API [..] communication system [to] your own with the others. Clients have an easier time changing credit cards around in Zoho [Subscriptions,] whereas in Stripe and Paypal, you have a lot more manual work.
Thryv is [an] all in one [package] for both one time and recurring payments, which I prefer over Zoho [Subscriptions], without having to create new client files in each system; [Thryv] [...] also has notification options which is a time saver. Thryv can also send test email review requests after a trigger or an [invoice] has been paid, whereas you would have to create an API integration with another service to do so in Zoho [Subscriptions]. Overall, Zoho [Subscriptions] is a great system, for most of my personal clients logging into different systems for different needs. [In] addition to subscriptions, [this] is the downfall, but it [is] still a great option for many businesses.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info