ClientSuccess, from the company of the same name in Lehi, is presented by the vendor as a simple yet sophisticated solution for CSMs, and the Executive team. For the CSMs, ClientSuccess brings together the tools, best practices, insights and analytics needed to proactively manage customers. For the Executives, they deliver analytics, metrics and reports to provide a comprehensive view of the health of a SaaS business.
N/A
Landbot
Score7 out of 10
N/A
Landbot.io is a no-code chatbot platform used by businesses to build frictionless conversational experiences from end-to-end. With the goal of turning conversations into profitable outcomes, Landbot helps Marketing, Operations, and Customer Service teams increase their efficiency and cut operating costs. Whether it's for WhatsApp, Web, or Messenger, the user can create automated chatbot flows to better engage customers and…
$39
per month
Pricing
ClientSuccess
Landbot
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Sandbox
$0
Per Month Per User
Starter
$39
per month
Pro
$99
per month
Business
Starting at $300
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClientSuccess
Landbot
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ClientSuccess
Landbot
Security
Comparison of Security features of ClientSuccess and Landbot
Feature
ClientSuccess
8.2
15 Ratings
4% below category average
Landbot
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.215 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of ClientSuccess and Landbot
Feature
ClientSuccess
8.4
13 Ratings
3% below category average
Landbot
-
Ratings
API
10.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Marketo
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with Eloqua
7.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Data Extraction / Integration
Comparison of Customer Data Extraction / Integration features of ClientSuccess and Landbot
Feature
ClientSuccess
8.9
16 Ratings
2% above category average
Landbot
-
Ratings
Product usage
8.414 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk / support tickets
9.412 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Success Management
Comparison of Customer Success Management features of ClientSuccess and Landbot
Feature
ClientSuccess
8.6
17 Ratings
0% above category average
Landbot
-
Ratings
NPS surveys
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sponsor tracking
9.411 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer profiles
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflow
8.917 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal collaboration
7.716 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer health scoring
9.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer segmentation
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CSM Reporting & Analytics features of ClientSuccess and Landbot
Client Success is well suited to both growing and established companies who know what they want and need to track for their clients. With the broad ability to support numerous accounts, have multiple users, and its custom success cycles to map a clients progress, it would be a great solution for any Client Success team. I think that teams that are unaware of what they need to track wouldn't find Client Success as useful, and organizations that require a large number of custom client descriptions and variables would find certain limitations a barrier to successfully using this tool.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Well Suited: If you are looking for a bot - - that is easy to build, that requires no IT person - that has competitive prices - that has a clean and easy reporting option, which can help the data analytics. Not Well Suited: Though it has Dialogflow integration, you cannot use it as a complete self-learning bot solution. If you are looking for a bot that is self-learning you have to go for IBM Watson Assistant/Dialogflow/SAP Conversational AI.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ClientSuccess makes it easy for our customer success managers to manage their workflows and provides excellent visibility into our company's customer activity and engagement. We're able to log into CS and regularly check segments of our customers that need to be engaged with on a daily basis, log customer health, and be aware of approaching subscription renewals in order to pay appropriate attention to the right customers.
The user interface is easy to use, friendly in design, and quick to learn. They make it look attractive with bright color schemes without overdoing it too much.
As a customer success manager myself, I am appreciative of how this tool has kickstarted our fairly-new Customer Success department and made us much more organized and knowledgeable as a customer-facing entity.
Their customer success/support teams are excellent as well - which is to be expected. We've felt very well taken care of since we became customers of ClientSuccess.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The support view takes a few steps to get to the meat and potatoes.
The success score model can be improved to include smaller one-off campaigns. Success score is good for a campaign that has existed for a while but not for the one-off projects.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Keywords Jump Feature: As a feature, it is good. But there is a scope of improvement that I see. In our Business, there are a lot of words that are similar for example Bearing/Bear ring/Bearing. So, at times the bot takes some time to find the exact keyword what the user wants and then route it accordingly. Most of the time, it does right, but at times it doesn't.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
HubSpot is excellent as it was an easy expansion from the sales and marketing work we were using it for. It meets our needs but isn't entirely as geared towards customer success like ClientSuccess. ClientSuccess has more bells and whistles that are out of the box vs. HubSpot, where the capabilities may exist but require a little more leg work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Drift is quite pricey, on the cost part, Landbot was much better with almost similar features. Also, on the UI front, Landbot was a pretty decent tool compared with Drift or MobileMonkey. The usage was easy, the reporting was very easy to get. Considering all these parameters, we chose Landbot for our Organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info