CloudApper CMMS vs. Hippo CMMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudApper CMMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
CMMS is a mobile and cloud application that aims to simplify the management enterprise assets and equipment, maintenance schedules, inventory, work order routing and reporting. The solution helps employees to operate more efficiently and provides management with real-time visibility into the status of their assets and maintenance plans.N/A
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
Pricing
CloudApper CMMSHippo CMMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudApper CMMSHippo CMMS
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$600 Single User
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CloudApper CMMSHippo CMMS
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CloudApper CMMSHippo CMMS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CloudApper CMMSHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(4 ratings)
2.2
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
CloudApper CMMSHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
CloudApper
It's ideal for people who have a smaller budget but want a fully-fledged CMMS solution. Moreover, it's ideal for everyone who is looking for more than a CMMS solution, as the solution provides access to a platform that has other enterprise apps. It might not be ideal for those who want cutting-edge tech such as IoT sensors support, predictive maintenance, etc. Other than such organizations, it's best for everyone else.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Pros
CloudApper
  • Our organization was able to handle tasks and projects linked to maintenance operations with the help of CloudApper CMMS.
  • CloudApper CMMS helped us to reduce operation costs by combining the functions of asset management, maintenance, and inventory management in a single platform.
  • A CMMS built for easier collaboration, project management, and task tracking.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
Cons
CloudApper
  • A few issues need to be ironed out
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CloudApper
As I said, CloudApper CMMS has made our work so simple, it is difficult for us to use any other software. It is so easy to install that any one can be trained without any hassle. The data we receive based on CloudApper CMMS helps us to take certain decisions which are important for us.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CloudApper
No answers on this topic
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CloudApper
The CloudApper CMMS app is highly affordable. I have looked for few apps before I made my final decision to purchase this one. Plus their customer service is excellent. They have helped me unexpectedly during my journey to start with this apps which is very rare to find this days.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CloudApper
  • It has reduced machine downtime significantly
  • It has helped improve the efficiency of the maintenance team
  • It has improved collaboration regarding maintenance
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CloudApper CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of