Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoConstruct
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
CoConstruct, from Buildertrend since the November 2021 acquisition, is a custom builder & remodeler software. It allows users to enter data once and have that information flow through the estimate, specs, selections, bids, proposals, change orders, and budgets, including to and from QuickBooks. In addition, CoConstruct includes scheduling and 3-way communication between builder, client, and trade partners. Everything is captured via email and texting. Login isn't required for…
$49
per month
MetaMeetings
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$4,000
one-time fee
monday.com
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
monday.com Work OS is an open platform designed so that anyone can create the tools they need to run all aspects of their work. It includes ready-made templates or the ability to customize any work solution ranging from sales pipelines to marketing campaigns, CRMs, and project tracking.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Editions & Modules
Ramp
$49
per month
Plus 5
$299
per month
Plus 10
$399
per month
Plus 15
$499
per month
Basic
$4,000
one-time fee
Basic
$12
per month per user
Standard
$14
per month per user
Pro
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Contact us
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsCoConstruct pricing is based on active job sites that have client access online, which means it is adaptable to builders & remodelers businesses. This means that there are an unlimited amount of projects available for estimates and proposals, so that customers only pay when they win a contract. Also built into the pricing are a myriad of services: a dedicated implementation coach, free estimate & scheduling templates based on industry best practices from successful builders and the NAHB, unlimited storage and users, software branded with the customer's logo, unlimited amount of warranty projects, and unlimited phone & email support. The vendor offers a money-back guarantee that is good for the first 90 days of service.An 18% discount is available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Considered Multiple Products
CoConstruct
Chose CoConstruct
CoConstruct has a lot of similar functionality as comopared to BuilderTrend and when it came down to selecting one over the other, CoConstruct won our business because of this fact. The fact that it does almost all of the same things at a fraction of the cost of BuilderTrend …
Chose CoConstruct
Products like Procore and PlanGrid are geared towards projects with huge projects teams, multiple stakeholders and dozens of subcontractors. CoConstruct can be used for projects big and small (value) and also with small project teams or large projects teams. For small partial …
Chose CoConstruct
We utilize CoConstruct because it doesn't forget the close relationship with a client. Other software performs well in project management, but so often they epitomize the adversarial relationship in construction between the contractor and the client. CoConstruct tries to put …
Chose CoConstruct
We used Basecamp for two years in conjunction with CoConstruct, to make up for the team communication CoConstruct lacks. Basecamp was excellent for that purpose. We also used it to get quick, simple approvals for change orders, because CoConstruct did not have a simple method …
Chose CoConstruct
BuilderTrend provides a similar product; however, I found it a little more clunky to use. BuilderTrend integrates with a third party estimating software; however, it wasn't one I used. I had already invested in an estimating system that I could manipulate better to support …
Chose CoConstruct
I have looked at Builder Trend. It has a similar function and does many of the same things. Generally, I prefer the look and feel of CoConstruct, It has a cleaner and more approachable interface. Its ability to integrate with outside accounting software, specifically …
Chose CoConstruct
CoConstruct was chosen mostly because the competition didn't have much differentiation, and another colleague referred coConstruct.
Chose CoConstruct
  • CoConstruct has no CRM or ability to search the system for information, and the team collaboration and tasks either don't work or don't work well across the board.
  • For the things that CoConstruct does, it does well, but the things it lacks in it might as well not do at all.
Chose CoConstruct
We have tried all the major products and some minor ones too.

Don't pick BuilderTrend. We spent a year with them and discovered that they release beta-quality features. We signed on to their payment system, and it cost us so much time and energy to sort out the mess that it …
Chose CoConstruct
CoConstruct is the only single-entry estimating system that allows each user to enter a piece of information once, and have that data flow directly from the estimate, specifications, selections, bids, change orders, budgets, and to and from QuickBooks with no double entry! It …
MetaMeetings

No answer on this topic

monday.com
Chose monday.com
monday.com feels like it offers a lower barrier to entry as well as more versatility, extensibility without becoming too complex. Atlassian is geared more for larger companies requiring a greater degree of granular controls.

Both platforms have a number of integrations (though, …
Chose monday.com
I used Pipedrive in my previous roles, so I did not evaluate monday.com as an alternative to Pipedrive. Similarly, Salesforce is not positioned as an alternative to monday.com for us. We currently use both Salesforce and monday.com, as they serve different purposes and …
Chose monday.com
monday.com does more than just a single function like other tools.
Chose monday.com
Planner is very hard to figure out. Insightly is a good resource to keeping track of customers and their info but for tasks, monday.com is far superior
Chose monday.com
Workfront offered a more intuitive user interface, which made team adoption easier. It also included additional products that aligned well with the needs of our Dev, Work Management, and Service teams.
Chose monday.com
Atlassian Jira, Jira Service Management and Jira Work Management
Chose monday.com
I actually found clickup easier to use and they had better features for recurring tasks
Chose monday.com
Cost is a big factor as the alternatives stacked up poorly in user costs and built in features. Also, the business was already using a different facet of monday.com so it was a quick setup and we already had experience and people were Jo knew the platform. Less complex and also …
Chose monday.com
monday is more capable and comprehensive when it comes to project and task management as well as the CRM side. However, Odoo is better suited for managing other areas that monday doesn’t cover, such as employee management, payroll, and invoicing. If one were to prioritize cost …
Chose monday.com
Very similar feature-function-wise wise but the UI is the ultimate differentiator that makes adoption so much easier on monday.com.
Chose monday.com
We have not used anything like Monday.com before. We used to do all of what I described on Google Sheets and share them with the company. It was very time consuming and cumbersome to remake new sheets every year, Monday.com gives us the freedom to add on year by year and not …
Chose monday.com
monday.com is far superior to Microsoft Planner and Basecamp, and arguably superior to Trello and Slack Lists as well. Asana (for work management and Zendesk (for request management) put it to shame. My main monday-using client selected it primarily because of its slightly …
Chose monday.com
We have only ever tried one other software that was designed to work similarly to monday.com. I will not name the company but our experience with it was just short of harrowing. The company was friendly and supportive but the product they designed was not user friendly. It did …
Chose monday.com
monday.com is the sweet spot of rich feature set and simplicity
Chose monday.com
I think trello was nice so self-use, but not for a team
Chose monday.com
monday.com is so much better and cheaper. We moved from Zendesk because, in our experience, their customer service was terrible, they kept raising prices, and there was limited functionality relevant to our organization. The tools within monday.com allow us to use it as more …
Chose monday.com
It's been a while since trying Asana, so it's hard to say. I think they are very similar from what I remember, but maybe monday.com has more reporting and customization possibilities?
Chose monday.com
monday.com offer much of the standard tools and seems to be ever evolving. They seem to take feedback and constantly upgrade the tools. If all the tools are there, the differentiating factor might be the cost, any integrations you may need, and the visual "chemistry". To me, …
Chose monday.com
We chose to move from Zoho to monday.com when our company started growing exponentially. Overall, our team was thankful for the change because we were growing at far to fast of a speed for Zoho's tools to keep up with us. monday.com is a better, beefier platform with far better …
Chose monday.com
We decided to go with monday.com because they offered a free tier for nonprofits and because they are easier to use and offered additional features that we could not find on the other choices. Hands down, there was no better choice for us than monday.com.
Chose monday.com
When I arrived at my org, I was initially disappointed to hear that we used something other than Asana for project management. Fast forward just a few months, and I became a complete monday.com convert. While its organization is similar to Asana's, it's user interface, …
Chose monday.com
We use Jira, Confluence, Miro and the full Salesforce stack and it's very reliable as are the other softwares.
Features
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
MetaMeetings
-
Ratings
monday.com
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
MetaMeetings
-
Ratings
monday.com
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Small Businesses
Procore
Procore
Score 8.6 out of 10
Whova
Whova
Score 9.5 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Procore
Procore
Score 8.6 out of 10
Whova
Whova
Score 9.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Aconex
Oracle Aconex
Score 7.0 out of 10
Whova
Whova
Score 9.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoConstructMetaMeetingsmonday.com
Likelihood to Recommend
CoConstruct is a great program for small to mid-size residential and commercial projects. It still has a ways to go with subcontractor engagement but the groundwork is there for this to be a good program. The needs and requirements for a residential or remodel project always are different and unique, but CoConstruct is very well suited to address these needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
The platform is very well suited for our nonprofit programs that serve low-income clients who need diapers, wipes, and period products. It has helped us run our programs, capturing information and allowing us to view the data for reporting purposes. The ability to filter data is very helpful by allowing us to categorize information to get a better picture of the progress of our programs.
Read full review
Pros
  • The integration of all aspects needed to run a remodeling company efficiently: project scheduling and management, financial planning and customer service. Since it’s an all-in-one suite and cloud-based, it enables our team to keep track of all our projects in real-time. Communication breakdown is the last thing we want, so being on the same page is not only desirable but makes for the best possible relationship with our clients.
  • Product education - We like how CoConstruct helps new users and get them to start using the tool right away. The dashboard resource materials are incredibly useful. We don’t have to spend a lot of time training new hires on the system and onboarding new clients.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • I like summary of subitems, especially with subitasks as subitems and add item tracking for each subtask it can show total tracked in parent item. Similar with other columns, like numbers, status, date.
  • Dashboard features, Many kinds of dashboard view available, we can utilize on the basis of requirements.
  • monday.com workform is very powerful, easily share form link when submitted it will create line item in board with provided data.
  • monday.com automation is very helpful in order to automate steps with specific rules and easy setup.
  • monday.com also provides integrations in order to automate processes if need to integrate multiple app together. or need to transfer data between multiple apps.
Read full review
Cons
  • Estimating is still done on third party software and pulled into the program. If you do manual takeoffs and work on a spreadsheet, this is relatively simple to do - and you could probably enter it straight into Co-Construct. However, if you use automatic takeoffs for accuracy and speed, you will end up doing a bit of double handling as you re-enter the output into Co-Construct. Ideally, you would be able to do the takeoffs within the program, entering the data only once.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • The desktop app for Mac seems to have a few issues with visual glitches appearing on screen, it only seems to go away when I close the tool and reopen it
  • Subtasks don't show on the individual users to-do list, only main level tasks
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Teams involved in content creation, such as marketing or editorial teams, could use monday.com to manage the entire content lifecycle. Boards might track content ideas, assignments, drafts, reviews, approvals, and publication schedules, helping teams collaborate and keep content production on track.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It's really about ease of use. I use Click-Up as well, which I really enjoy, but monday.com is a lot less complex to use. Its structure is a bit easier to understand and I got accustomed to the functionality very quickly. I have not explored enough of its functionality to comment any further but it's a really great tool for tracking progress and for capturing absolutely everything I need to save, including ideas, brain-dump, insights, continuous improvement on tasks and processes. I am lucky to be able to use monday.com as a member of my client's team.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
There have only been 2 instances in the past year where monday.com was down.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Everything performs fairly well. Every now and then there are user errors where an employee will not click "ok" on a note they've created and simply exit out (I do wish that something was in place to prevent this, such as a pop "are you finished?")
Read full review
Support Rating
  • The customer support for CoConstruct is hands down the best I have ever experienced from a software company. Any time I send a support request through the help center, my questions are either acknowledged or answered and solved within 20-30 minutes. For more complicated items, they will keep in touch with me as the team works through the problem.
  • I often offer enhancement requests which they take seriously, and over the years, some of the changes that I have wanted to see have been implemented.
  • Excellent customer service!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
monday.com only really care about accounts that have 20 seats or more. While this is great for monday.com, it pushes smaller organisations to evaluate alternatives. We rate monday.com highly in our organisation because key staff have already got good experience with the application and we know we will get to 20+ seats one day. But, till then the billing model and lack of permanent enterprise features is a dread.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
To have someone walk you thru the features and capabilities of Monday.com is priceless. Someone also coming along later in the contract to see if you are maximizing the program to suit your company needs is beyond helpful. The staff that have provided this training are fun, creative and very patient.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
We signed up for the accounts. Created the accounts. Ran the trial version and tested it live while we were running multiple projects and found that it was fitting our needs perfectly. When the trial ended and we were asked to purchase the full version, we did. We have found other ways to use it and it's a breeze.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CoConstruct has a lot of similar functionality as comopared to Buildertrend and when it came down to selecting one over the other, CoConstruct won our business because of this fact. The fact that it does almost all of the same things at a fraction of the cost of Buildertrend was ultimately the reason why we selected CoConstruct for our business needs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
monday.com feels like it offers a lower barrier to entry as well as more versatility, extensibility without becoming too complex. Atlassian is geared more for larger companies requiring a greater degree of granular controls. Both platforms have a number of integrations (though, Atlassian may have "more" because of it's marketplace and longer tenure), but monday.com may be easier to configure, though with potentially more limited functionality. monday.com definitely lends itself well to getting a business off the ground with simpler automations and the ability to grow you to the point of "graduating" to a more specialized tools.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
For it to work across multiple departments and sites, I would like to see improvements made with integrations and automation. For this question, I am acknowledging not only the addition of internal triggers/automation, but also an expansion on external ones.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • CoConstruct has reduced our time spent estimating.
  • CoConstruct has increased profitability by capturing communication details and preventing important items from being overlooked.
  • CoConstruct has led to more referrals, as customers are pleased with the software and the way it helps them stay informed about their project.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
  • By using monday.com as an enablement tool for templated onboarding plans, we have been able to begin calculating the number of manager hours saved through our work (not defined yet).
  • monday.com's reporting tools also allow us to more easily report on the productivity and output of our team since we keep up with all projects and subitems in monday.com.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CoConstruct Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

monday.com Screenshots

Screenshot of Work OSScreenshot of Ready-Made TemplatesScreenshot of MobileScreenshot of Visual BoardsScreenshot of Real-time NotificationsScreenshot of Automations