Cofense Triage vs. Huntress

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cofense Triage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Cofense Triage accelerates phishing qualification, investigation, and response by automating standard responses to suspicious emails to make analysts more efficient and driving out actionable intelligence, and providing incident response playbook.N/A
Huntress
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Huntress is a security platform that surfaces hidden threats, vulnerabilities, and exploits. The platform helps IT resellers protect their customers from persistent footholds, ransomware and other attacks.N/A
Pricing
Cofense TriageHuntress
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cofense TriageHuntress
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cofense TriageHuntress
Features
Cofense TriageHuntress
Incident Response Platforms
Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
Cofense Triage
6.4
35 Ratings
33% below category average
Huntress
-
Ratings
Integration with Other Security Systems5.034 Ratings00 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization6.127 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard7.735 Ratings00 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation6.731 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cofense TriageHuntress
Small Businesses
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 9.5 out of 10
ESET PROTECT
ESET PROTECT
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cofense TriageHuntress
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(38 ratings)
9.2
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.5
(5 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cofense TriageHuntress
Likelihood to Recommend
Cofense
The tool is very helpful in improving Phishing detection capabilities as it streamlines the process of analyzing user reports a lot. Besides it has a built-in mechanism of rating reporters(end-users) based on their historical performance. Downside - tool requires continuous resource investment to deliver best result. Tool is not helping too much in improving user-education, because automated response process is not immediate and is prone to errors
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
Huntress is great for a managed service provider to provide a better cybersecurity stack to their endpoints/customers. Some smaller clients cannot afford high-priced SOC services but require SOC-level protection. Along with a couple of other layers of security, Huntress provides peace of mind for the MSP that if a threat were to arise, they would be notified with specific instructions for dealing with that threat.
Read full review
Pros
Cofense
  • Separating links and attachments contained in the email, and checking to see if they are known malicious.
  • Clustering like emails to save time when responding.
  • Providing risks scores with each cluster to give an estimate on which clusters should be addressed first.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
  • Using the latest industry knowledge of threats that have been ongoing, but not previously known and projecting it back in time against their installed endpoints to identify machines that are vulnerable or breached and when it these events occurred
  • Very quiet. If they alert, it is a thing.
  • Very good at remediation.
  • They communicate extremely well when it matters.
  • While there are the most extensive products more often than not they are the first to alert us to a threat.
Read full review
Cons
Cofense
  • There are too many interdependent pieces which you have to acquire separately.
  • I think Cofense has a lot of capabilities and usefulness, but I think it's too a la carte.
  • We own Cofense and PhishMe currently and there are some gaping holes that require additional licensing to close.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
  • Now that they have EDR capability, they need to fully participate in MITRE testing for direct comparison against other EDR products.
  • Now that they are going into Managed Antivirus and EDR with isolation capabilities they need to update their SLA comparative to other vendors
  • Support for non-Windows OSes for consistency in a network
  • It would be nice to seed canary files in custom shares on servers.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cofense
Cofense is stable and provides easy to use solution to aid the investigation of emails as well as managing simulated phishing campaigns.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cofense
The interface is easy and intuitive.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
We dropped SentinelOne in favor of Huntress because the UI was much more simplistic for the tier 1 techs to maintain. It beats the old web design model of three clicks to where you want to go. It is very intuitive. No one needs training to figure out how to navigate its console.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cofense
We've experienced zero downtime.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
No answers on this topic
Performance
Cofense
No slowness seen.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Cofense
Training was through, relevant and easy to follow.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cofense
The other product had a lot of fails on the auto-processing and did not integrate well with our current environment. One issue had to do with the way it sends the submissions to its processing engine—our email gateway configuration would have blocked this traffic. I also did not like the user interface.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
Firstly from a business model, [VMware] Carbon Black [Cloud Managed Detection] was not outfitted for the MSP where Huntress is very MSP-friendly from an affordably easy point to entry to value for money licensing. Carbon Black TS is not bad in anyway, well, that we found, but Huntress is a new layer of security that fits between the OS and AV layers to provide additional information, monitoring, and detection. With Huntress backing the MSP, [it] sure does help as well.
Read full review
Scalability
Cofense
We've experienced zero downtime
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cofense
  • Due to the integration potential, large amounts of time are saved on a daily basis.
  • Incident response time has dropped due to the increased information available by having access to phishing emails directly.
  • Staff are able to effectively learn how multiple tools in our environment are used by mastering Triage. This has decreased training time greatly and increased the effectiveness of each associate.
Read full review
Huntress Labs Incorporated
  • We have been able to lower operational costs by shifting to Huntress.
  • We've been able to cut costs to our clients by utilizing Huntress over competing products.
  • In spite of inflation, we've been able to keep our managed service prices at a steady, below market rate, because of Huntress.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cofense Triage Screenshots

Screenshot of Triage DashboardScreenshot of Triage Dashboard Cluster DetailsScreenshot of Triage Cluster DetailsScreenshot of Triage Cluster Malicious AttachmentScreenshot of Triage Cluster HeadersScreenshot of Triage Reporter Details