Formerly Oracle Content Marketing of the Oracle Marketing Cloud, Compendium was a content marketing solution to create and distribute compelling content across multiple channels to a targeted audience. Users could plan, produce, and deliver content across multiple personas and channels throughout the customer life cycle.
Oracle acquired the product in 2013. A legacy product, Compendium is now end of sale.
N/A
Flowdock
Score9.5 out of 10
N/A
Flowdock is a collaboration tool built around a chat and team inbox interface. Flowdock is available via app or as a browser-based solution.
It was originally offered by Rally Software Development, which was acquired by CA Technologies, which was acquired by Broadcom in 2018.
N/A
Pricing
Compendium (discontinued)
Flowdock
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Compendium (discontinued)
Flowdock
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Compendium (discontinued)
Flowdock
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Compendium (discontinued) and Flowdock
Feature
Compendium (discontinued)
7.2
6 Ratings
8% below category average
Flowdock
-
Ratings
Ideation
6.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval workflows
9.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content collaboration
7.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content calendar
7.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production
5.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Compendium (discontinued) and Flowdock
Feature
Compendium (discontinued)
6.6
6 Ratings
17% below category average
Flowdock
-
Ratings
Content hub
6.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content
6.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
7.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content distribution
7.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
6.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
6.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Compendium (discontinued) and Flowdock
Feature
Compendium (discontinued)
6.6
6 Ratings
11% below category average
Flowdock
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting
6.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting
6.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content performance analytics
8.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard
6.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Competitive analytics
6.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Compendium (discontinued) and Flowdock
Feature
Compendium (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Flowdock
4.9
2 Ratings
45% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
6.72 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
7.22 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
5.72 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Compendium (discontinued) and Flowdock
Feature
Compendium (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Flowdock
3.8
2 Ratings
71% below category average
Chat
00 Ratings
8.92 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Compendium (discontinued) and Flowdock
Oracle is great for a very basic blog. The look of ours was designed and built on the back end/code side, so I'm not sure if there are a lot of clean, modern templates like you see in a lot of blogs today to choose from or not. It has been great having a number of authors who can write content directly in the platform and then submit it to our content managers for scheduling and publishing. I think the biggest issue people may have with it is the look of the interface. It needs an update.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Flowdock is well suited for small teams and to environments that doesn't need too much reliability. I think it has some management problems that can make your life difficult if you have to manage a big amount of users. If you want just a tool communication with basic features (without using any integration or robust features) it can be suitable for you. You should try Flowdock using its free version for a small team and compare with others similar products. Flowdock delivers team chat and collaboration features, but is not necessarily the best product. Maybe some usability problems that disturb me won't be so relevant to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Templates are a good thing, but hard to set up and require a lot of work. (Other Oracle tools are more user-friendly when it comes to template design.)
While they did a good job updating the interface, I still believe more work can be done to make it more user-friendly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One thing a little bit annoying is that a lot of links to others Flowdock sections (preferences, external services, etc) will open a new window/tab. Each click may take you to a new window and you can get lost easily.
There isn't a quick access list to members of your organization to start a private chat. I took a while to find how to do that. The interface and usability could be better.
There isn't an app for Windows Phone.
Sometimes you try to load some conversation and it doesn't show anything. It is not frequently but happens sometimes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Easy to use, and supporting several permutations, the CM suite is an excellent solution for a mid to large size business. It's meant to be used by a team, and the functionality can work across websites and landing pages. There's also the high benefit of translation management, providing support for localized products.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
I go with the flow because I'm a newer employee and Flowdock works as advertised. If it were my decision to choose a team communciator for the organization, I'd recommend we go with Slack for its robust features and ever-changing/evolving software integrations. Slack is the outright innovator in the space and will continue to hold that role for some time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
To be perfectly honest, every one of my concerns and problems has been handled by the support team in a very timely manner. If they could not fix my issue they assured me it be addressed in future updates.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Don't forget about customer service once you have a closed the sale with a customer. Oracle seemed to not care about our needs/timeline after we gave them our Purchase Order
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
While OCM was a lot more money, they were able to prove to us that they are a much better solution to use and worth the extra cost. The reporting, capabilities along with the analytics that was easy to download was a big discussion factor for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Private chat or channels are well implemented in both softwares and both are also very easy to setup.
Besides of some usability problemas I think Flowdock is still better than Slack in this user experience and design.
The second point is the price. Flowdock is half price of Slack ($3/month). If you are a student or a non-profit organization, you are able to get some special license.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Everyone had their own plan and executed them without taking into consideration the impact of another ongoing project. Compendium has created communication between teams that were not communicating before.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info