Confluent vs. Pipedrive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluent
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.
$385
per month
Pipedrive
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Pipedrive is a customer relationship management (CRM) software built to help small teams to drive sales.
$24
per month per seat
Pricing
ConfluentPipedrive
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
Standard
Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise
Starting at ~$1,150
per month
Essential
$24
per month per seat
Advanced
$49
per month per seat
Professional
$69
per month per seat
Power
$79
per month per seat
Enterprise
$129
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluentPipedrive
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsConfluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).Monthly plans are available. The Essentials monthly plan at $24 per month.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ConfluentPipedrive
Features
ConfluentPipedrive
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
9.1
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Pipedrive
-
Ratings
Real-Time Data Analysis10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Low Latency9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Enrichment10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
7.9
68 Ratings
1% above category average
Customer data management / contact management00 Ratings8.724 Ratings
Workflow management00 Ratings7.721 Ratings
Territory management00 Ratings6.514 Ratings
Opportunity management00 Ratings8.365 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)00 Ratings8.764 Ratings
Contract management00 Ratings8.217 Ratings
Quote & order management00 Ratings7.214 Ratings
Interaction tracking00 Ratings8.521 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management00 Ratings7.116 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
2.9
7 Ratings
90% below category average
Case management00 Ratings4.76 Ratings
Call center management00 Ratings1.15 Ratings
Help desk management00 Ratings3.16 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
7.5
49 Ratings
4% below category average
Lead management00 Ratings7.449 Ratings
Email marketing00 Ratings7.513 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
6.7
67 Ratings
14% below category average
Task management00 Ratings7.964 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management00 Ratings4.15 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings8.163 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
7.7
68 Ratings
0% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.619 Ratings
Pipeline visualization00 Ratings8.268 Ratings
Customizable reports00 Ratings7.516 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
6.3
64 Ratings
20% below category average
Custom fields00 Ratings8.464 Ratings
Custom objects00 Ratings8.454 Ratings
Scripting environment00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
API for custom integration00 Ratings7.646 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
6.7
62 Ratings
23% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings6.112 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings7.260 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
1.1
5 Ratings
149% below category average
Social data00 Ratings1.15 Ratings
Social engagement00 Ratings1.15 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
3.6
7 Ratings
70% below category average
Marketing automation00 Ratings3.67 Ratings
Compensation management00 Ratings3.54 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Product A and Product B
Confluent
-
Ratings
Pipedrive
8.2
61 Ratings
8% above category average
Mobile access00 Ratings8.261 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ConfluentPipedrive
Small Businesses
IBM Streams (discontinued)
IBM Streams (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Salesmate
Salesmate
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.4 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 5.2 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ConfluentPipedrive
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(71 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(25 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.5
(15 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ConfluentPipedrive
Likelihood to Recommend
Confluent
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
Pipedrive is a fantastic tool to help monitor and track lead generation and referral sources. It helps maintain accountability with the sales team and helps ensure that we are doing appropriate marketing to maintain a steady influx of cases. The weekly and quarterly sales reports that it can generate are incredibly helpful and insightful. They help inform us of what we need to focus on each quarter/year.
Read full review
Pros
Confluent
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
  • Great visual visibility of the funnel plus easy to drag the deals across the stages
  • The email integration that collects all relevant communication (also through the possibility of adding a deal-specific Pipedrive address on BCC)
  • The integration with Pandadoc, which we use a lot, so that Pipedrive keeps a really handy overview of the documents we have sent out / which have been signed
Read full review
Cons
Confluent
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
  • Showing the customers name on the pipeline page. Right now I can only get it to show the brand name twice. I wish it would replace the second brand name with the main point of contact.
  • Better reporting tools. Their reporting tools are not easy to pick up. I've spent time trying to figure it out and it isn't something I can pick up on quickly.
  • Better training options. I wish I had a personal trainer to walk me through the best way to use Pipedrive so I can get the most out of it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Confluent
No answers on this topic
Pipedrive Inc.
-2 for Its cost and +8 for the need of tracking of leads and monitoring of team.
Read full review
Usability
Confluent
No answers on this topic
Pipedrive Inc.
Pipedrive is easy to use and has a clean interface so we can follow up accurately. Its custom features help manage leads and evaluate team performance. It saves time and improves efficiency. Pipedrive is stable and supports integrations and automation.
Read full review
Support Rating
Confluent
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
Between quick video tutorials and having very quick feedback from their support teams, it is one of the main reasons I would recommend Pipedrive. It is critical, especially when setting up the platform to meet your companies needs, that a solid support team like Pipedrive has is there to make the transition easier.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Confluent
No answers on this topic
Pipedrive Inc.
Experiment is the only way to start
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Confluent
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
I much prefer the interface of Pipedive when compared to Zoho. Much more user friendly and the team is always readily available when we need them. Pipedrive allowed for many custom integrations to be added, as Zoho was a tad more complicated to manipulate. We would not go back to Zoho in any case.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Confluent
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Read full review
Pipedrive Inc.
  • Great on setup which made our work easier and less technically equipped people can manage a lot of things(compared to SalesForce where you need to hire a developer to set it up)
  • We were able to integrate our calling system easily and get things going on the lead calling aspect.
  • Great multipipeline option where we were able to manage both organisations under one roof.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Pipedrive Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of