TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Contentful

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AContentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their choice.

    $0

    eDOCS

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AOpenText eDOCS is presented as a light-footprint, cost-effective and highly-flexible enterprise content management (ECM) solution for Legal, Corporate Legal, Public Sector and Professional Service organizations and corporate law departments. eDOCS aims to ensure sensitive work product is securely managed throughout the content lifecycle, while remaining easily accessible for day-to-day operations, to enable users to deliver exceptional enterprise content services to their clients.N/A
    Pricing
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Editions & Modules
    Lite
    $300
    per month
    Community
    Free
    Enterprise
    Custom
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Considered Both Products
    Contentful
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Contentful and eDOCS
    Feature
    Contentful
    8.5
    10 Ratings
    3% above category average
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    Role-based user permissions8.510 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Contentful and eDOCS
    Feature
    Contentful
    9.5
    12 Ratings
    20% above category average
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    API9.311 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language9.79 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Contentful and eDOCS
    Feature
    Contentful
    7.8
    13 Ratings
    1% below category average
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    WYSIWYG editor7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness9.58 Ratings00 Ratings
    Admin section9.311 Ratings00 Ratings
    Page templates7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Library of website themes7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design4.57 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publishing workflow9.312 Ratings00 Ratings
    Form generator7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Contentful and eDOCS
    Feature
    Contentful
    9.4
    12 Ratings
    22% above category average
    eDOCS
    -
    Ratings
    Content taxonomy10.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    SEO support10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bulk management9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions9.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Community / comment management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Contentful and eDOCS
    Feature
    Contentful
    -
    Ratings
    eDOCS
    8.6
    7 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Content capture & imaging00 Ratings8.85 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
    Document management00 Ratings9.27 Ratings
    Records management00 Ratings9.17 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval00 Ratings9.17 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings8.26 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings8.66 Ratings
    Automated workflows00 Ratings8.17 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
    Mobile support00 Ratings8.67 Ratings
    Integration00 Ratings8.87 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Small Businesses
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (13 ratings)
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ContentfuleDOCS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Contentful
    It's a great all rounder for content projects. It's easy in the basics and powerful in the complex, data heavy scenarios. Extending the platform is straightforward and the SDK gives you everything you need. If you have many many varying content types , it gets expensive and perhaps not the best choice .
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    My team and I have benefited positively from the work of this platform. Our content and any data that is created during the project implementation process are securely stored in a safe storage space. Documents are arranged well to enhance faster identification during the time of reference. It provides cloud-based based backup support to minimize file losses. It is best suited to the electronic data management suite.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Contentful
    • Flexible. This CMS can be easily extended and provide access to dynamic content
    • Simple. The WYSWG is very easy to work with and identifying pages and content in the system is fairly easy
    • Clean Interface. The interface is clean and uncluttered keeping focus on the content and not other factors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Secure.
    • Accessibility.
    • User experience.
    • Ease of use.
    • One stop solution for all types of file/data storage.
    • Can be accessed via mobile, tablet, laptops.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Contentful
    • Contentful uses "references" to allow you to build very modular content. If I have a "slider" content type, I can create a "slide" content type which references a "button" content type, and so forth. This works well, but I occasionally wish there was a better solution for one-off content, like a settings page. Currently, this is done for creating an entire content type called "settings" with a single entry. Not a big deal, but not ideal, either.
    • There are a few quirks with GatsbyJS integration, etc, but these issues are being fixed and improved upon very quickly.
    • A minor gripe, but Contentful does not have a way to organize fields within an entry. Entries with many fields are somewhat tiresome to scroll through.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Their learning services could improve
    • The cloud management isn't the best in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Contentful
    It is a very easy to use and configure application. I find that it is on the user to manage the content after the models have been created, yet I still do not encounter issues finding or creating new components for our site. It is easy to set up and easy to navigate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Contentful
    Easy to use and much more organized as a single platform versus multi. The layout is clean and easy to read and we don’t have to worry about certain users safe guarding data or content then losing it when they leave the company. It’s a one stop shop for imagery
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Microsoft SharePoint is a simpler alternative for OpenText eDOCS. It can be used for the same objectives, i.e. to share and manage content, search for information, and collaborate across business areas. Integration with other applications and platforms can be rather limited, in comparison to OpenText eDOCS, but the interface can be considered cleaner than the one of OpenText.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Contentful
    • Contentful has saved us valuable development time that was previously spent doing deploys for minor content updates.
    • Contentful has helped us maintain consistent documentation, reducing time needed to review for consistency.
    • Can't say we've really experienced any negative ROI impacts from using Contentful, but we've run into some limitations in adding too many content models and the next pricing tier is substantially more expensive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Pros: providing secure application so that we do not worry about security perspective much.
    • Pros : Ease of use.
    • Pros : Accessible via mobile, tablets, cloud, laptops.
    • Cons: Complex.
    • Cons : Pricing can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Contentful Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot