Contentsquare, now with Hotjar vs. Solid User Tests
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Contentsquare | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | Contentsquare is an enterprise experience intelligence and Digital Analytics platform designed to track, visualize, and optimize user journeys across websites and mobile applications. The platform captures digital interaction telemetry—such as clicks, scrolls, hovers, and page drop-offs—without manual event tagging to power Web Analytics, session replays, funnel visualization, and experience monitoring. | N/A |
Solid User Tests | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Solid is a user testing solution featuring Anna, a virtual avatar, that moderates tests for the user. Solid allows researchers to run tests where testers don't behave unnaturally. They are not told to read scripts or think aloud in unusual sequences. This hurts their testing experience. Instead, Solid gives them space to go at their own pace, and to think aloud only when they become silent. Solid enables users to test prototypes, websites and native apps, or anything as long as a… | $252 one-time fee per study |
| Contentsquare | Solid User Tests | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Solid offers two different payment plans: - per study: one-time fee - per user: monthly or yearly fee A per-user payment plan is scalable for up to 6 researchers (editors) | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Contentsquare | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 53 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 50 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 53 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 44 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 42 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Contentsquare | Solid User Tests | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Capabilities |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results and Analysis |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contentsquare | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Fullstory Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Quantum Metric Score7.5 out of 10 | Dovetail Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Glassbox Score6.4 out of 10 | Optimal Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Contentsquare | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.1 | - |
| Usability | 9.5 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Contentsquare | Solid User Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Solid User Tests Screenshots |








