Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.
N/A
CoreMedia
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
CoreMedia is a composable DXP with a hybrid headless CMS that unifies content, data and AI to deliver personalized omnichannel experiences. It supports real-time optimization, automation, localization and flexible deployment, enhancing efficiency across marketing, content and customer interactions.
N/A
Pricing
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Features
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.5
11 Ratings
9% below category average
CoreMedia
5.0
2 Ratings
49% below category average
Role-based user permissions
7.511 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.6
10 Ratings
2% below category average
CoreMedia
7.0
1 Ratings
17% below category average
API
8.19 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
7.28 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.1
12 Ratings
4% above category average
CoreMedia
7.2
2 Ratings
5% below category average
WYSIWYG editor
8.12 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Admin section
7.712 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Page templates
7.68 Ratings
4.52 Ratings
Library of website themes
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
6.69 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Publishing workflow
7.010 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
6.4
12 Ratings
15% below category average
CoreMedia
6.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Content taxonomy
7.210 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
SEO support
6.510 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Bulk management
5.99 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
6.58 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Community / comment management
6.06 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contentstack
CoreMedia
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
I think this CMS is best suited as an enterprise level system. For small, or simple sites, there are better options, but for large high-traffic sites, this is a great CMS.
Allows many staff members to contribute content to various portions of our website, and allows our Electronic-Communications staff to delegate tasks to these various staff (diffusing the work-load).
CoreMedia allows for easy creation of different types of content (like teasers, articles, download objects, links, etc). Permission levels can be set, so only certain staff can upload content such as photos, videos, or audio files.
The CoreMedia workflow process is easy to understand and follow. Once a staff member has submitted content for publishing to the web, they can then see who it's been assigned to for review, and at what time. You're able to leave detailed notes and stay abreast of where the workflow is at any given time.
In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
CoreMedia continues to refine and deliver new features. They also explore new technologies and trends, like social media integration. The platform is solid and growing. We are also slightly locked into using CoreMedia. Migrating such a large amount of content to another system would likely not be feasible or prudent.
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
While CoreMedia has a better workflow, django CMS has a much easier user interface, wysiwyg editor, and is superior on every other level. Django CMS is easier to teach and support, easier to manage and develop, and provides much more flexibility in the development and design areas.