Contentstack vs. dotCMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentstack
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.N/A
dotCMS
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
dotCMS is a Java open-source content management system for companies that demand performance in web operations and content management. With dotCMS, companies can create value and deliver dynamic user experiences across multiple channels. The solution is built on open standards: JSON, XML, REST, Spring, OSGI and CMIS. The vendor says it is extensible and massively scalable, and can help companies rapidly deliver personalized, engaging content across devices, channels, second screens…
$0
Pricing
ContentstackdotCMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Community
$0
Standard
$0
Professional
$0
Prime
$0
Standard
$0
Professional
$0
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentstackdotCMS
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsPricing is per server. One server equals one JVM. There is no limit on users, seats, or web sites.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentstackdotCMS
Considered Both Products
Contentstack
Chose Contentstack
Contentstack is very user-friendly and modern.
Chose Contentstack
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that …
Chose Contentstack
When we wanted to move to headless we took a look and tested some of the offerings available for headless CMS. Many do have similar features and services and so for us it came down to how Contentstack built a business relationship and service around their clients. We were given …
Chose Contentstack
Featurewise, there's not a lot that separates these CMSs, and it's hard to assess in a SW selection phase exactly how the products stack up against each other. Ultimately, the choice of Contentstack came down to the dialogue with the sales rep.
Chose Contentstack
Before deciding on Contentstack, we researched some tools, we chose it because of the ease of creating and changing content, the API options for querying content, the ease of modeling new content APIs, high capacity of the CDN to deliver content, ease of integration with other …
dotCMS

No answer on this topic

Features
ContentstackdotCMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.4
Ratings
10% below category average
dotCMS
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.5
Ratings
4% below category average
dotCMS
-
Ratings
API8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.1
Ratings
4% above category average
dotCMS
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design6.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
6.4
Ratings
16% below category average
dotCMS
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentstackdotCMS
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentstackdotCMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentstackdotCMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The user interface is intuitive and cleanly designed.
  • The functionality is flexible which allows us to build our own application behind the CMS that meets business needs without being restricted by limitations in the CMS.
  • The service we get from our Account Manager and Technical contacts is excellent.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
  • In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
  • Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We are able to prepare for large campaigns within a few days which can bel rolled our within a few clicks. This was previously never possible before we moved to Contentstack.
  • We now have the tools and ability to architect in a way to take advantage of SEO and drive traffic. Our blog now serves more traffic that the rest of our website. This SEO effort wasn't possible before Contentstack.
  • One of our KPI's for moving to headless was a faster website and we now deliver pages under our original target while serving more asset and content rich pages to visitors
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

dotCMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Custom WorkflowsScreenshot of HTML5 and CSS3 templating with full support for responsive design.Screenshot of Auto clustering servers allows customers to quickly scale environments.Screenshot of Mobile development framework with full support for responsive design.