Contentstack vs. Firefox Reality

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentstack
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.N/A
Firefox Reality
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Firefox Reality is a solution designed to help users browse in virtual or mixed reality, with solutions for Viveport, Oculus, Pico, or Hololens. It is an open source solution. It is presented as a browser to bring add-on support to the immersive web. The user can download extensions that help take control of the VR browsing experience, such as uBlock, Dark Reader, and Privacy Badger. The browser can also do the work of remembering and entering passwords and other frequent form text with our…N/A
Pricing
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.7
11 Ratings
4% below category average
Firefox Reality
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.711 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.1
10 Ratings
5% above category average
Firefox Reality
-
Ratings
API8.29 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.2
12 Ratings
8% above category average
Firefox Reality
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section7.812 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates7.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design6.79 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow7.710 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
6.6
12 Ratings
11% below category average
Firefox Reality
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy7.510 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management6.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions6.48 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management5.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Small Businesses
Divi
Divi
Score 9.9 out of 10
Autodesk 3ds Max
Autodesk 3ds Max
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Contentful
Contentful
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Contentful
Contentful
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(12 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentstackFirefox Reality
Likelihood to Recommend
Contentstack
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Read full review
Mozilla Foundation
Especially in the university context, Firefox Reality has a particularly high utility value as an open-source application. Wherever content is not only conveyed in 2D but also in 3D, Firefox Reality is a safe and powerful browser that can be used on all common VR glasses. The low administration effort and the clear interface provide both teachers and learners with great value.
Read full review
Pros
Contentstack
  • Enables us to build and architect content through the use of their easy to use software and user interface.
  • Customer service has been by far the most reliable and responsive in any vendor i've dealt with.
  • Listens to feedback and builds features and technical improvements that helps customers usability and experience.
Read full review
Mozilla Foundation
  • Switch between 2D and 3D content.
  • secure and fast browser for 3D content.
  • Private Modus.
  • Full screen and focus mode, cinema mode.
Read full review
Cons
Contentstack
  • In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
  • In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
  • Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
Read full review
Mozilla Foundation
  • Speech recognition for voice control.
  • Regular updates with new functions.
  • Immediate security updates when security vulnerabilities become known.
Read full review
Support Rating
Contentstack
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Read full review
Mozilla Foundation
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Contentstack
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Read full review
Mozilla Foundation
Firefox Reality is convincing precisely because of the open source code. This also opens up the possibility for students to independently comprehend all aspects of the program in the code and thus learn a mature approach to the technology. Comparable products cannot offer this added value, which is particularly important in a university context.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Contentstack
  • Saved significant amounts of money that would previously been spent on 3rd party agencies to build websites
  • Empowered Comms teams to create and edit the design and content of their own websites on demand rather than relying on the Dev team
  • Allowed the Development team to concentrate on building functionality rather than websites, so we can focus on improvement rather than BAU work.
Read full review
Mozilla Foundation
  • Students engagement with VR-Technology.
  • Low-threshold interaction with technology.
  • Independent testing of the application in teaching-learning contexts.
Read full review
ScreenShots